Email this article 
Pragmatic Potential of Intertextuality in French Internet Discourse
- Authors: Bykova O.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- Issue: No 3(897) (2025)
- Pages: 65-72
- Section: Linguistics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-2197/article/view/286482
- ID: 286482
Cite item
Abstract
The aim of the conducted research is to identify the pragmatic potential of implementing intertextual relationships in French-language internet discourse. The article analyzes the use of a fragment from a well-known French song in various contexts based on data from French-speaking social networks. The analysis is carried out within the framework of discursive and pragmatic approaches, utilizing contextual, statistical methods, and methods of analysis and synthesis. The article describes the pragmatic potential of the category of intertextuality in French-language internet discourse and identifies the main models of intertextual relationships. The results of the research contribute to the development of the study of intertextuality in new mediated forms of communication.
About the authors
Olga Alexeevna Bykova
Moscow State Linguistic University
Author for correspondence.
Email: bykoolya@yandex.ru
PhD (Philology), Acting Head of the Department of Lexicology and Stylistics, Faculty of the French Language
Russian FederationReferences
- Gignoux, A.-C. (2006). De l’intertextualité à la récriture. Cahiers de Narratologie, 13, 1–8.
- Litvinenko, T. E. (2008). Intertekst i ego lingvisticheskie osnovy (na materiale latinoamerikanskikh khudozhestvennykh tekstov) = Intertext and its linguistic and stylistic foundations (on the material of Latin American fictional texts): PhD in Philology. Yakutsk. (In Russ.)
- Akimova, T. P. et al. (2016). Intertekstual’nost’ i figury interteksta v diskursakh raznykh tipov = Intertextuality and intertext figures in different types of discourse. Moscow: Flinta : Nauka. (In Russ.)
- Kolokol’ceva, T. N. (2018). Dialog vs dialogichnost’ v internet-kommunikacii. Internet-kommunikaciya kak novaya rechevaya formaciya = Dialogue vs dialogicality in Internet communication. In Internet communication as a new speech formation (pp. 139–188). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
- Kanashina, S. V. (2019). Intertextuality as a text category in Internet meme. Ivzestia of the Volgograd State PedagogicalUniversity, 7(140), 133–138. (In Russ.)
- Kristeva, J. (1969). Sèméiotikè. Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Seuil.
- Gorshkova, N. E., Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2021). Visual intertextuality as a method for meaning generation. Communication Studies, 8(4), 689–700. (In Russ.)
- Kolokol’ceva, T. N. (2013). New era of intertextuality: globalization of intertext connections in the age of the Internet. Ivzestia of the Volgograd State PedagogicalUniversity, 6(81), 61–66.
- Moskvin, V. P. (2013). Intertextuality: category apparatus and typology. Ivzestia of the Volgograd State PedagogicalUniversity, 6(81), 54–61. (In Russ.)
- Chernyavskaya, V. E. (2009). Lingvistika teksta: polikodovost’, intertekstual’nost’, interdiskursivnost’ = Text Linguistics: its Polycode Charakter, intertextuality, interdicursiveness. Moscow: LIBROKOM. (In Russ.)
- P’ege-gro N. (2008). Vvedenie v teoriyu intertekstual’nosti = Introduction in the Intertextuality theory. Moscow: LKI. (In Russ.)
- Bykova, O. A. (2020). Intertextuality and Precedency as the Basis of Game in the Internet Discourse. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 10(839), 76–86. (In Russ.)
- Genette, G. (1982). Palimpsestes. Paris: Seuil.
Supplementary files
