Editorial Policies

Aims and Scope

The important results of fundamental and applied researches of the Russian and foreign leading scientists are published in the journal. At the same time the Editorials welcome unfledged researchers. 

The concept of the journal «Crede Experto»: transport, society, education, language is defined by the modern tendecies of the scientific search, namely a polydisciplinary character of scientific knowledge, innovative research approaches and practical significance of scientific works. The journal covers the topical issues of the modern humanitarian, natural and technical sciences.

 
 

Peer Review Process

  1. All articles submitted to the Editorial Board of the international information and analytical journal «Crede Experto» run the reviewing procedure.
  2. The order of the reviewing procedure is following: the reviewer is chosen by the responsible secretary of the journal among the members of the Advisory board (in agreement with the Chief Editor) or some of the leading specialists working in the given science field. The specialist working in the same department where the publication is done may not review an article.
  3. The editorial board of the Journal sends the manuscripts for peer review to a recognized expert in the field (a Doctor of Sciences or a Candidate of Sciences) who has published some papers on the same topics as the article under review in the last three years.
  4. Reviewers are informed that submitted articles are the author’s ownership and are confidential. Reviewers are forbidden to copy submitted articles for their own personal use.
  5. The reviewing period is fixed in agreement with a reviewer, but mustn’t exceed three weeks.
  6. The review must contain the relevance and novelty of the submitted material, fix the correspondence of the article to the edition profile and determine quality characteristics of the article (style of writing, competence, language culture etc.)
  7. The reviewing is confidential (a blind peer review). The author of the article is given a copy of the review. The review proofs are sent directly to the author via e-mail, fax or regular mail.
  8. The reviewer decides about the possibility of publishing the article: «publish, no significant alterations», «publish, but make changes to the article» or «reject, no right for a rewrite». In case of the manuscript is rejected, the Editorial board sends to the author a motivated refusal letter that is certified by the Chief Editor.
  9. If the author doesn’t agree the reviewer’s opinion, the author of the article may give a motivated letter in the Editorial Board. The article can be sent either for the secondary reviewing or agreement in the Editorial Board.
  10. If the review includes any recommendations on correction of the article, the responsible manager sends to the author the review letter to accept the sent recommendations while preparing a new manuscript (partly or fully) or reasonably refute arguments. A corrected article is sent for the reviewing procedure for the second time and discussed in general order. In this case the date of the article submitting is the same as the date of its return.
  11. The presence of positive review letter is not a sufficient reason for publishing the article. The final decision on including the publication in the issue is taken by the Advisory Board of the journal. Afterwards the responsible secretary tells the author about the decision and the date of publication.
  12. The content of each issue is approved at the meeting of the Advisory Board, which members take a decision on including publications in the issue in co-operation with reviewers.
  13. The original reviews are kept in the Editorial Board of the journal «Crede Experto» for 5 years.
  14. The editorial board of the Journal sends the copies of reviews to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation after receiving a corresponding request.

 

Publication Frequency

Выход 4 раза в год

Номер журналаСроки выхода журнала

1

март

2

июнь

3

сентябрь

4

декабрь

 

Open Access Policy

Статьи этого журнала доступны всем желающим с момента публикации, что обеспечивает свободный открытый доступ к результатам исследований и способствует прогрессу науки.

 

Publication ethics for the «Crede Experto» participants

The Editor in Chief, Advisory Board and Editorials of the international information and analytic journal «Crede Experto» accept the norms fixed by the Code of Publication Ethics and control their keeping by all the participants of a publishing process.

The Editor in Chief, Advisory Board and Editorials are guided, in particular, by the principles devised by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) as well as the experience of leading international journals and publishers. The actual content of the Code of Publication Ethics is available on the official website www.publicet.org/code.

All the participants of the publishing process «Crede Experto» including reviewers and authors should be tolerant to each other. Therefore, Editorials of the journal «Crede Experto» follow the following ethical principles:

Ethical principles of the Editor in Chief, Advisory Board and Editorials

The Editor in Chief, Advisory Board and Editorials of the journal «Crede Experto» are responsible to decide if articles are submitted for reviewing. Editorials should assess the content of the articles regardless of the nationality, race, religious or political beliefs of the author. They are forbidden to disclose any information about submitted articles to anyone except the author. The Editor in Chief, reviewers, Advisory Board and Editorials ensure maximum clearness of the publishing process, inform authors about a process of preparing their manuscripts for publishing; regulate the editorial conflicts of interests and guarantee absolute information confidentiality. Unpublished materials are forbidden for personal use of the reviewer and can not be given to anybody without an author’s written permission.

