Email this article 
Representation of the Linguistic argumentative type “Namby-pamby” (based on A. P. Chekhov’s short story “Namby-pamby”)
- Authors: Fanyan N.Y.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kuban State University
- Issue: No 4(898) (2025)
- Pages: 107-112
- Section: Linguistics
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2542-2197/article/view/292042
- ID: 292042
Cite item
Abstract
In the article, the author continues the discussion of the linguistic argumentative type (LAT). The aim of the research is to describe the type (character) of “namby-pamby” based on the material of the short story by A. P. Chekhov. During the research interpretive, linguistic-argumentative, semantic-stylistic methods of analysis were used. The scientific novelty of the research is revealed in the linguistic argumentative approach, which provides the tools for analysis of the taxonomy of linguistic argumentative types, according to the type of linguistic and cultural types. The author comes to the conclusion that both verbal and non-verbal means of expression, including kinetic, somatic reactions, states of the analyzed type (character), are of great importance in the formation of LAT. The dialogue between the proponent and the opponent acts as a form of actualization of LAT.
About the authors
Nelly Yurievna Fanyan
Kuban State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: nellyfanian@mail.ru
Doctor of Philology, Professor, Professor of the Department of French Philology
Russian FederationReferences
- Fanyan, N. Yu. (2023). Representation of the linguistic argumentative type “household sophist” (based on A.P. Chekhov’s short story “A Dear Dog”). Humanitarian Researches, 3(87), 102–107. (In Russ.)
- Karasik, V. I. (Ed.). (2005). Aksiologicheskaya lingvistika: lingvokul`turny`e tipazhi = Axiological linguistics: linguistic and cultural types. Volgograd: Peremena. (In Russ.)
- Fanyan, N. Yu. (2000). Argumentaciya kak lingvopragmaticheskaya struktura = Argumentation as a linguopragmatic structure: Senior Doctoral thesis in Philology. Krasnodar (In Russ.)
- Stepanov, Yu. S. (1998). Yazyk i metod. K sovremennoj filosofii yazyka = Language and method. Towards the modern Philosophy of Language. Moscow: Yazyki russkoj kul’tury. (In Russ.)
- Uspenskij, B. A. (2012). Ego Loquens: Yazyk i kommunikacionnoe prostranstvo = Language and communication space. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities. (In Russ.)
- Karaulov, Yu. N. (1987). Russkij yazy`k i yazy`kovaya lichnost` = Russian language and linguistic personality. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
- Bogin, G. I. (2009). Urovnevoe razvitie yazykovoj lichnosti = The level development of a linguistic personality. Volume 1. Tver: Tver State University (In Russ.)
- Petrov, V. V. (1986). Yazyk i logicheskaya teoriya = Language and logical theory. New in foreign linguistics. Logical analysis of Natural language, 18, 5–23. (In Russ.)
- Ivin, A. A. (2009). Sovremennaya logika = Modern logic. Fryazino: Vek-2. (In Russ.)
- Eemeren van, Frans H., Grootendorst, R. (2021). Sistematicheskaya teoriya argumentacii. Pragma-dialekticheskij podkhod = A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Moscow: Kanon+. (In Russ.)
- Barebina, N. S. (2012). Argumentativnyj dialog v aspekte teorii konceptual’noj integracii = Argumentative dialogue in the aspect of the theory of conceptual integration. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 1(030), 5–12. (In Russ.)
- Tamrazova, I. G. (2016). Kognitivnoe prostranstvo ehristiki = The cognitive space of eristics. Cognitive studies of language, 26, 85–87. (In Russ.)
- Abul’hanova-Slavskaya, K. A. (1986). Lichnostnye tipy myshleniya = Personal types of thinking. Cognitivnaja psychologija (pp. 154–172). Issues of the Finnish-Soviet symposium. (In Russ.)
- Kalashnikova, S. V. (2007). Lingvisticheskie aspekty stilej myshleniya v argumentativnom diskurse = Linguistic aspects of thinking styles in argumentative discourse: abstract of PhD thesis in Philology. Tver State University. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
