Conceptual Foundations of Digital Newsdiscourseology as a Fundamental Subdiscipline of Newslinguistics: Overcoming Outdated Scientific-Theoretical Models
- Authors: Ahmadova U.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 105-113
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0749/article/view/371858
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2025.1.73029
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BKBNHD
- ID: 371858
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The study primarily focuses on identifying the limitations and inadequacies of media linguistics and internet linguistics, which can no longer comprehensively address the specifics of the modern informational landscape due to outdated scientific and theoretical frameworks. There arises a need for clear delineation of the conceptual boundaries of the aforementioned disciplines to prevent methodological ambivalence. Additionally, in response to these challenges, the development of a distinct discipline – newslinguistics, exclusively dedicated to the study of the news landscape – is proposed. Within this framework, its specialised subdiscipline, newsdiscourseology, is introduced to encompass the exploration of all aspects of digital news discourse. A central construct of this subdiscipline is the concept of the hypernews – a type of inclusive text characteristic exclusively of next-generation news platforms. Consequently, the establishment of newsdiscourseology is regarded as a critical response to the demands of the contemporary informational paradigm, characterised by hypertextual, interactive, polycoded, and multimodal structures. Further investigation of this issue entails the creation of a new scientific and practical foundation, including the identification and structured representation of implicit linguistic patterns embedded within contemporary digital news platforms. Assigning these patterns explicitness and specificity will contribute to enhancing users’ cultural and intellectual levels, fostering their critical thinking, and advancing related scientific practices. These developments will also enable the creation of sophisticated software utilities, integrated into browser-based linguistic applications and automated analytical-statistical linguistic databases. These innovations will furnish the foundation for the synchronous and automated analysis of hypernews, the formulation of strategies for optimising news content consumption, and ensure accessibility for a broad spectrum of users, ranging from system administrators to the general public. Pursuant to the proposed paradigm shift, continued exploration within the domain of digital informational communications offers significant transformative potential for addressing the complex challenges of the information age.
About the authors
Ulkar Mazahir gizi Ahmadova
Email: ulya.gemini777@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-6153-5635
References
Corner J. Media Studies and the 'knowledge problem' // "em"Screen."/em" Vol. 36. Iss. 2. 1995. Pp. 147-155. Добросклонская Т.Г. Медиалингвистика: теория, методы, направления. [б. м.] : [б. и.]. 2020. 180 с. Halliday M.A.K. Language as Social Semiotic: The social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold. 1978. 256 p. Оглезнев В.В. Дж.Л.Остин и Г.Л.А.Харт о совершении действий при помощи сло // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. № 2(18). 2012. С. 147-153. Morris C.W. Foundations of the Theory of Signs / In Otto Neurath et al. (eds.). International encyclopedia of unified science. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press. Vol. I. No. 2. 1938. Pp. 1-59. Моррис Ч.У. Основания теории знаков // Семиотика, под ред. Ю. С. Степанова. М.: Радуга. 1983. С. 37-89. Бородовская А.Ю. Когнитивный подход к дизайну мультимедийных электронных образовательных ресурсов (теоретический аспект) // Мир науки, культуры, образования. № 6 (55). 2015. С. 10-12. Halliday M.A.K. Learning How to Mean: Explorations in the Development of Language. London: Edward Arnold. 1975. 164 p. Kress G. Multimodality: A Social Approach to contemporary Communication. London: Routledge. 2010. 212 p. Jewitt C., Kress G. (Eds.) Multimodal Literacy. Bern: Peter Lang. 2003. 196 p. Сорокина Ю.В. Понятие мультимодальности и вопросы анализа мультимодального лекционного дискурса // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. № 10 (76), Часть I, 2017. С. 168-170. Кибрик А.А. Мультимодальная лингвистика // Когнитивные исследования: сборник научных трудов. М.: Институт психологии РАН. Выпуск № 4. 2010. С. 134-152. Perspectives de l'OCDE sur les compétences 2023: Les compétences au service d’une transition écologique et numérique résiliente, Éditions OCDE, Paris: OCDE. 300 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/fe76e556-fr OECD. OECD Skills Outlook. OECD Publishing. Paris, 2024. Retrieved from: OECD Skills Outlook. Pp. 271-301. Гатов В. Будущее журналистики // Как новые медиа изменили журналистику. 2012–2016. Екатеринбург: Гуманитарный университет. 2016. С. 206-268. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd Edition. New York: The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc. 1983. 453 p. Дружинин А.М., Иноземцева Е.В., Гуров Ф.Н. Преодоление "информационного пузыря": постановка задачи, методология, аналитическое чтение // Ценности и смыслы. № 3(79). 2022. С. 96-110.
Supplementary files

