Content analysis as a method of information war research (based on the representation of the Sino-American trade war in the media discourse of the PRC and the USA)

Capa
  • Autores: Kalinin O.I.1, Prikhodko M.V.2
  • Afiliações:
    1. Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation,Moscow State Linguistic University
    2. Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
  • Edição: Nº 12(880) (2023)
  • Páginas: 39-47
  • Seção: Linguistics
  • URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-2197/article/view/323791
  • ID: 323791

Citar

Resumo

The article studies the problem if content analysis is applicable to research information warfare, considered at several levels of information impact. The instrumental level is actualized at the lexical level and can be studied through critical discourse analysis based on quantitative and qualitative content analysis. The results confirm the applicability of the described approach and demonstrate the features of the “US-China trade war” discourse.

Sobre autores

Oleg Kalinin

Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation,Moscow State Linguistic University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: okalinin.lingua@gmail.com

Doctor of Philology (Dr. habil.), Associate Professor at the 36th Department Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor at the Chinese Language Department Faculty of Translation and Interpreting Moscow State Linguistic University

Rússia

Mark Prikhodko

Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Email: marko007@mail.ru

Adjunct at Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

Rússia

Bibliografia

  1. Kalinin, O. I., Knyazeva, E. G. (2023). Cognitivediscursive approach to information war. Cognitive Studies of Language, 3(54), 441–446. (In Russ.)
  2. Kalinin, O. I. (2018). Osnovy` lingvopragmaticheskogo issledovaniya politicheskogo imidzha = Fundamentals of linguopragmatic study of language. Moscow: KnoRus. (In Russ.)
  3. Byodeker, H. E. (Ed.) (2010). Istoriya ponyatij, istoriya diskursa, istoriya mentaliteta = History of terms, history of discourse, history of mentality. Digest of articles, transl. from German. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (In Russ.)
  4. Prikhodko, M. V. (2023). Linguistic model of information war: structural elements and impact levels. Vestnik of Moscow Region State University. Series: Linguistics, 3, 57–71. (In Russ.)
  5. Sidorova, N. A., Muravlyova, V. R. (2021). Kommunikativnaya situaciya “informacionnaya vojna”: pragmatika i lingvistika = Communicative situation “information war”: pragmatics and linguistics. Moscow: IE Kolmogorov Igor` Aleksandrovich. (In Russ.)
  6. Simpson, P., Mayr A., Statham, S. (2018). Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. In Language and Power (pp. 58–65). Second edition. New York: Routledge.
  7. Wodak, R. (2011). Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. In Discursive Pragmatics (pp. 50–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamines Publishing Company.
  8. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Analysis of Language. Abingdon: Routledge.
  9. Anthony, L. (2013). A critical look at software tools in corpus linguistics. Linguistic Research, 30(2), 141–161.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).