Research Institute as a Functional Unit of Scientific Activities
- Authors: Chernysh M.F.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the RAS
- Issue: Vol 7, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 13-28
- Section: Scientific policy
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2686-827X/article/view/289755
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2025.7.1.1
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OIKYXK
- ID: 289755
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The development of Russian science gave birth to a system of organizations that were tangibly different from the institutions of science in the West embedded in universities. The main element of the system is a research institute. In the Soviet times founding the institutes under the auspices of the Academy of concentrating staff and material resources in the chosen directions. Higher education institutions were also engaged in research, but their main task consisted in training professional cadres for the rapidly expanding Soviet economy. The public consciousness and Russian culture as a whole viewed and keeps viewing a research institute as a key element in the production of scientific knowledge and a place that employs real researchers whose whole life is dedicated to science. In the institutional order that emerged in the post-Soviet times the institute fulfills a number of important functions. Firstly, the institute is engaged in the production of authentic scientific knowledge using traditional research methods to verify it through standard procedures. Secondly, the institute is charged with the task of reproducing the community of researchers “demographically” and ideologically as a group of people who share the values of scientific endeavor. Thirdly, the institute plays a decisive role in communication with society as a whole, passing on in abridged form the essence of scientific discovery. The reforms of Russian science as part of the general policy of destroying old Soviet institutions did not bring about any improvements in the Russian science complex. Their effects were opposite to what they were set to achieve inflicting heavy damage on the entire realm of research complex.
About the authors
Mikhail F. Chernysh
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the RAS
Email: chernysh@fnisc.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8169-0933
SPIN-code: 7057-8292
ResearcherId: B-5133-2016
Corresponding member of the RAS, Doctor of Sociology, Director Moscow, Russia
References
- Ferguson N. Civilization: The West and the rest. London : Penguin Books, 2018. xxx, 402 p. ISBN 9780141987934.
- Smelser N. J., Lipset S. M. Social structure, mobility and development // Social structure and mobility in economic development. Chicago : Aldine Publishing Co., 1966. P. 1–50.
- Inkeles A. Social stratification and mobility in the Soviet Union // Class, status, and power: Social stratification in comparative perspective / ed. by R. Bendix, S. M. Lipset. New York : The Free Press ; London : Collier Macmillan Publishers, 1966. P. 516–526.
- Вайль П., Генис А. 60-е. Мир советского человека. М. : Новое литературное обозрение, 1998. 358 с. ISBN 5-86793-052-1.
- Кун Т. Структура научных революций / пер. с англ. М. : АСТ, 2003. 605, [3] с. ISBN 5-17-010707-2. EDN QWFEIT.
- Stinchcombe A. L. Stratification and organization : Selected papers. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1986. viii, 381 p. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511570759.
- Латур Б. Дайте мне лабораторию, и я переверну мир // Логос. 2002. № 5–6 (35). С. 1–32.
- Turner J. H. The institutional order: Economy, kinship, religion, polity, law, and education in evolutionary and comparative perspective. New York : Longman, 1997. xiii, 306 p. ISBN 9780673981257.
- North D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1990. viii, 152 p. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678.
- Аджемоглу Д., Робинсон Дж. А. Почему одни страны богатые, а другие бедные. Происхождение власти, процветания и нищеты. М : АСТ, 2015. 692, [1] с. ISBN 978-5-17-092736-4.
- Fukuyama F. Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. London : Profile Books, 2015. viii, 664 p. ISBN 9781846684371.
- Hamilton W. H. The institutional approach to economic theory // The American Economic Review. 1919. Vol. 9, № 1 (Supplement). P. 309–318.
- Кивинен М. Прогресс и хаос: социологический анализ прошлого и будущего России / пер. с англ.: М. Ф. Черныш. СПб. : Академический проект, 2001. 272 с. ISBN 5-7331-0246-2.
Supplementary files



