A Model for Describing the Management Processes in the Scientific Sector. Verification
- Authors: Shepelev G.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Research and Academic Centre “Kuzbass”
- Issue: Vol 6, No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 65-79
- Section: Mechanisms of a state regulation of a scientific activity
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2686-827X/article/view/268007
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2024.6.1.4
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KZBHTC
- ID: 268007
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The model of management in the scientific sector presented in the previous article, as well as some alternative models applied to the organization of science management are used to interpret various statistical data. The article also considers intersectoral comparisons of science financing in countries of different levels of economic development, including the costs of basic research. It is shown that the correlation between science costs and gross domestic product (GDP) is 32.9% in more than 120 countries of the world and GDP per capita is 50.9%. They are not statistically significant. On average, the share of basic study costs in domestic research and development expenses does not depend on the level of wealth of countries. This allows us to conclude in favor of a mutually consistent management model in the scientific sector. The author analyzes the dynamics of the number of researchers and small enterprises in the sector of science and scientific services, as well as the dynamics of the number of academic employees in the sectors of science in the 1990s. It is demonstrated that the decrease in their number mainly occurred in the applied sectors and to a lesser extent in the fundamental research sector. These data are described more fully by the proposed mutually consistent model of science than by the alternative models. Possible adjustments in the organization of the scientific sector management system are examined, including in terms of changes in input impacts on the science sector, output indicators characterizing its effectiveness, as well as changes in the organization of the scientific sector and management bodies, which follow from the considered mutually agreed management model in this sector of the economy.
About the authors
Gennady V. Shepelev
Research and Academic Centre “Kuzbass”
Email: shepelev-2@mail.ru
Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Leading Specialist Kemerovo, Russia
References
- Шепелев Г. В. Модель для описания процессов управления научным сектором. Основные положения // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2023. Т. 5, № 4. С. 71–90. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.4.4. EDN GTLGBB.
- Шепелев Г. В. О финансировании научного сектора (межстрановые сопоставления) // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2021. Т. 3, № 1. С. 15–34. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.1.1. EDN BAMWHP.
- Шепелев Г. В. О финансировании науки государством и бизнесом (межстрановые сопоставления) // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2021. Т. 3, № 2. С. 15–39. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2021.3.2.1. EDN DQOLKT.
- Шепелев Г. В. Требования к системе российских публикаций в условиях санкционного давления // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2022. Т. 4, № 3. С. 105–128. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.3.8. EDN GFRAXT.
- Шепелев Г. В. Энергопереход: подходы к формированию повестки исследований для российской науки // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2022. Т. 4, № 1. С. 101–121. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2022.4.1.6. EDN FBJQMN.
- КНТП: уроки реализации первого этапа и дальнейшие перспективы / Г. В. Шепелев, Н. А. Миронов, М. В. Сергеев, И. М. Сергеев // Инноватика и экспертиза: научные труды. 2021. № 2 (32). С. 101–120. doi: 10.35264/1996-2274-2021-2-101-120. EDN WTRGJD.
Supplementary files
