Motivational Aspects of Demographic Behavior of the Population in Post-Soviet Countries
- 作者: Roslavtseva M.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute for Demographic Research FCTAS RAS
- 期: 卷 5, 编号 3 (2025)
- 页面: 25-44
- 栏目: Family and fertility
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2782-2303/article/view/356022
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/demis.2025.5.3.2
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVCFOP
- ID: 356022
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The article presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between human motivational activities, presented as key value orientations, such as attitude towards family, subjective health and life satisfaction, and key demographic indicators, such as fertility, mortality, marriage and divorce, natural growth, etc., in post-Soviet countries, based on World Values Survey (WVS) data and national statistics from 1990 to 2021. Pearson correlation coefficients have been calculated between the changes in various categories of responses to questions about value and changes in demographic indicators in countries of the Former USSR, including Russia, Ukraine, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan. The results indicate strong and statistically significant correlations between changes in well-being and demographic trends, such as increased birth rates and decreased mortality, when family values strengthen and life satisfaction increases. Conversely, weakening traditional attitudes leads to demographic decline. Mechanisms underlying these relationships are discussed in the context of second demographic transition theory. Results are compared to international studies using WVS data, suggesting the importance of population value systems as a motivational basis for success in state demographic policies, as there is a statistical correlation between values and resulting demographic behaviors. This conclusion extends to measures related to not only reproductive attitudes and birth rates, but also subjective well-being, self-preserving behaviors, and other demographic outcomes.
作者简介
Maria Roslavtseva
Institute for Demographic Research FCTAS RAS
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: maria.roslavtseva@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3947-1793
SPIN 代码: 3221-1093
Researcher ID: AAE-1252-2022
Junior Researcher Moscow, Russia
参考
- Ярмоленко, Л. В. Социологический аспект исследования демографического поведения // Таврический научный обозреватель. 2016. № 1–1 (6). С. 125–129. EDN VLKDGD.
- Рославцева, М. В. Ценностная проблематика в национальных проектах Российской Федерации // Наука. Культура. Общество. 2025. Т. 31, № 2. С. 129–144. doi: 10.19181/nko.2025.31.2.10. EDN BAYVWD.
- Herre, B. Family is Very Important to People Around the World // Our World in Data. 2024.
- Koshy, P. Higher Education and the Importance of Values: Evidence from the World Values Survey / P. Koshy, H. Cabalu, V. Valencia // Higher Education. 2022. Vol. 85, No. 6. Pp. 1401–1426. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00896-8.
- Inglehart, R. Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values // R. Inglehart, W. E. Baker // American Sociological Review. 2000. Vol. 65, No. 1. Pp. 19–51. doi: 10.2307/2657288.
- Антонов, А. И. Ценности семейно-детного образа жизни (СеДОЖ–2019): Аналитический отчет по результатам межрегионального социолого-демографического исследования / А. И. Антонов, В. М. Карпова, С. В. Ляликова [и др.]. Москва : МАКС Пресс, 2020. 486 c. ISBN 978-5-317-06320-7. doi: 10.29003/m857.SeDOJ-2019.
- Lorem, G. Self-Reported Health as a Predictor of Mortality: A Cohort Study of its Relation to other Health Measurements and Observation Time // G. Lorem, S. Cook, D. A. Leon [et al.] // Scientific Reports. 2020. Vol. 10, No. 4886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61603-0.
- Helliwell, J. F. World Happiness Report 2023 / J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, J. D. Sachs, [et al.]. New York : Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2023. ISBN 978-1-7348080-5-6. 166 p.
- Diener, E. Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index // American Psychologist. 2000. Vol. 55 (1). Pp. 34–43. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.
- Гудкова, Т. Б. Концептуализация второго демографического перехода: эвристический потенциал и ограничения теории // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2018. № 43. С. 123–136. doi: 10.17223/1998863X/43/12. EDN XWEBPF.
- Lesthaeghe, R. The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition // Population and Development Review. 2010. Vol. 36. Pp. 211–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x.
- Kurilo, I. O. Emancipative Values and Reproductive Behavior in the Context of Demographic Modernization (Based on World Values Survey 2017–2020 data) // Demography and Social Economy. 2021. Vol. 2. Pp. 37–52. doi: 10.15407/dse2021.02.037.
- Карабчук, Т. С. Количество детей и семейные ценности: существуют ли когортные различия в Европе? / T. C. Карабчук, А. П. Кечетова // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2017. № 5 (141). С. 251–270. doi: 10.14515/monitoring.2017.5.14. EDN YLYOBO.
- LaPiere, R. T. Attitudes vs. Actions // Social Forces. 1934. Vol. 13, No. 2. Pp. 230–237. doi: 10.2307/2570339.
- Лапин, Н. И. Динамика ценностей населения реформируемой России // Вестник Российского гуманитарного научного фонда. 1996. № 2. С. 141–150. EDN CYIAGM.
- Антонов, А. И. Современные демографические тенденции и аналитические прогнозы, проблемы семейно-демографической политики в социальном государстве // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 18. Социология и политология. 2010. № 4. С. 134–150. EDN NCQBHZ.
- Veenhoven, R. Greater Happiness for a Greater Number: Is that Possible and Desirable? // Journal of Happiness Studies. 2010. Vol. 11. P. 605–629. doi: 10.1007/s10902-010-9204-z.
- Vogl, T. S. Differential fertility makes society more conservative on family values // T. S. Vogl, J. Freese // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2020. Vol. 117, No. 14. Pp. 7696–7701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918006117.
补充文件

