Sino-Russian cooperation in the context of Sino-US strategic rivalry

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

With the strategic rivalry between China and the United States becoming a hot issue in current international relations, a probe into the causes of such rivalry is of realistic importance. Different from views that regard the escalation of the rivalry as resulting from the structural differences between the Chinese and American economy, the author argues that it is the changes in American politics that have intensified the ideological rivalry of the United States against China. Under the impact of this strategic shift in American politics, particularly with the narrowing of gaps between the national strengths of China and the United States, the United States is changing its views of China, regarding the latter as its would-be enemy. The improper handling of social problems brought about by economic globalization has worsened the relationship between the American government and society, bringing in its wake waves of populism, whose particular concern with economic issues in turn makes the American government pay particular attention to economic issues in its China agenda. The polarized appeals of interests of American voters have accelerated the polarization of American politics, which further lifts up the intensity of the strategic rivalry of the United States against China, causing its China policy to waiver from time to time. This is the direct cause of the downturn of the Sino-US relationship. Facing the escalating strategic competition between China and the United States, the 20th National Congress of the CPC made it clear that with the world entering into a period of turbulence following the transference of power from the West to the East, it is important to strengthen international governance to keep peace and stability of the world. In this context, China needs to coordinate its diplomatic relations with major countries and neighboring countries and strive for the building of a human community with a shared future in order to cope with the escalating strategic rivalry from the United States. At the same time, China needs to strengthen its cooperation with Russia to alleviate the security pressure from the Sino- US strategic competition. China and Russia have extensive common ground in promoting the multi-polarization of the world and maintaining peace in Eurasia as well as in cooperation with new emerging economies. Both countries should shoulder their responsibilities as great powers for promoting world peace and development while safeguarding their own national security.

About the authors

Bo Xu

Jilin University

Email: bxu2@jlu.edu.cn
Changchun, People’s Republic of China

Huiwen Ding

Jilin University

Email: inghw21@mails.jlu.edu.cn
Changchun, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Сюй Б. 2022. Внешнеполитическая мысль Си Цзиньпина и китайско-российское сотрудничество. Международный дискуссионный клуб "Валдай". Available at: https://ru.valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/vneshnepoliticheskaya-mysl-si-tszinpinа
  2. He, K. 2017. Explaining United States-China relations: neoclassical realism and the nexus of threat-interest perceptions. The Pacific Review, No.2, p. 133-151, doi: 10.1080/09512748.2016.1201130
  3. Jervis, R. 2020. Liberalism, the Blob, and American Foreign Policy: Evidence and Methodology. Security Studies, No. 3, p. 434-456.
  4. Jie, D. 2016. Political Polarization in the United States and American Democracy. The Chinese Journal of American Studies, No. 2, p. 61-74; 6-7.
  5. Lin, H. 2017. The Polarization Trend of Contemporary Populism and Its Institutional Roots. The Journal of International Studies, No. 1, p. 36-51; 5-6.
  6. Lukyanov, F. 2016. Putin's Foreign Policy: The Quest to Restore Russia's Rightful Place. Foreign Affairs, No. 3, p. 30-37.
  7. Maher, R. 2018. Bipolarity and the Future of U.S.-China Relations. Political Science Quarterly, No.3, p. 497-525.
  8. Mearsheimer, J. 2014. "Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West's Fault". Foreign Affairs 93: 77-89.
  9. Mearsheimer, J. The Great Delusion, Connecticut: Yale University Press. 2018.
  10. Petri, P., Plummer, M. 2020. RCEP: A new trade agreement that will shape global economics and politics. Brookings Institution. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/11/16/rcep-a-new-trade-agreement-that-will-shape-global-economics-and-politics/.
  11. Ripsman, N., Taliaferro, J., Lobell, S. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Translated by Feng Liu, Chen Zhang. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2017.
  12. Ruan, Z. 2018. Building A Human Community with A Shared Future to Support China in the Period of Strategic Opportunity.International Studies, No.1, p. 13-26+139.
  13. Segal, S., Reynolds, M., Roberts, B. 2021. Degrees of Separation: A Targeted Approach to U.S.-China Decoupling-Interim Report. CSIS. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/degrees- separation-targeted-approach-us-china-decoupling-interim-report.
  14. Vuving, A. The Future of China's Rise: How China's Economic Growth Will Shift the Sino-U.S. Balance of Power, 2010-2040. Asian Politics & Policy, No. 2, p. 401-423.
  15. Wojczewski, T. 2020. Trump, Populism, and American Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, No. 3, p. 292-311.
  16. Wright, T. 2020. The Folly of Retrenchment: Why America Can't Withdraw from the World. Foreign Affairs, No. 2, p. 10-18.
  17. Xu, B., Zhong, R. 2022. An Analysis of Russia's Pragmatic Climate Policy. Northeast Asia Forum, No. 1, p. 36- 48; 127. doi: 10.13654/j.cnki.naf.2022.01.003

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies