Historical metamorphosis of the ideological framework of "threat" and "resource" in the coverage of immigration by Chinese media (19th–21st centuries)
- Authors: ZHAO Q.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 12 (2025)
- Pages: 16-27
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0749/article/view/372105
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2025.12.77192
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NWRSSI
- ID: 372105
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article presents a systematic historical-discursive analysis of the evolution of the ideological frames of "threat" and "resource" in the discourse of Chinese state media on immigration throughout four key historical periods (19th-21st centuries). The subject of the study is the evolution of ideological frames in the discourse of Chinese state media (press) on immigration over four historical periods: the late imperial era (Qing dynasty), republican period (Republic of China, 1912–1949), early socialist period (PRC from 1949–1980), and the modern era of reform and globalization (late 20th – early 21st centuries). The analysis examines not only explicit narratives but also deep linguistic structures, rhetorical strategies, and contextual conditions that shape the image of the immigrant and the migration process. A historical-discursive analysis of the dynamics of two fundamental and often contrasting frames used by Chinese media in covering immigration: the "threat" frame (emphasizing risks to security, cultural homogeneity, and social stability) and the "resource" frame (highlighting economic, demographic, or innovative benefits). The scientific novelty of the study lies in the following. First, for the first time within a single study, a systematic comparison of media discourse on immigration is conducted over such a prolonged historical period (19th-21st centuries), allowing for the identification of not only breaks but also continuities in ideological patterns. Second, the work contributes to frame theory by applying it to the long-term ideological process in a non-Western media context, demonstrating how frames adapt to changes in political regimes. Third, the novelty lies not in simply stating the replacement of one frame with another, but in revealing their complex coexistence, mutual supplementation, and contextual switching depending on the target audience and current state priorities. Thus, the article offers a comprehensive model for analyzing how, through the lens of media discourse, the image of the "other" immigrant was constructed and transformed in Chinese public consciousness, reflecting the deep logic of the relationships between the state, the nation, and the global world at different stages of Chinese history.
References
Fillmore Ch. Scenes-and-Frames Semantics // Current issues in linguistic theory. Bloomington / London: Indiana University Press, 1977. Pp. 76-138. Чилингарян К.П., Сорокина Л.С. В поисках оптимального метода анализа глубинных структур: фреймовая семантика и классификация аргументных структур // Филология: научные исследования. 2024. № 3. С. 137-154. doi: 10.7256/2454-0749.2024.3.70155 EDN: KESMHO URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=70155 Чилингарян К.П., Сорокина Л.С. В поисках оптимального метода анализа глубинных структур: фреймовая семантика и классификация аргументных структур // Филология: научные исследования. 2024. № 3. С. 137-154. doi: 10.7256/2454-0749.2024.3.70155 EDN: KESMHO URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=70155 Токарева С. Б. Конструирование образа России в публичном и общественно-политическом дискурсе: от семантического описания к метафорическому фреймингу событий // Logos et Praxis. 2021. Т. 20, № 1. С. 36-48. doi: 10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2021.1.5 EDN: OLXUGN. Сергеев Г. И. От дибао до "Жэньминь жибао". Путь в 1200 лет (История средств массовых коммуникаций Китая). М.: Изд-во Ун-та дружбы народов, 1989. 167 с. King G., Pan J., Roberts M. E. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression // American Political Science Review. 2013. Vol. 107, no. 2. P. 326-343. doi: 10.1017/S0003055413000014 EDN: RIZFNL. 戈公振 (Гэ Гунчжэнь). 《中国报学史》 (История китайской журналистики). 上海 (Шанхай): 商务印书馆 (Коммерческое издательство), 1927. Huters T. Bringing the World Home: Appropriating the West in Late Qing and Early Republican China. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2005. 370 p. Шаронова В. Г. История русской эмиграции в Китае // Русское зарубежье. 2014. № 3. С. 217-231. Kranzler D. Japanese, Nazis and Jews: The Jewish Refugee Community of Shanghai, 1938–1945. Brooklyn: Yeshiva University Press, 1976. 620 p. Zhang Jing. Foreign experts in the People's Republic of China: an historical review from the perspectives of modernization and globalization (1949–1966) // Modern Chinese History. 2022. Vol. 15, no. 2. P. 195-213. Lovell J. The Uses of Foreigners in Mao-Era China: 'Techniques of Hospitality' and International Image-Building in the People's Republic, 1949–1976 // Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 2015. Sixth Series, Vol. 25. P. 135-158. Speelman T. Establishing the National Immigration Administration: Change and Continuity in China's Immigration Reforms // China Perspectives. 2020. № 4. P. 7-16. doi: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.11103 EDN: VFXLDC.
Supplementary files

