“Quarrel of Ancients and Moderns” in the Light of Philosophical Anthropology
- 作者: Bondarev А.P.1
-
隶属关系:
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- 期: 编号 11 (879) (2023)
- 页面: 130-136
- 栏目: Literary criticism
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-2197/article/view/328115
- ID: 328115
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
“The quarrel of ancients and moderns” which flared up at the turn of the 17th -18th centuries between the French “archaists and innovators”, is seen as a reaction of the intellectuals of the era of Louis XIV to their realization of the fact of the “foundless” of the man of the New Age. The search for ways to overcome “suspension” (Deleuze) divided the debaters into admirers of Antiquity and apologists for progress. The accumulation of pro et contra arguments spontaneously involved them in the ongoing discussion on the “problem of man” (Buber), which is the province of philosophical anthropology.
作者简介
Аlexandre Bondarev
Moscow State Linguistic University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: prosaika@yandex.ru
Doctor of Philology (Dr. habil.), Professor at the Department of Russian and Foreign Literature Faculty of Translation and Interpreting Moscow State Linguistic University
俄罗斯联邦参考
- Buber, M. (1999). Problema cheloveka / Dva obraza very = The problem of man / Two images of faith (pp. 202–300). Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)
- Paskal’, Blez (1974). Mysli = Thoughts / La Rochefoucauld: Maxims. Pascal: Thoughts. C. de La Bruyère: Characters (pp. 111–186). Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. (In Russ.)
- Fuko, M. (1994). Slova i veshchi/ Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk = Words and things. Archeology of the Humanities (pp. 28–407). St. Petersburg: A-cad. (In Russ.)
- Yung, K. G. (1995). Psikhologicheskiye tipy = Psychological types. (pp. 23– 660). St. Petersburg: Yuventa; ProgressUnivers. (In Russ.)
- Monten’, Mishel’. (1979). Opyty V trekh knigakh. Kniga tret’ya = Essays (book three, pp. 5–311, book two, pp. 293–698). In three books. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
- Perrault, Ch. (1697). Parallèles des anciens et modernes = Parallels of ancient and modern. T. 4. Paris. (In French)
- Vol’ter.(1974). Drevniye i novyye = Ancient and new / Aesthetics. Articles. Letters. Preface and discussion. (pp. 174–177) Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
- Bualo. (1985). Kriticheskiye razmyshleniya o nekotorykh yavleniyakh iz sochineniy ritora Longina = Critical reflections on some places from the writings of the rhetor Longinus / Quarrel of ancient and moderns. (pp.250–268). Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
- Gegel’, G. V. F. (2007). Lektsii po estetike = Lectures on aesthetics (vol. 2): in 2 vols. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)
- Fontenel’, B. (1985). Svobodnoye rassuzhdeniye o drevnikh i novykh = Free discussion about the ancient and new. Quarrel of ancient and moderns (pp. 250–264). Moscow: Iskusstvo. (In Russ.)
- Russo, Zh.-Zh. (1981). Emil’, ili O vospitanii = Emil, or About education. Pedagogicheskiye sochineniya (vol. 1, pp. 22–554): in 2 vols. Moscow: Pedagogika. (In Russ.)
- Shiller, F. (1935). Pis’ma ob esteticheskom vospitanii cheloveka = Letters on the aesthetic education of a person. Stat’i po estetike (pp. 200–293). Moscow–Leningrad: Academia. (In Russ.)
- Prust, M. (1999). Protiv Sent-Beva = Against Sainte-Bev (pp. 25–106): articles and essays. Moscow: CheRo. (In Russ.)
补充文件