Ethical principles of reviewers

The review is a document on the basis of which the Editorial Board takes a decision on the acceptance or rejection of the article. Reviewers must strictly keep the rules of the journal publishing policy; be objective in evaluating the quality of the article (urgency, novelty, originality, information accuracy etx.), control the citation correctness, keep the reviewing terms of the articles and maintain information privacy. If the reviewer has any significant remarks on the article, he should immediately put them in a form of comments and, in agreement with the Editorial Board, send back to the author for rewriting. The criticism of the author is not allowed.

Ethical principles of authors

Articles applied for publication in the journal «Crede Experto» should be done in a full compliance with the editorial requirements. Articles are accepted for publication only if they haven’t been previously published or are not scheduled for publication in other scientific editions. If the were published previously, the Editorial Board has the right to deny the author to the further cooperation. Plagiarism (wilful authorship appropriation) and incorrect rehashing are not allowed. They can be an argument for a manuscript rejection. To avoid plagiarism the author should be accurate in making citations and bibliographic references. Self-plagiarism is another example of the publication ethics breach. Any kind of replication of the article or its parts is not permitted. The article should include only original scientific data. If the author finds out any mismatches in his manuscript, he should immediately inform the Editorial Board.

According to the editorial policy of the journal «Crede Experto» plagiarism, incorrect rehashing, using of other person work elements as well as self-plagiarism aren’t allowed.

 

Using of artificial intelligence in publications

Dear authors and researchers!

Due to the emergence and active implementation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in research activities, we recommend that authors of scientific articles using ChatGPT, Copilot and other AI programs follow these recommendations and submit a disclaimer:

  1. Authors should adhere to GOST R 71657-2024 ‘Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education. Functional subsystem of scientific publications creation. General Provisions’ https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data/836/83601.pdf; GOST R 70949-2023. Artificial intelligence technologies in education. Application of artificial intelligence in research activities. Usage options https://meganorm.ru/Data/814/81496.pdf
  1. Authors are required to indicate if generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot and others have been used in the process of creating the article. This should be done in the Materials and methods section.
  1. The text of article should contain the explanation of the purpose for which the AI has been used, point out the prompt-command question the author has used and then any part of the relevant text, that has been produced by the AI in response.
  1. For the generative AI tool used, you should indicate its name and a reference to it in the information and telecommunication network ‘Internet’. Since the References should include only scientific sources, the generative AI can be referred to directly in the text of the article, in the footnotes, for example: ‘text, text, text… ‘*

_________________________________________

* Perplexity (2024). ChatGPT-4 (desktop version) [Voice & Language”]. https://www.perplexity.ai/

Or

*Prompt ‘Text, Text, Text.’ ChatGPT-4, Android Version 2024, Perplexity, https://www.perplexity.ai/

  1. All AI-generated answers must undergo rigorous human review and editing. Authors must ensure that the information provided by the AI is accurate, relevant and true, and responses scientific standards.
  1. Generative AI cannot be listed as the author of the article. The people who have written the article are responsible for the copyright and its content. When AI tools are mentioned in articles, they may be cited as assistive technologies, but not as the as authors.
  2. Authors must observe with ethical standards and requirements for text originality. It is important to avoid cases of plagiarism, and all parts of the article created with the help of AI should be adapted and revised by the author so that they reflect his/her own style and thinking activities.
  1. When using AI to search for information or generate content, it is important to correctly cite primary sources and point to scholarly works referenced by the AI, if possible.
  1. If there are signs of using AI and in the absence of a disclaimer, the possibility of publishing an article by this author on this topic is excluded.
  2. We recommend that authors be as transparent as possible about their use of AI in the writing process. This will not only improve the quality of the paper, but also increase the credibility of the research results in the scientific community.

By following these guidelines, you will be able to ensure not only the high quality of your work, but also compliance with modern requirements of scientific publication. Thank you for your attention and we continue to work on improving science together!

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».