Wind and solar energy effect in Canada

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study of the achieved effect of reducing CO2 emissions when replacing coal and oil with wind and solar energy. The concept of determining the achieved savings developed by the author is described in detail. The author's methodology and step-by-step calculations with comments are presented. The calculations are based on the actual amount of the fee for CO2 emissions, taking into account the damage caused, the number of people saved from premature death due to CO2 emissions, the economic cost of living determined by the World Bank for Canada, health care costs due to concomitant diseases, the social discount rate. This makes it possible for the first time to determine the real socio-economic effect of replacing fossil energy sources with cleaner energy carriers. Generation prices are compared. An argument is presented that refutes the arguments about the increase in costs in the economy, which may occur due to an increase in fees for harmful CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. Taking into account the economic cost of life, health care costs, social discount rates, carbon charges in Canada, it was possible to prevent the premature death of 11,307 people in six years, i.e. more than 5 people per 10 thousand inhabitants of the country. The total savings of the resources under consideration during this period amounted to almost 122 billion USD. In the conditions of the energy crisis, coal mines were partially deconserved to temporarily replace less carbon-intensive natural gas at power plants. I believe that this is a temporary and forced measure, associated with negative environmental consequences, which, of course, will lead to human and economic losses. The results obtained make it possible to establish more accurate benchmarks to justify the construction of wind and solar power plants, and to use hydrocarbon resources more efficiently.

About the authors

Victor D. Gazman

National Research University Higher School of Economics

Email: vgazman@hse.ru
Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Газман В.Д. (2022) Потенциал возобновляемой энергетики: монография. ИД ВШЭ, Москва, Россия, 359 с. doi: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2573-9
  2. Смил В. Энергия и цивилизация: от первобытности до наших дней. М.: Эксмо, 2020, 480 с.
  3. Christoph Kost, Shivenes Shamugam, Verena Julch, NguenTran Nguen, Thomas Schlegl Levelized Cost of Electricity Renewable Energy Technologies. Freiburg: Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (ISE), 2018, March. 42 P. Available at: https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/en/documents/publications/studies/EN2018_Fraunhofer-ISE_LCOE_Renewable_Energy_Technologies.pdf (accessed: 12.12.2022).
  4. Frank Ackerman (2007) Debating Climate Economics: The Stern Review vs. Its Critics Report to Friends of the Earth-UK - Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University, USA, July 2007. 24 P. Available at: https://www.bu.edu/eci/files/2019/06/SternDebateReport.pdf (accessed: 08.02.2023).
  5. Katharine Ricke, Laurent Drouet, Ken Caldeira, Massimo Tavoni (2018) Country-level social cost of carbon. - Nature Climat Change, 2018, Vol. 8, October. pp. 895-900. doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0282-y
  6. Mingweq Li, Da Zhang, Chiao-Ting Li, Kathleen M. Mulvaney, Noelle E. Selin, Valerie J. Karplus (2018) Air quality co-benefits of carbon pricing in China. - Nature Climate Change, Vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 398-403. (doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0139-4)
  7. Nicholas Stern (2008) Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate Change / The London School of Economics and Political Science. 2008. 56 P. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609244114 Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/19617/1/Key_Elements_of_a_Global_Deal-Final_version%282%29_with_additional_edits_post_launch.pdf (accessed: 12.12.2022).
  8. R. Daniel Bressler. The mortality cost of carbon - Nature Communications (2021) vol. 12: 4467 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24487-w Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24487-w (accessed: 31.12.2022).
  9. Simon Dietz, Nicholas Stern (2015) Endogenous Growth, Convexity of Damage and Climate Risk: How Nordhaus' Framework Supports Deep Cuts in Carbon Emissions. - The Economic Journal, Vol. 125, no. 583, March 2015, pp. 574-620. (https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12188).
  10. Simon Dietz, Nicholas Stern (2015) Endogenous Growth, Convexity of Damage and Climate Risk: How Nordhaus' Framework Supports Deep Cuts in Carbon Emissions. - The Economic Journal, Vol. 125, no. 583, March 2015, pp. 574-620. (https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12188).
  11. William D. Nordhaus (2017) Revisiting the social cost of carbon. PNAS, National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 31, 2017, pp. 1518-1523. Available at: https://www.pnas.org/content/114/7/1518 (accessed: 12.12.2022).
  12. W. Kip Viscusi, Clayton J. Masterman (2017) Income Elasticities and Global Values of a Statistical Life. Cambridge University Press, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2017, Vol. 8, no 2, pp. 226-250. doi: 10.1017/bca.2017.12

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies