CULTURAL AND SEMIOTIC APPROACH TO POLITICAL NEWS NARRATIVE ANALYSIS

Capa

Citar

Resumo

The study is aimed at the hermeneutic analysis of verbally and verbally-visually represented semiotic meanings in the Russian political narrative. The main tasks are to identify, decode and interpret cognitive models of polycode semiotic constructs in electronic media. A wide socio-political and cultural contexts are used, deciphering semiotic codes used in various channels of perception. Blends of metaphorical and metaphtonymic cognitive constructs are given based on the mortal, somatic-mythological, religious, instrumental and religious, retributive, vendetta and protectionist models.

Sobre autores

Tatiana Tameryan

Khetagurov North Ossetian State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: tamertu@mail.ru

Doctor of Philology, Professor of Department of Foreign Languages for Non-linguistic Specialties, Khetagurov North Ossetian State University

Rússia

Amina Shaipova

Moscow State Institute of International Relations at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia

Email: amina_shaipova@mail.ru

Lecture of the Department № 6 of English Moscow State University of International Relations

Rússia

Bibliografia

  1. Cosenza, G. (2020). What Can Semiotics Do for Political Communication? Comucazione Politica, 21(1), 99–114.
  2. Dijk van, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359–383.
  3. O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Guilt as a mechanism of persuasion. In Dillard, J. P., Pifatu, M. (Eds.), The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice (pp. 329–344). London: Sage Publications.
  4. Guseinova, I. A., Gorozhanov, A. I. (2023а). Connotated image as a way of constructing informational opposition in the fictional and publicistic genre. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Humanit. soc. sci., 16(6), 911–920. (In Russ.)
  5. Guseynova, I. A., Gorozhanov, A. I. (2023б). Ideology as a Factor of Translation: Traditions in Innovation. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie [Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics], 22(3), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.15688/ jvolsu2.2023.3.6. (In Russ.)
  6. Mihkelsaar, J. (2018). Lotman’s semiotic theory of culture or Laclau’s political ontology? Semiotica, 224, 135–163.
  7. Selg, P. (2016). ‘The Fable of the Bs’: Between Substantialism and Deep Relational Thinking about Power. Journal of Political Power, 9(2), 183–205.
  8. Selg, P. (2018). Power and Relational Sociology. In Dépelteau, F. (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology (pp. 539–557). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Selg, Р., Ventsel, A. (2019). What is political semiotics and why does it matter? A reply to Janar Mihkelsaar. Semiotica, 231, 1–10. 10.1515/sem-2018-0097.
  10. Tameryan, T. Yu, Zheltukhina, M. R., Anikejeva, I. G., Arkhipenko, N. A, Soboleva, E. I., Skuybedina, O. N. (2020). Оn language explication of the conceptualized meanings in ethno-cultural and socio-politcal aspects, Opcion, 36(26), 456–475.
  11. Tameryan, T. Yu., Shaipova, A. M. (2022). Interprecedent Semiotic Space, or When the Cannons are Heard, the Muses aren’t Silent. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 4, 145–166. (In Russ.)

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).