The Stylistic Expression of Irony in Galen’s Polemics
- Authors: Prolygina I.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 193-205
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0749/article/view/371963
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2025.5.74384
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LWWBWU
- ID: 371963
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article presents an analysis of excerpts from Galen’s works in which he ridicules and defames his opponents using various types of irony and a wide range of stylistic devices for its expression. Public medical disputes were part of the "agonistic" culture of the Second Sophistic, and thus were conducted using rhetorical tools characteristic of judicial oratory, where victory depended not only on logical arguments but also on the oratorical skill of mocking and discrediting opponents. Thanks to the classical Greek education he received in his youth, Galen was well-versed in ancient rhetorical theories and confidently applied them in practice to engage in polemics with his opponents. The author examines different types of irony, such as wit, mockery, derision, and sarcasm. Depending on the context, Galen employs varying degrees of irony – from false self-deprecation to personal insults against his opponents – resorting to different stylistic devices such as hyperbole, paradox, antithesis, and rhetorical questions. The frequent use of superlative adjectives, derogatory comparisons, and lexical fields related to stupidity, empty talk, ignorance, madness, and shamelessness is noted, along with proverbs well known to the audience. Irony often carries a philosophical subtext, extending beyond medical disputes and touching on ethical issues. Thus, it serves not merely as a stylistic embellishment but constitutes an essential part of Galen’s polemical strategy aimed at asserting his own authority. It reflects his views on science, philosophy, and a society where intellectual debates required not only knowledge of the subject but also wit and, at times, ruthless criticism. The novelty of the study lies in expanding scholarly understanding of the role of medical debates during the Second Sophistic era and filling gaps in the study of rhetorical techniques in the language of medicine.
About the authors
Irina Viktorovna Prolygina
Email: prolygina99@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7492-9750
References
Petit C. Galien et le “discours de la méthode”: rhétorique(s) médicale(s) à l'époque romaine / J. Coste, D. Jacquart, J. Pigeaud (eds.). La rhétorique médicale à travers les siècles: actes du colloque international de Paris, 9 et 10 octobre 2008. Genève: Droz, 2012. P. 49-75. Nutton V. Galen's rhetoric of certainty / J. Coste, D. Jacquart, J. Pigeaud (eds.). La rhétorique médicale à travers les siècles: actes du colloque international de Paris, 9 et 10 octobre 2008. Genève: Droz, 2012. P. 39-49. Nutton V. Galeni De praecognitione. Galen. On Prognosis. CMG V 8, 1. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1979. Mattern S. Galen and the Rhetoric of Healing. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2008. Hankinson R. J. Galen's Anatomy of the Soul // Phronesis. 1991. Vol. 36, no. 3. P. 197-233. von Staden H. Galen and the "Second Sophistic" // R. Sorabji (ed.). Aristotle and After. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement LXVIII. London, 1997. P. 33-54. Пролыгина И.В. Гален как представитель греческой paideia эпохи Второй софистики // Hypothekai. Журнал по истории античной педагогической культуры. 2024. № 8. С. 55-73. doi: 10.32880/2587-7127-2024-8-8-55-73 EDN: QSILSU. Аристотель и античная литература / Отв. ред. М. Л. Гаспаров. М.: Наука, 1978. Античные риторики / Под ред. А. А. Тахо-Годи. М.: Издательство Московского университета, 1978. Лосев А.Ф. История античной эстетики. Итоги тысячелетнего развития. Кн. 2. М.: Фолио, 2000. С. 569-586. Пролыгина И.В. Гален. Увещание к занятию медициной. Вступ. статья, пер. с древнегреческого и примечания И.В. Пролыгиной // Вестник древней истории. 2013. № 3 (286). С. 283-299. EDN: RJYHLR. Rambourg C. Aristote et le dénigrement. Analyse des rapports entre la théorie rhétorique et la diabolè / L. Albert, L. Nicolas (eds.). Polémique et rhétorique de l'antiquité à nos jours. Bruxelles, 2010. P. 65-77. Piazza F. Διαβολή: the personal attack in Greek rhetoric / L. Calboli Montefusco, M. S. Celentano (eds.). Papers on Rhetoric XII. Perugia, 2014. P. 193-207. Petit C. Galien de Pergame ou la rhétorique de la Providence. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2018. Пролыгина И.В. Гален. О собственных книгах. // Schole. Философское антиковедение и классическая традиция. 2017. Т. 11, № 2. С. 636-677. doi: 10.21267/AQUILO.2017.11.6485 EDN: ZDOHBT. Roselli A. Ἐκ βιβλίου κυβερνήτης: I limiti dell'apprendimento dai libri nella formazione technica e filosofica (Galeno, Polibio, Filodemo) // Vichiana. 2002. 4a Serie, anno IV, 1. P. 35-50. Singer P.N., Rosen R.M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Galen. Oxford, 2024.
Supplementary files

