Digital literacy of teachers: diagnostic result

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The digitalization of the education system poses several issues for interaction between teachers and students: mastering modern digital tools and resources, the safety of working on the Internet, education and self-education using information technology. These issues are especially acute in the process of organizing the education of children of primary school age. There must be teachers next to schoolchildren who are ready to form the digital literacy of students and who are able to provide digital mentoring. The goal is to analyze the results of diagnostics of teachers on the level of digital literacy development, the model of digital mentoring they implement, and its impact on the process of developing digital literacy among primary school students. The study is conducted based on the data obtained during the approbation by teachers of schools in the Perm Territory of the results of previous applied research on the development of functional literacy of students in the framework of the implementation of educational programs “Digital Literacy of Primary School Students” (State task No. 07-00080-21-02 dated August 18th, 2021, registry entry number 730000Ф.99.1). The study used such methods as the method of continuous correspondence survey, the descriptive method, the extrapolation method, as well as analysis, synthesis and generalization of the obtained data. During the first part of the survey, it was revealed that all respondents have fragmented, unsystematic ideas about the digital literacy of younger students. They may sometimes use this occasional knowledge in their professional activities while experiencing an urgent need for motivational tools and avoiding responsibility for the use of digital tools in their activities. More than 70% of teachers choose the “learning together” mentoring model. The model is characterized by: teachers’ awareness of the high potential of digital technologies; occasional use of digital tools in practical activities; understanding of the importance of cooperation with colleagues while working with digital technologies. The research shows the direct relationship between the levels of digital literacy of a mentor and a student: the higher the level of digital competencies of a teacher, the higher the likelihood of early involvement of students in digital technologies. The stated hypothesis about the systemic knowledge of teachers involved in the project on digital literacy of primary school students, and their use of different models of digital mentoring in their work, was partially confirmed. The issues of systematic knowledge about digital resources and readiness to use digital tools in the educational process in primary school require further study.

About the authors

Liliya Viktorovna Volkova

Perm State Humanitarian-Pedagogical University

Email: volkova_lv@pspu.ru
ul. Sibirskaya, 24, Perm, Russian Federation, 614990

Yuliya Sergeyevna Volkova

Perm State National Research University

Email: yu.wlkw@gmail.com
ul.Bukireva, 15, Perm, Russian Federation, 614068

References

  1. Бернс Э., Сильвеннойнен Э., Копнов В. А., Щипанова Д. Е., Папич-Благоевич Н., Томашевич С. Развитие цифровых компетенций преподавателей профессионального образования и обучения в Сербии и России // Образование и наука. 2020. Вып. 22 (9). С. 174–203. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-9-174-203
  2. Чернышов С. А. Массовый переход школы на дистанционное обучение в оценках локального педагогического сообщества // Образование и наука. 2021. Вып. 23 (3). С. 131–155. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-3-131-155
  3. Смагулова Г. Ж., Саржанова Г. Б., Тлеужанова Г. К., Станчу Н. Развитие цифровых компетенций будущих учителей иностранного языка в области разработки мультимедийных учебных пособий // Образование и наука. 2021. Вып. 23 (6). С. 216–245. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-216-245
  4. Борисенко Н. А., Миронова К. В., Шишкова С. В., Граник Г. Г. Особенности цифрового чтения современных подростков: результаты теоретико-эмпирического исследования // Science for Education Today. 2020. № 5. С. 28–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2005.02
  5. Солдатова Г. В., Трифонова А. В. Поколение Z в формате многозадачности и вопросы адаптации к цифровой среде // Комплексные исследования человека: психология: материалы VII Сибирского психол. форума. Томск: Томский гос. ун-т, 2017. С. 208–211.
  6. Law D. D., Hales K., Busenbark D. Student Success: A Literature Review of Faculty to Student Mentoring // Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence. 2020. Vol. 4, Is. 1. doi: 10.15142/38x2-n847
  7. Crisp G., Baker V.L., Griffin K.A., Lunsford L.G., Pifer M.J. Mentoring Undergraduate Students // ASHE Higher Education Report: Special Issue. 2017. Vol. 43, Is. 1. P. 1–117. doi: 10.1002/aehe.20117
  8. Блинникова А. В., Большедворская М. В., Кузнецова М. В. Рекомендации по формированию профессиональных компетенций в системе подготовки бакалавров «Управление персоналом» посредством наставнической деятельности // Педагогический ИМИДЖ. 2018. Вып. 3 (40). С. 148–161. doi: 10.32343/2409-5052-2018-11-3-148-161
  9. Golden A. A., Bogan Y., Brown L., Onwukwe O., Stewart S. Faculty mentoring: Applying ecological theory to practice at historically Black colleges or universities // Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2017. Vol. 27, Is. 5. P. 487–497. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2017.1279097
  10. Livingstone N., Naismith N. Faculty and undergraduate student perceptions of an integrated mentoring approach // Active Learning in Higher Education. 2018. Vol. 19, Is. 1. P. 77–92. doi: 10.1177/1469787417723233
  11. McWilliams E. A. Wake Forest University: Building a Campus-Wide Mentoring Culture // Metropolitan Universities. 2017. Vol. 28, Is. 3. P. 67–79. doi: 10.18060/21449
  12. Cornelius V., Wood L., Lai J. Implementation and evaluation of a formal academic-peer-mentoring programme in higher education // Active Learning in Higher Education. 2016. Vol. 17, Is. 3. P. 193–205. doi: 10.1177/1469787416654796
  13. Mendez S. L., Martin Conley V., Keith R. S., Haynes C., Gerhardt R. Mentorship in the engineering professoriate: exploring the role of social cognitive career theory // International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education. 2017. Vol. 6, Is. 4. P. 302–316. doi: 10.1108/IJMCE-12-2016-0077
  14. Бороненко Т. А., Федотова В. С. Цифровое наставничество: готовы ли учителя участвовать в формировании цифровой грамотности школьников? // Ярославский пед. вестник. 2020. Вып. 4 (115). С. 33–44. doi: 10.20323/1813-145Х-2020-4-115-33-44
  15. Игнатьева Е. В., Базарнова Н. Д. Наставничество в современной школе: миф или реальность? // Вестник Мининского ун-та. 2018. Т. 6, вып. 2. С. 1. doi: 10.26795/2307-1281-2018-6-2-1
  16. Шилова О. Н., Ермолаева М. Г., Ахтиева Г. Р. Современное состояние и проблемы развития института наставничества молодых учителей // Человек и образование. 2018. Вып. 4 (57). С. 202–209.
  17. Волкова Л. В., Волкова Ю. С. Цифровая грамотность младших школьников: условия и механизмы формирования // Гуманитарные исследования. Педагогика и психология. 2022. Вып. 10. С. 23–34.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).