“Composite formations” as a Stylistic Device (Based on the Material of D. I. Rubina’s Novel “Maniac Gurevich”)

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article is devoted to the analysis of “composite formations” in the text of D. I. Rubina’s novel “Maniac Gurevich”. “Composite formations” are units that are formally similar to compound names or compound words. However, their structure, semantics and functions are different. They cannot be considered compound words due to their difference from the latter in the internal form of the word, as well as a wide range of linguistic units that become components of such “composites”. In addition to nouns, their components can be adjectives, participles, verbs, adverbs, etc. “Composite formations” are characterized by multicomponence, this is characteristic of those units, the lexical and grammatical content of which are nouns and verbs.

The main function of such formations is a stylistic device. In the text of the novel, they help to create a non-linear narrative, to make it the very sequence of pictures from the life of the hero, which the author of the work considers to be the main feature of the composition of the novel. Such constructions are able to convey a situation or event through the prism of the hero’s perception of the actions of objects, their signs, all this merges into a synthesis of sensations and memories in the mind of the character and creates a special perceptual effect for the reader.

It is difficult to determine their linguistic status, when analyzing such formations. The problem arises whether the concept of a word is applicable to them, what are the semantic and grammatical characteristics of this linguistic unit.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Darya M. Dedkovskaya

Irkutsk National Research Technical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: darya_dedkovskay@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

References

  1. Avdevnina O. Yu. [The concept of the subject of perception in the anthropology of language and text] Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Filologiya. Zhurnalistika, 2011, no. 2, pp. 7–16. (In Russ.)
  2. Akhmanova O. S. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov. [Dictionary of linguistic Terms]. Moscow: URSS: Editorial URSS Publ., 2004. 571 p.
  3. Droga M. A. [Compound names of the Russian language]. Sovremennye problemy yazykoznaniya, literaturovedeniya, mezhkul’turnoi kommunikatsii i lingvodidaktiki: sb. nauch. st. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Modern problems of linguistics, literary studies, intercultural communication and linguodidactics: collection of scientific articles of the international scientific conference]. Belgorod, May 12–14, 2014. Moscow, 2014, pp. 159–164. (In Russ.)
  4. Kostromina M. V. Binominy v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Semantika. Grammatika. Orfografiya. Avtoreferat dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Binomials in modern Russian. Semantics. Grammar. Spelling: Cand. philol. sci. diss. abstr.]. Moscow, 1992. 23 p.
  5. Lavrova S. Yu. [The perceptual image as an Axiological sign of the artistic World (based on the material of K. D. Balmont's “Essays”)]. Solnechnaya pryazha, no. 2. Ivanovo, 2008, pp. 10–16. (In Russ.)
  6. Nikolina N. A. [The functioning of hyphenated complexes in modern speech]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2011, no. 6 (2), pp. 467–469. (In Russ.)
  7. Svetozarova N. D. [Syntagma]. Russkii yazyk: Ehntsiklopediya. Pod red. Yu. N. Karaulova. [Russian language: Encyclopedia. Ed. by Yu. N. Karaulov]. Moscow, Bol'shaya Rossiiskaya Ehntsiklopediya Publ., 2003, pp. 469–470. (In Russ.)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies