Event Frame as Cognitive Schema of Metaphorisation (English resultative and non-resultative constructions)

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

The article seeks to present a variety of event frame build around the concept “state” as a cognitive schema of metaphorisation. The metaphoric schema is presumably a cross-domain mapping where relations between the source domain and the target domain are treated as specific event metaphors which inherit main features of abstract metaphors. Data of concept-based source domain are given as realized in resultative and non-resultative grammatical constructions.

Авторлар туралы

Tatiana Sorokina

Moscow State Linguistic University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: sotan1462116@gmail.com

Doctor of Philology (Dr. habil.), Professor, Professor at the Department of Grammar and History of English, Faculty of the English Language

Ресей

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Sorokina, T. S. (2018). Concept “State” as Gestalt and a Cognitive Schema of Linguistic Interpretation. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 10(803), 161–174. (In Russ.)
  2. Minsky, M. (1979). A framework for representing knowledge, transl. by O. N. Grinbaum, ed. by F. M. Kulakov. Moscow: Energiya. (In Russ.)
  3. Fillmore, Ch. (1977). Case for case reopened. Syntax and semantics 8: Grammatical relations. New York: Academic Press.
  4. Fauconnier, G., Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.
  5. Boldyrev, N. N. (2007). Knowledge representation in the system of language. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 17–27. (In Russ.)
  6. Sullivan, K. (2007). Grammar in Metaphor: A Construction Grammar Account of Metaphoric Language: PhD Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
  7. Dejk, T. A. van. (1989). Jazyk. Poznanie. Kommunikacija: collection of works by T. A. van Dejk ; compiled by V. V. Petrov, transl. from English and ed. by V. I. Gerasimov, foreword by Ju. N. Karaulov, V. V. Petrov. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)
  8. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  9. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003. Updated edition.
  10. Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L. (2009). On figuration in grammar. In Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 1–45). Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  11. Fillmore, Ch. (1989). Grammatical Construction Theory and the Familiar Dichotomies. Language Processing in Social Context (pp. 17–38). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  12. Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  13. Boas, H. (2003) A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stratford: CSLT Publications.
  14. Israel, M. (1996). The Way Constructions Grow. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 217–230). Stanford, CA: CLSI.
  15. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge University Press.
  16. Roush, D. (2016). The Expression of the Location Event-Structure Metaphor in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 16(3), 389–432.
  17. Taverniers, M. (2002). Metaphor. In: Verschueren, J., Östman, J.-O., Blommaert, J., Bulcaen, Ch. (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 1–40). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  18. Boldyrev, N. N. (2016). Kognitivnye shemy jazykovoj interpretacii = Cognitive Schemas of Linguistic Interpretation. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 10–20. (In Russ.)

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу


Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).