Email this article 
Military and Political Discourse as a Linguocultural Complex Phenomenon
- Authors: Tenitilov P.S.1, Mazura L.K.1
-
Affiliations:
- Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
- Issue: No 5(899) (2025)
- Pages: 91-97
- Section: Linguistics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-2197/article/view/297129
- ID: 297129
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to explore the phenomenon of military and political discourse as a multi-level communicative practice integrating elements of political rhetoric and military terminology. The author focuses on the institutional nature of the discourse, its sociocultural characteristics, and methods of legitimizing the use of force in international relations. Key features of military-political discourse are identified: the polarization of “us” and “them” images, dramatization of threats, emphasis on historical continuity, and the use of emotional and symbolic arguments. The analysis of translation challenges reveals difficulties in interpreting terms and metaphors due to cultural and linguistic differences.
About the authors
Pavel Sergeevich Tenitilov
Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: paulinhotradutor@mail.ru
PhD in Pedagogy, Deputy Head of the Chair for Romance Languages
Russian FederationLidia Konstantinovna Mazura
Prince Alexander Nevsky Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Email: lidkasuper2013@yandex.ru
PhD Student
Russian FederationReferences
- Karasik, V. I. (2000). Common problems of studying discourse. In Linguistic personality: institutional and personal discourse (pp. 5–20). Volgograd: Peremena. (In Russ.)
- Homutova, T. N. (2017). Military-political discourse as a special type of discourse. Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics, 14(3), 49–53. (In Russ.)
- Naumova, K. A. (2019). Content analysis of military-political and military-journalistic discourse formats in a comparative aspect. Politicheskaja lingvistika, 3(75), 96–105. (In Russ.)
- Mishkurov, E. N. (2020). Modern military-political discourse: Nomination, functions, language deviation, translation. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 22: Theory of Translation, 2, 88–105. (In Russ.)
- Van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Communicating Ideologies. Ed. by M. Ptz, Jo Anne Neff van Aertselaer. Frankfurt: Lang.
- Shvejcer, A. D. (1994). Translation and cultural tradition. Perevod i lingvistika teksta (pp. 64–75): The digest of articles. Moscow: Vserossijskij centr perevodov. (In Russ.)
- Hajrullin, V. I. (1995). Linguistic, cultural and cognitive aspects of translation: Senior doctoral thesis in Philology. Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)
- Driga, M. V. (2022). Constitutive features of military-political discourse. Bulletin of the Russian New University. Series: Human in the Modern World, 1, 41–49. (In Russ.)
- Shashok, L. A. (2019). Structural features of military discourse: Rationale for the necessity of research. Actual issues of philological sciences (pp. 9–13): Materials of the VI International Scientific Conference (Krasnodar, January 2019). Krasnodar: Novatsiya. (In Russ.)
- Dem’jankov, V. Z. (2002). Political discourse as a subject of political science philology. Politicheskaja nauka, 3, 31–44. (In Russ.)
- Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (2004). Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem = Metaphors We Live by. Editorial URSS. (In Russ.)
- Mavleev, R. R. (2019). Military-political discourse: Socio-communicative, linguistic-cognitive, and translation aspects: Based on Chinese and Russian languages: PhD thesis in Philology. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
