Email this article 
Mythologemes of Myth and Typologemes of History
- Authors: Bondarev А.P.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow State Linguistic University
- Issue: No 13(881) (2023)
- Pages: 114-122
- Section: Literary criticism
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-2197/article/view/322563
- ID: 322563
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The purpose of the proposed article is to substantiate the hypothesis that both mythologeme and typologeme are equally historical categories forming a correlative pair - the unity of analogy and opposition. They are brought together by the archiseme common to the timeless mythologeme and the situational typologeme; they are opposed by the great historical time, localizing the mythologeme in the absolute past, and the typologeme in the relative present, the typified characters and circumstances of which grow to archetypal over time.
About the authors
Аlexandre Petrovich Bondarev
Moscow State Linguistic University
Author for correspondence.
Email: literatura_mglu@mail.ru
Doctor of Philology (Dr. habil.), Professor, Professor at the Department of Russian and Foreign Literature Faculty of Translation and Interpreting Moscow State Linguistic University
Russian FederationReferences
- Eliade, M. (1987). Kosmos i istoriya. Izbrannye raboty = Cosmos and history. Selected works. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)
- Jung, K. G. (1996). Dusha i mif: shest’ arhetipov = Soul and myth: six archetypes. Kiev. (In Russ.)
- Schelling, F. V. (1966). Filosofiya iskusstva = Philosophy of Art. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russ.)
- Bondarev, A. P. (2018). Orest i Edip – dva polyusa evropejskoj kul’tury = Orestes and Oedipus – two poles of European culture. In Epistemologiya literaturovedeniya = Epistemology of Literary studies (pр. 129–140). Moscow: Moscow State Linguistic University. (In Russ.)
- Benichou, P. (1967). Morales du grand siècle. Paris: Gallimard.
Supplementary files
