Revisiting the Cultural and Linguistic Causality of Technogenic Stereotypes

Abstract

The object of the study is fragments of lay discourse about artificial intelligence and new technologies that express antipathy. The subject of the study is evaluative and emotional judgments about technologies and forms of their linguistic objectification, rooted in the discourse as a product of linguaculture. The authors consider the issue of pessimistic perception of technological progress in Western society. A productive way to study this issue is the stereotype as a cognitive-linguistic phenomenon. It was accepted that stereotypes play a special role in representing general features of national, social and other human character traits. The authors conclude that one of the main functions of the stereotype is its orienting function, which has influence on the components of the human being’s personality. The authors used such scientific methods as: introspection, comparison, analysis of dictionary definitions, descriptive-interpretative method, interpretation of discourse. This methods, in combination with text markup techniques, made it possible to identify fragments of discourse that were significant for analysis. The research was based on the English language texts from The Guardian and The New York Times news aggregators, on materials from MIT Technology Review and Neuroscience News magazines. The authors conclude that technogenic stereotypes in English discourse have a mythological basis in the form of religious motives and specific linguacultural images. This contrasts with the rational-critical view of information technology innovation. Intermediate findings include the conclusion about the role of media, social networks, which are the key actor of the discourse of hype about technological expansion. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that a new area of public discussion has been allocated, which is considered in the light of data on the orienting function of the stereotype, which requires academic reflection by specialists from different fields.

References

  1. Айлетт Р., Шарки Н., Варгас П. Жизнь с роботами. Что нужно знать каждому беспокоящемуся человеку; пер. И. Д. Голыбина. М.: АСТ. 2022. 288с.
  2. Гумбольдт В. Избранные труды по языкознанию. М. : Прогресс, 2000. 400 с.
  3. Дзялошинский И. М. Когнитивные процессы человека и искусственный интеллект в контексте цифровой цивилизации. М. : Ай Пи Ар Медиа, 2022. 538 с.
  4. Косяков В. А., Николаева Н. Н., Шастина И. А. Ориентирующая функция языка. Иркутск : Изд-во БГУЭП, 2011. 317 с.
  5. Лисецкий М.Л., Сопина А.Л. Персонификация роботов в публицистическом дискурсе: friend or foe // Актуальные проблемы языкознания. 2019. Т. 1. С. 29–34.
  6. Матурана У. Р, Варела Ф. Х. Древо познания. М. : Прогресс-Традиция, 2001. 223 c.
  7. Моторина И.Е., Акимова И.А., Кондаурова К.И., Малолетнева И.В. Технофобия как реальность современного мира // МНИЖ. 2021. № 4–3 (106). С. 159–164.
  8. Тер-Минасова С. Г. Язык и межкультурная коммуникация. М. : Слово, 2000. 624 с.
  9. Bell G. No More SMS from Jesus: Ubicomp, Religion and Techno-spiritual Practices // UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing. UbiComp 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer; P. Dourish, A. Friday (eds). Vol 4206. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2006. Pp 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853565_9
  10. Ito J. Why Westerners Fear Robots and the Japanese Do Not // Wired. July, 2018. URL: https://www.wired.com/story/ideas-joi-ito-robot-overlords/?mbid=social_twitter_onsiteshare
  11. Knight H. How Humans Respond to Robots: Building Public Policy through Good Design // The project of Civilian Robotics. Brookings. 2014. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/humanrobot-partnershipsr2.pdf
  12. Mims C. Why Japanese Love Robots (And Americans Fear Them) // MIT Technology Review. October 12, 2010. URL: https://www.technologyreview.com/2010/10/12/120635/why-japanese-love-robots-and-americans-fear-them/
  13. Mori М. The Uncanny Valley: The Original Essay // Robotics & Automation magazine. 2017. URL: https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~drkelly/MoriTheUncannyValley1970.pdf .
  14. Neuroscience News Communications. Artificial Intelligence, and Our Fears: A Journey of Understanding and Acceptance Featured // Neuroscience. June 23, 2023. URL: https://neurosciencenews.com/artificial-intelligence-fear-neuroscience-23519/
  15. Nyholm S. A new control problem? Humanoid robots, artificial intelligence, and the value of control // AI and Ethics. 2022. 3(4):1-11. Pp. 1229–1239. doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00231
  16. Robot jokes. URL: https://scoutlife.org/about-scouts/merit-badge-resources/robotics/19223/robot-jokes/
  17. Schodt F. L. Inside the Robot Kingdom: Japan, Mechatronics and the Coming Robotopia. Tokio, New York: Kodansha International Inc. 1990. 256 p.
  18. Wilson M. AI Is Inventing Language Humans Can’t Understand. Should We Stop It? // Fast Company. 30 Sept.2017. URL: https://www.fastcompany.com/90132632/ai-is-inventing-its-own-perfect-languages-should-we-let-it
  19. Wording Robotics: Discourses and Representations on Robotics; J.-P. Laumond, E. Danblon, C. Pieters (eds.). Springer, 2019. 168 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).