The Precedent Phenomenon v derevnyu, k tetke, v glush’, v Saratov as a Linguoculturally Significant Reference to the Province

Capa

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The paper discusses the functional and semantic features of the precedent phenomenon v derevnyu, k tetke, v glush’, v Saratov in the Russian language culture when referring to the province. The pragmatics of the phenomenon is related to its component structure reduction. Two and three-component transforms prevail over the initial four-component collocation. The changes in the precedent phenomenon structure may be accompanied by the compositional switch, and changes in their grammar features. Under any transformation, the semantic centre glush’ stays the same. This is due to the zone of the Golden Ratio, which falls on the third component of the initial collocation. The precedent phenomenon and its transforms actively function in the strong textual positions of the title, the first and the last sentence of the text or the paragraph. In such a case, the three-component transforms undergo modal transforms within the framework of the variable interpretation of reality. Two-component transforms serve as a basis for a problem segmentation, which enables the problem to be defined and the situation to be described. The semantic features of the precedent pheno­menon are represented by the range of the contextually relevant meanings as well as by the inclusion in the opposition “capital — province”. The precedent phenomenon v derevnyu, k tetke, v glush’, v Saratov is used for different language games, such as analytical formations and contamination.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Olga Parshina

Togliatti State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: parshinaod@mail.ru
Rússia, Togliatti

Bibliografia

  1. Baranov A. N. Vvedenie v prikladnuyu lingvistiku [Introduction to Applied Linguistics]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2021. 368 p.
  2. Bychkova V. S. [On the issue of semantic and pragmatic features of the female nomination “provincial” in modern Russian]. Sostoyanie i perspektivy lingvisticheskoi i metodicheskoi mysli v sovremennom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Samara, OOO “Nauchno-tekhnicheskii tsentr” Publ., 2022, pp. 108–119. (In Russ.)
  3. Fokina O. V. [Intertextuality in the print media: paradigmatic aspect]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Seriya “Istoriya, filologiya”, 2013, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 96–102. (In Russ.)
  4. Guseinova T. S. [Problematic segmentation as a way to create phraseological transformations]. Chronos: obshchestvennye nauki, 2020, no. 2 (19), pp. 37–38. (In Russ.)
  5. Ivanyan E. P. [Characteristics of the traditions of designating the russian province with proprietary units]. Rusistika bez granits, 2022a, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 44–55. (In Russ.)
  6. Ivanyan E. P. [On the Issue of Proprietary Units of the Russian Province]. Nauka i kul'tura Rossii, 2022b, vol. 1, pp. 119–122. (In Russ.)
  7. Kalashnikova L. V. [In search of meaning. Investigation of Nonsense Works Using the Golden Section Rule]. Teoriya yazyka i mezhkul’turnaya kommunikatsiya, 2021, no. 2 (41), pp. 96–104. (In Russ.)
  8. Kosareva A. A. [Precedence and Intertextuality of Newspaper Discourse]. Nauka, obrazovanie i dukhovnost’ v kontekste kontseptsii ustoichivogo razvitiya: materialy vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Ukhta, Ukhta State Technical University Publ., 2017, vol. II, pp. 217–221. (In Russ.)
  9. Kumova S. V., Shabanova N. A. [On the issue of territorial branding of the modern russian city]. Regionologiya, 2015, no. 3 (92), pp. 22–32. (In Russ.)
  10. Musinova N. E. [The principle of the “Golden section” in the poetry of acmeism]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya, 2009, no. 5 (17), pp. 75–76. (In Russ.)
  11. Nosaeva O. R., Slezko E. B. [Repertory and role of the precedent phenomena in different age groups]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Problemy yazykoznaniya i pedagogiki, 2017, no. 2, pp. 77–86. (In Russ.)
  12. Parshina O. D. [About one transformation of the precedent phenomenon “v derevnyu, k tetke, v glush’, v Saratov” in the nomination of the province]. Russkii yazyk: obrazovanie, nauka, kul’tura: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-metodicheskoi sessii. Moscow, Moscow State Pedagogical University Publ., 2022a, pp. 160–168. (In Russ.)
  13. Parshina O. D. [The precedent phenomenon “the growth up due to a province”: the issue posing]. Aktual’nye voprosy sovremennoi filologii i zhurnalistiki, 2020, no. 3 (38), pp. 87–96. (In Russ.)
  14. Parshina O. D. [Russian hinterland: the linguistic explication of the semantics of the province]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2022b, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 3859–3868. (In Russ.)
  15. Parshina O. D. Semantics ambiguity: Russian linguistic world-image for “province” lexical unit. O. D. Parshina, I. V. Gurova, S. A. Gudkova. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences: Proceedings of the International Conference “Humanity in the Era of Uncertainty” (ICHEU 2021), Samara, October 21–23, 2021. Vol. 119. Samara, 2021, pp. 220–227. (In Eng.)
  16. Savchenko A. V., Khmelevskii M. S. [“Cities and villages” in Russian phraseology in the conceptual and linguo-cultural coverage]. Mir russkogo slova, 2020, no. 4, pp. 56–65. (In Russ.)
  17. Serov V. Ehntsiklopedicheskii slovar’ krylatykh slov i vyrazhenii [Encyclopedic Dictionary of winged words and expressions]. Moscow, Lokid-press Publ., 2004, 877 p.
  18. Severskaya O. I. [Komar ‘Mosquito’ as an Inspirator and Co-author of G. R. Derzhavin, A. Parschikov, Yu. Arabov]. Russian Speech, 2022, no. 6, pp. 81–93. (In Russ.)
  19. Sidorenko K. P. [«Gore ot uma» in Russian speech]. Vestnik Gertsenovskogo universiteta, 2009, no. 11 (73), pp. 40–45. (In Russ.)
  20. Shcherbakova M. V., Golovina E. V. [The proportion of the golden section as the basis of a self-organizing text structure]. Novaya nauka: Teoreticheskii i prakticheskii vzglyad, 2017, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 157–160. (In Russ.)
  21. Yudina V. I. [Regional culture as an object of modern scientific discourse. On the problem of definitions]. Obrazovanie i kul’turnoe prostranstvo, 2020, no. 1, pp. 99–109. (In Russ.)

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies