Enviar artigo por via de e-mail 
Tense-Aspect-Taxis Complex as a Means of Forming a Drama Dialogue (a case-study of B. Shaw’s “Pygmalion”)
- Autores: Sorokina T.S.1, Erokhina O.V.1
-
Afiliações:
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- Edição: Nº 4(872) (2023)
- Páginas: 104-112
- Seção: Linguistics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-2197/article/view/351967
- ID: 351967
Citar
Texto integral
Resumo
The article is a case-study of B. Shaw's “Pygmalion” to illustrate segmentation of dialogue and analyse the realization of Tense-Aspect-Taxis complex as means of forming a drama dialogue. The resulting evidence is that the playwright's choice of TAT-complex in his dramatic method of discussion is indirectly reflected in the language worldview of the time, affected by the respective literary movement.
Sobre autores
Tatiana Sorokina
Moscow State Linguistic University
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: sotan1462116@gmail.com
Doctor of Philology (Dr. habil.), Professor, Professor at the Department of Grammar and History of English, Faculty of the English Language
RússiaOlga Erokhina
Moscow State Linguistic University
Email: olgaverokhina@gmail.com
Postgraduate Student, Department of Grammar and History of English, Faculty of the English Language
RússiaBibliografia
- Fillmore, Ch. (1989). Grammatical Construction Theory and the Familiar Dichotomies. Language Processing in Social Context (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Bondarko, A. V. (2002). Teoriya znacheniya v sisteme funkcional‘noj grammatiki: Na materiale russkogo yazyka. = The theory of meaning in the system of functional grammar (founded on the materials of the Russian language). Institute of Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures. (In Russ.)
- Teplickaya, N. I. (1974). Nekotorye problemy dialogicheskogo teksta = Some aspects of dialogical text: PhD in Philology. Moscow.
- Baranov, A. N., Krejdlin, G. E. (1992). Struktura dialogicheskogo teksta: leksicheskie pokazateli minimal’nyh dialogov = The structure of the dialogical text: lexical indicators of minimal dialogues. Voprosy yazykoznanija, 3, 84–93. (In Russ.)
- Krejdlin, G. E. (2006). Means of interaction between verbal and nonverbal sign units in a dialogue. Part I: batons. Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies (pp. 290–296): international conference “Dialogue 2006” proceedings. Russian State University for the Humanities. (In Russ.)
- Sokolova, V. L. (2008). Kommunikativnaya struktura angloyazychnogo hudozhestvennogo dialoga = Communicative structure of English literary dialogue: PhD in Philology. Moscow.
- Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Zhurcheva, O. V. (2001). Forms of expression of the author’s consciousness in New Drama at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries. Vestnik of Samara State University. Literature Studies, 1, 1–11. (In Russ.)
- Trutneva, A. N. (2015). P’esa-diskussiya v dramaturgii B. Show konca XIX nachala XX veka (problema zhanra) = A play discussion in the dramaturgy of B. Shaw of the late 19th and early 20th centuries (the problem of the genre): abstract of PhD in Philology. Nizhnij Novgorod.
Arquivos suplementares
