LINGUISTIC AND SEMANTIC MARKERS OF DESTRUCTIVE COMMUNICATIVE BEHAVIOR OF ADOLESCENTS IN SOCIAL NETWORKS
- Authors: Nikishina V.B1, Vishnevskaya A.A1, Gorbacheva A.S1, Petrash E.A1, Karpenko A.S1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Head of the Department of General and Social Psychology MGIMO Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Issue: Vol 46, No 6 (2025)
- Pages: 46-56
- Section: Psychology and the internet
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0205-9592/article/view/361736
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034577X25060056
- ID: 361736
Cite item
Abstract
About the authors
V. B Nikishina
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: vbnikishina@mail.ru
Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Psychology at the Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work Moscow, Russian Federation
A. A Vishnevskaya
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: rewvish@yandex.ru
Master’s degree student in the field of 37.04.01 “Psychology” Moscow, Russian Federation
A. S Gorbacheva
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: gorbacheva_as@rsmu.ru
Director of the Centre for Educational Programms Implementation of the Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work Moscow, Russian Federation
E. A Petrash
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: petrash@mail.ru
Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Clinical Psychology at the Institute of Clinical Psychology and Social Work Moscow, Russian Federation
A. S Karpenko
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Head of the Department of General and Social Psychology MGIMO Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Email: a.karpenko@odin.mgimo.ru
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation Moscow, Russian Federation
References
- Бикен Н.С. Типы коммуникативного поведения российских интернет-пользователей // Фундаментальные и прикладные исследования в современном мире. 2014. Т. 3. № 8. С. 72–75.
- Булаев Д.Ю. Психологические особенности коммуникации и агрессивного поведения подростков в онлайн-пространстве // Изв. Волгогр. гос. пед. ун-та. 2024. № 1(184). С. 85–91.
- Зимняя И.А. Лингвопсихология речевой деятельности. М.: Моск. психол.-соц. ин-т; Воронеж: МОДЭК, 2001. 432 с. (Серия “Психологи Отечества”)
- Козырева М.М. Обсценная лексика в речи образованных носителей английского и русского языков: функционально-прагматический аспект: дис. … канд. филол. наук. Москва, 2013.
- Леньков С.Л. Специфика деструктивной киберагрессии в образовательной среде // Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2020. № 4(115). С. 107–117.
- Никишина В.Б., Петраш Е.А., Моргун А.Н., Запесоцкая И.В. Трансформация параметров сообщений молодежи в социальных сетях // Психологический журнал. 2020. Т. 41. № 4. С. 78–91.
- Никишина В.Б., Петраш Е.А., Запесоцкая И.В. Лингвосемантические характеристики коммуникативного поведения молодежи в социальных сетях // Психологический журнал. 2017. Т. 38. № 5.
- Прохоров Ю.Е., Стернин И.А. Русские: коммуникативное поведение. М.: Флинта, 2006. 238 с.
- Солдатова Г.У., Рассказова Е.И., Чигарькова С.В. Виды киберагрессии: опыт подростков и молодежи // Национальный психологический журн. 2020. № 2(38).
- Юдеева Т.В. Мотивация деструктивного коммуникативного поведения подростков в социальных сетях // МНИЖ. 2022. № 2–2(116).
- de Lenne O., Eggermont S., Vandenbosch L. Researching the Malleability Narrative on Professional Ideals: The Role of Internal Attribution in the Relations Between Media and Adolescents’ Well-Being // Communication Studies. 2022. V. 73. № 5–6. P. 527–543.
- Fichman P., Rathi M. The impact of culture on online toxic disinhibition: Trolling in India and the USA // Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2022. P. 2890–2897.
- Kircaburun K., Alhabash S., Tosuntaş Ş.B. et al. Uses and Gratifications of Problematic Social Media Use Among University Students: A Simultaneous Examination of the Big Five of Personality Traits, Social Media Platforms, and Social Media Use Motives // Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2020. V. 18. P. 525–547.
- Lapidot-Lefler N., Barak A. Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition // Computers in Human Behavior. 2012. V. 28. № 2. P. 434–443.
- Melina A. Throwala, Mark D. Griffiths, Mike Rennoldson, Daria J. Kuss. Motivational processes and dysfunctional mechanisms of social media use among adolescents: A qualitative focus group study // Computers in Human Behavior. 2018.
- Nassen L., Karsay K., Vandenbosch L., Schreurs L. Exploring Adolescents’ Social Media Connection and Disconnection: A Latent Class Approach // Media and Communication. 2024. V. 12.
- Nitschinsk L., Tobin S.J., Vanman E.J. The Disinhibiting Effects of Anonymity Increase Online Trolling // Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022. V. 25. № 6. P. 377–383.
- Rousseau A., Frison E., Eggermont S. The reciprocal relations between facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and adolescents’ closeness to friends // J Adolesc. 2019. V. 76. P. 173–184.
- Suler J. The online disinhibition effect // Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004. V. 7. № 3. P. 321–326.
- Vranken I., Devos S., Vandenbosch L. Counter-Stereotypical Career-Related Media Content and Adolescents’ Professional Sexism: A Longitudinal Study of Woman Boss Television Series and Social Media Posts // Sex Roles. 2023. V. 89. P. 288–310.
Supplementary files

