Email this article 
CULTURAL AND SEMIOTIC APPROACH TO POLITICAL NEWS NARRATIVE ANALYSIS
- Authors: Tameryan T.Y.1, Shaipova A.M.2
-
Affiliations:
- Khetagurov North Ossetian State University
- Moscow State Institute of International Relations at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
- Issue: No 11(892) (2024)
- Pages: 105-111
- Section: Linguistics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-2197/article/view/292017
- ID: 292017
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The study is aimed at the hermeneutic analysis of verbally and verbally-visually represented semiotic meanings in the Russian political narrative. The main tasks are to identify, decode and interpret cognitive models of polycode semiotic constructs in electronic media. A wide socio-political and cultural contexts are used, deciphering semiotic codes used in various channels of perception. Blends of metaphorical and metaphtonymic cognitive constructs are given based on the mortal, somatic-mythological, religious, instrumental and religious, retributive, vendetta and protectionist models.
About the authors
Tatiana Yulievna Tameryan
Khetagurov North Ossetian State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: tamertu@mail.ru
Doctor of Philology, Professor of Department of Foreign Languages for Non-linguistic Specialties, Khetagurov North Ossetian State University
Russian FederationAmina Musaevna Shaipova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Email: amina_shaipova@mail.ru
Lecture of the Department № 6 of English Moscow State University of International Relations
Russian FederationReferences
- Cosenza, G. (2020). What Can Semiotics Do for Political Communication? Comucazione Politica, 21(1), 99–114.
- Dijk van, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383.
- O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. In Dillard, J. P., Pifatu, M. (Eds.), The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice (pp. 329–344). London: Sage Publications.
- Guseinova, I. A., Gorozhanov, A. I. (2023а). Connotated image as a way of constructing informational opposition in the fictional and publicistic genre. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Humanit. soc. sci., 16(6), 911–920. (In Russ.)
- Guseynova, I. A., Gorozhanov, A. I. (2023б). Ideology as a Factor of Translation: Traditions in Innovation. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], 22(3), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu2.2023.3.6. (In Russ.)
- Mihkelsaar, J. (2018). Lotman’s semiotic theory of culture or Laclau’s political ontology? Semiotica, 224, 135–163.
- Selg, P. (2016). ‘The Fable of the Bs’: Between Substantialism and Deep Relational Thinking about Power. Journal of Political Power, 9(2), 183–205.
- Selg, P. (2018). Power and Relational Sociology. In Dépelteau, F. (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology (pp. 539–557). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Selg, Р., Ventsel, A. (2019). What is political semiotics and why does it matter? A reply to Janar Mihkelsaar. Semiotica, 231, 1–10. 10.1515/sem-2018-0097.
- Tameryan, T. Yu, Zheltukhina, M. R., Anikejeva, I. G., Arkhipenko, N. A, Soboleva, E. I., Skuybedina, O. N. (2020). Оn language explication of the conceptualized meanings in ethno-cultural and socio-politcal aspects, Opcion, 36(26), 456–475.
- Tameryan, T. Yu., Shaipova, A. M. (2022). Interprecedent Semiotic Space, or When the Cannons are Heard, the Muses aren’t Silent. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 4, 145–166. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
