Functional and semantic peculurities of personal euphemisms of the Uzbek language through the prism of Russian and English cultures
- Authors: Alimov T.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 11 (2024)
- Pages: 23-39
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0749/article/view/371822
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2024.11.72019
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PAGFTY
- ID: 371822
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The subject of the study is the euphemistic codes of modern Russian, Uzbek and English languages, selected by continuous sampling from a variety of sources, including modern explanatory, specialized and linguistic dictionaries, as well as authentic texts of fiction and journalism. The total number of examples amounted to more than 1,234 units, of which 399 relate to Russian, 435 to Uzbek and 400 to English, which provided an opportunity to conduct a detailed analysis and formulate reliable conclusions. The purpose of the study is to identify and analyze the functional and semantic characteristics of personal euphemistic codes of the Uzbek language through the prism of comparison with Russian and English cultures. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that for the first time a comparative study is conducted focusing on the functional and semantic aspects of euphemistic units in the context of the linguistic and cultural paradigm. The main attention is paid to the analysis of ways to replace negative connotations associated with personal peculurities (age, death, and the nominative field "fat"), and to identify cultural factors influencing the formation and use of euphemistic units of the Uzbek language against the background of Russian and English cultures. For the first time, a quantitative analysis of functional and semantic groups of personal euphemisms is carried out in a comparative aspect, on the basis of which it is concluded that the national and cultural characteristics of the life of native speakers of Russian, English and Uzbek languages and the peculiarities of their mentality underlie the euphemistic nomination of a personal topic. The results of the research revealed unique cultural features in the formation and use of euphemistic units. Quantitative analysis has shown that in the Uzbek language the largest percentage of euphemistic codes refers to the sphere of death, which is significantly higher than in Russian and English. The euphemistic units associated with old age also differ: the Uzbek language shows a higher rate compared to Russian and English. On the contrary, euphemistic expressions regarding the negative connotation of "fat" are more common in English and Russian, compared to Uzbek.
References
Ахманова О. С. Словарь лингвистических термино. М.: УРСС: Едиториал УРСС, 2021. Аширбаева Д. Корейс ва ўзбек дискурсида мурожаатлар. Тошкент: Donishmand ziyosi, 2024. 144 б. Бегматов Э. Ўзбек исмлари изоҳи. Тошкент: Ўзбекистон миллий энциклопедияси, 2016. 608 б. Зиннятуллина Г.Ф. Культура повседневности: основные ценности мусульман // Вестник Московского государственного гуманитарного университета им. М.А. Шолохова. Серия «История и политология». 2015. № 2. С. 74-79. Зверева М. И. Эвфемизмы в современной публицистике как индикаторы состояния языковой среды: диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата филологических наук: дис. … канд. филол. наук. Cпб., 2023. 164 с. Ирисханова О. К. Игры фокуса в языке. Семантика, синтаксис и прагматика дефокусирования. М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2014. Мўминов С.М. Ўзбек мулоқот хулқининг ижтимоий-лисоний хусусиятлари. Фарғона: Classic, 2021. 224 б. Порохницкая Л. В. Концептуальные основания эвфемии в языке (на материале английского, немецкого, французского, испанского и итальянского языков): автореф. дис. … д-ра филол. наук. М., 2014. Телия В.Н. Вторичная номинация и ее виды // Языковая номинация. Виды наименований. М., 1977. С. 129-222. Туракулова Д. Б., М. Х. Мамадаминов. Межнациональное согласие и веротерпимость – высшие ценности узбекского народа // Scientific progress. 2022. Т. 3, № 5. С. 198-203. Gladkova A.N. and Larina T.V. Anna Wierzbicka, language, culture and communication. // Russian Journal of Linguistics. 2018. Vol. 22, № 4. Pp. 717-748. Goddard C. and Wierzbicka A. Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages, and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014a. 560 p. Logvina S. A. Essence and properties of euphemism from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. // Ученые записки Крымского федерального университета имени В.И. Вернадского. Филологические науки. 2021. Vol. 7, № 4. Pp. 125-144. Puhl R. M. What words should we use to talk about weight? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies examining preferences for weight‐related terminology // Obesity reviews. 2020. Vol. 21. № 6. Рр. 1-28. Westbury S., Oyebode O., Van Rens T., Barber T. M. Obesity stigma: causes, consequences, and potential solutions // Current Obesity Reports. 2023. Vol. 12, № 1. Pp. 10-23. Wierzbicka А. English: Meaning and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. 304 p. Wierzbicka А. New perspectives on kinship: Overcoming the Eurocentrism and scientism of kinship studies through lexical universals // In Nancy Bonvillain (ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic anthropology. New York: Routledge, 2015. Pp. 62-79.
Supplementary files

