Relevance of Linguistic Theory of Translation and Translation Practice

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

The article reviews the main accomplishments of the linguistic theory of translation and argues in favour of its relevance to present-day translation science, which is confirmed by translation practice. The author of the article analyses criticism against the linguistic theory of translation from the proponents of the interpretive theory of D. Seleskovitch and M. Lederer, and comments on its credibility.

Sobre autores

Igor Matyushin

Moscow State Linguistic University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: igor.matyushin@gmail.com

PhD (Philology), Associate Professor at the Department of Russian-French Translation, Faculty of Translation and Interpreting

Rússia

Bibliografia

  1. Reformatskii, A. A. (1952). Lingvisticheskie voprosy perevoda = Linguistic issues of translation. Inostrannye yazyki v shkole, 6, 12–22. (In Russ.)
  2. Raková, Z. Les théories de la traduction. 1. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2014.
  3. Prunč, E. (2015). Puti razvitiya zapadnogo perevodovedeniya. Ot yazykovoi asimmetrii k politicheskoi = The ways of development of Western translation studies. From language asymmetry to political one. Moscow: R.Valent. (In Russ.)
  4. Komissarov, V. N. (2000). Sovremennoe perevodovedenie = Modern Translatology. Course of Lectures. Moscow: ETS. (In Russ.)
  5. Vinay, J.-P., Darbelnet, J. (1972). Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Méthode de traduction. Nouvelle édition revue et corrigée. Paris : Didier.
  6. Fedorov, A. V. (2090). Osnovy obshchei teorii perevoda (lingvisticheskie problemy) = Foundation of General Theory of Translation (Linguistic Problems). Saint Petersburg: Philological Faculty of SPbSU, Moscow: Philology Tri. (In Russ.)
  7. Mounin, G. (1963). Les problèmes théoriques de la traduction. Paris : Gallimard.
  8. Catford, J. (1978) Lingvisticheskaya teoria perevoda. = Linguistic Theory of Translation. Voprosy teorii perevoda v zarubejnoi lingvistike (pp. 91–114). Moscow: Mejdunarodnie otnoshenia. (In Russ.)
  9. Khukhuni, G. Т., Valuytseva, I. I. (2023). History of translatology: Scientific subject. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2(870), 35–41. http://www.vestnik-mslu.ru/Vest/2_870_H.pdf (In Russ).
  10. Delisle, J. (1984). L’analyse du discours comme méthode de traduction. Théorie et pratique. Ottawa : Presses Universitaires.
  11. Bodrova (Gojenmos), T. I. (2021). Rossiiskoye perevodovedenie v svete interpretativnoi teorii perevoda (Teoria, praktika i metodika prepodavania) = La Traductologie russe (Théorie, pratique, enseignement : ses apports et ses limites). Voronej: Nauka-Unipress. (In Russ.)
  12. Seleskovitch, D., Lederer, M. (1993). Interpréter pour traduire. 3ème édition, revue et corrigée. Paris : Didier Érudition. Latyshev, L. К. (2005). Technologia perevoda = Translation technology. Moscow: Academia. (In Russ.)
  13. Barkhudarov, L. S. (1975). Yazik i perevod (Voprosy obshei i chastnoi teorii perevoda) = Language and Translation (Issues of General and Private Theory of Translation). Moscow: Mejdunarodnie otnoshenia. (In Russ.)
  14. Shveitser, A. D. (1988). Teoria perevoda: Status, problemy, aspekty = Theory of Translation: Status, Problems, Aspects. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar


Creative Commons License
Este artigo é disponível sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).