Deepfake as one of the main information threats of the 21st century

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a tool that can provide a multitude of opportunities for those who can use it effectively. However, as always with global changes in society, there is a downside—the technology is learned not only for good but also for implementing personal plans and ideas that can cause serious harm to both individuals and society as a whole. Deepfake, as a product created by AI, is currently one of the most serious information threats, as it can deceive not only an inexperienced user but also a professional in the IT field. Every day, the media landscape sees more and more high-profile examples of deepfakes that are impossible to distinguish from real audio or video recordings. The aim of this article is to present the characteristic features of deepfake as a digital product, to provide a typology of such publications based on their creation methods and objectives, as well as to describe possible markers for recognizing fakes in the online environment. The research methodology is based on a systematic-structural analysis of the media space, allowing for the typologization of deepfakes, as well as on content analysis, which made it possible to identify the goals and characteristic features of various deepfakes. The study also applies descriptive and generalization methods. The empirical basis consisted of generated content in photo, audio, and video formats that caused a public resonance and were publicly debunked either by the creators themselves, by media outlets, or by vigilant users. The chronological scope of the research is 2020–2025. A total of 69 deepfakes were analyzed. The material was collected through a comprehensive sampling method and included publications mentioned in the media (on TV channels such as “Channel One,” NTV, and “Russia 1,” the platform “Smotrim,” online publications such as “Lenta.ru” and “Gazeta.ru,” and websites of news agencies “RIA Novosti” and TASS). This approach allowed for the formation of an understanding of the themes, goals, and methods of reproducing deepfakes, as well as for identifying the most effective ways to recognize them. These markers are relevant and effective at the current stage, as they allow for the most prompt and effective distinction of generation, which is especially important in the context of the constant improvement of neural network functioning mechanisms.

References

  1. Батоев В. Б., Пучнин А. В. Использование технологии deepfake в преступной деятельности: проблемы противодействия и пути их решения // Вестник ВИ МВД России. 2023. № 1. С. 165-169. EDN: MIUJNO.
  2. Галяшина Е. И. и др. Фейковизация как средство информационной войны в интернет-медиа: научно-практическое пособие. М.: Блок-Принт, 2023. EDN: NTUNGW.
  3. Добробаба М. Б. Дипфейки как угроза правам человека // Lex Russica. 2022. № 11 (192). С. 112-119. doi: 10.17803/1729-5920.2022.192.11.112-119. EDN: XMHEAJ.
  4. Ильченко С. Н. Фейк-контроль, или Новости, которым не надо верить: как нас дурачат СМИ. Ростов н/Д: Феникс, 2021.
  5. Колесникова Е. В. Технология deepfake в журналистике // Мир современных медиа: новые возможности и перспективы: сб. научных трудов / под общ. ред. Д. В. Неренц. М.: Знание-М, 2022. С. 74-77. EDN: CCYEHV.
  6. Лукина Ю. В. Использование дипфейков в общественно-политической жизни // Русская политология. 2023. № 2 (27). С. 41-48. EDN: CEXDQA.
  7. Манвелов Н. В. Понятие "фейк" в медиакоммуникациях – история и современные подходы к проблеме // Коммуникация – дискурс – дискурсивные практики: Сборник научных трудов. М.: РАНХиГС, 2023. С. 148-159.
  8. Маркеры фейка в медиатекстах: учебно-методическое пособие / И. А. Стернин, А. М. Шестерина, К. И. Грибанова [и др.]. Воронеж: РИТМ, 2020.
  9. Неренц Д. В. Специфика применения искусственного интеллекта в современном медиапространстве // Litera. 2024. № 8. С. 186-198.
  10. Савушкина М. А. Дипфейк как цифровое оружие гибридной войны // Вестник ОмГУ. 2024. № 4. С. 45-54.
  11. Фалалеев М. А., Ситдикова Н. А., Нечай Е. Е. Дипфейк как феномен политической коммуникации // Вестник ЗабГУ. 2021. № 6. С. 101-106. doi: 10.21209/2227-9245-2021-27-6-101-106. EDN: ZBZRKO.
  12. Фейки: коммуникация, смыслы, ответственность. Коллективная монография / С. Т. Золян, Н. А. Пробст, Ж. Р. Сладкевич, Г. Л. Тульчинский; под ред. Г. Л. Тульчинского. СПб.: Алетейя, 2021.
  13. Kalyan A.K.R. A review on Ethical and Legal Challenges of Deepfake Technology // International Journal Of Scientific Research In Engineering And Management. 2025. No 09 (04). Pр. 1-9.
  14. Marconi F. Newsmakers: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Journalism. NY: Columbia University Press, 2020.
  15. Stray J. Making Artificial Intelligence Work for Investigative Journalism // Digital Journalism. 2019. No 7 (8). Pр. 1076-1097.
  16. Tandoc Jr. E., Thomas R., Bishop L. What Is (Fake) News? Analyzing News Values (and More) in Fake Stories // Media and Communication. 2021. Vol. 9. No 1. Pр. 112-123.
  17. Waldrop M. News Feature: The genuine problem of fake news // PNAS. 2017. No 114 (48). Рр. 12631-12634.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).