Enviar artigo por via de e-mail The Institutionalization of English Language Hegemony in the United States of America
- Autores: MARUSENKO M.1, Marusenko N.1
-
Afiliações:
- St. Petersburg State University
- Edição: Nº 4 (2024)
- Páginas: 35–51
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2686-6730/article/view/257337
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686673024040032
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SBOFWL
- ID: 257337
Citar
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Resumo
The article analyzes measures to institutionalize the hegemonic position of English in the United States. The desire of some states to give English an official status is explained by demographic and socio-economic problems: the growing share of African-American and Hispanic population, as well as economic problems of immigrant communities. General American, a standardized version of English, is proposed as a tool to improve the living standards of nonEnglish speakers and create a common American identity, which in the future should take over the functions of the national language.
Texto integral
Sobre autores
M. MARUSENKO
St. Petersburg State University
Email: mamikhail@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0441-7845
Scopus Author ID: 38261631100
Researcher ID: H-8007-2013
Doctor of Sciences (Philology), Professor St. Petersburg
N. Marusenko
St. Petersburg State University
Email: nmm.spb@gmail.com
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3347-1373
Scopus Author ID: 57212655940
Researcher ID: N-6015-2015
Candidate of Sciences (Philology), Associate Professor St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Bibliografia
- Laperre E. There’s no such thing as Standard English. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/2020/02/24/no-such-thing-as-standard-english/ (accessed 02.12.2023).
- Native American Languages Act (Public Law 101-477). Available at: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/101/s2167 (accessed 30.11.2013).
- Nieto D. G. Making It Official: The Institutionalization of the Hegemony of English in the USA. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 2021. Vol. 29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5741 (accessed 26.01.2024).
- Nordquist R. Standard English (SE). Glossary of Grammatical and Rhetorical Terms. Available at: https://www.thoughtco.com/standard-english-1692137 (accessed 01.12.2023).
- Standard English. Available at: https://www.hellovaia.com/explanations/english/international-english/standard-english/ (accessed 07.12.2023).
- Statement of purpose: Founding document of the English Plus information Clearinghouse (EPIC). Available at: http://www.massenglishplus.org/mep/engplus.html (accessed 29.11.2023).
- Strevens Model of English. StudySmarter GmbH, 2023. Available at: https://www.studysmarter.co.uk/explanations/english/international-english/strevens-model-of-english/ (accessed 03.12.2023).
- U.S. English: Making English the official language. Available at: https://www.usenglish.org/legislation/state (accessed 28.11.2023).
- Бурдьë П. 2005. Формы капитала. Экономическая социология. Том 6. № 3. С. 60-74.
- Марусенко М. А. 2013. Внутренний языковой империализм США: от «плавильного котла» к «салатнице». США Канада: экономика, политика, культура. №10. С. 46-62.
- Марусенко М. А. 2014. Внешний языковой империализм США. США Канада: экономика, политика, культура. № 6 (534). С. 31-44.
- Марусенко М. А. 2016. Американская языковая идеология. США Канада: экономика, политика, культура. № 11 (563). С. 1-10.
- August, D., Shanahan, T. 2006. Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Erlbaum. 688 р.
- Baugh, A.C., Cable, T. 2002. A History of the English Language. 5th ed. Prentice Hall. 464 p.
- Bartolomé, L. 2008. Understanding policy for equity in teaching and learning: A critical historical lens. Language Arts. Vol. 85 (5). P. 376-381.
- Bourdieu, P. 2005. Forms of capital. Economic sociology. Vol. 6. № 3. P. 60-74.
- Crystal, D. 2003. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press. 582 p.
- Del Valle, S. 2003. Language rights and the law in the United States: Finding our Voices (Bilingual Education & Bilingualism). Multilingual Matters. 376 p.
- Donahue, T.S. 2002. Language planning and the perils of ideological solipsism. J. W. Tollefson (Ed). Language policies in education: Critical issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Р. 137-164.
- Jespersen, O. 1925. Mankind, nation and individual from a linguistic point of view. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co. 232 p.
- van Haeringen, C.B. 1924. Eenheid en nuance in beschaafd-Nederlandse uitspraak. De Nieuwe Taalgids. № 18. Р. 65–66.
- Haugen, E. 1972. The ecology of languages (Language Science and National Development). Stanford University Press. 366 p.
- Laitin, D., Reich, R. 2003. A liberal democratic approach to language justice. W. Kymlycka, A. Patten (Eds). Language rights and political theory. Oxford University Press. Р. 80-104.
- Marusenko, M.A. 2013. Internal linguistic imperialism of the USA: from the “melting pot” to the “salad bowl”. USA & Canada: economics, politics, culture. № 10. P. 46-62.
- Marusenko, M.A. 2014. External linguistic imperialism of the USA. USA & Canada: economics, politics, culture. № 6 (534). P. 31-44.
- Marusenko, M.A. 2016. American language ideology. USA & Canada: economics, politics, culture. № 11 (563). P. 1-10.
- Ricento, T. 2019. Introduction. In: T. Ricento (Ed). Language politics and policies: Perspectives from Canada and the United States. Cambridge University Press. Р. 1-24.
- Rumbaut, R.G., Massey, D., Bean, F.D. 2006. Linguistic life expectancies: Immigrant language retention in southern California. Population and Development Review. Vol. 32. P. 447-460.
- Trudgill, T. 2000. The Dialects of England. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons. 168 p.
- Wiley, T.G. 2014. Diversity, super-diversity and monolingual language ideology in the United States: Tolerance or intolerance? Review of Research in Education. Vol. 38 (1). P. 24–55.
- Wiley, T.G. 2004. Language planning, language policy and the English-only movement. In: E. Finegan, J. R. Rickford (Eds). Language in the USA: Perspectives for the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press. Р. 319-338.
