Psychological well-being of students in the digital educational environment: psychodiagnostic approaches and pedagogical perspectives
- Authors: Lukashenko D.V1
-
Affiliations:
- Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
- Issue: Vol 8, No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 110-115
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-3313/article/view/377433
- ID: 377433
Cite item
Abstract
this article addresses the urgent issue of developing critical thinking skills in high school students within the context of digitalized education. The study analyzes the opportunities and challenges associated with integrating digital technologies into the educational process. The authors examine the cognitive, motivational, and affective aspects of critical thinking and how digitalization influences each of these components. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, including a review of scientific literature, pedagogical observation, student surveys, focus group interviews with teachers, and a pedagogical experiment. The findings indicate that digital technologies can both facilitate and hinder the development of critical thinking in high school students. While they provide access to vast amounts of information and tools for processing it, they can also contribute to superficial analysis, decreased motivation to learn, and the formation of uncritical information consumption habits. The authors propose recommendations for improving the educational process aimed at developing critical thinking in the digital environment. These recommendations include the use of active learning methods, the development of critical information evaluation skills, and advanced training for educators.
References
- Бабаева Ю.Д., Войскунский А.Е., Солдатова Г.У. Психологические последствия цифровизации образования // Психологическая наука и образование. 2022. № 27 (1). С. 5 – 18. doi: 10.17759/pse.2022270101.
- Bochaver A.A., Khromov A.I., Khoroshev K.S., Pelgunov A.V. Development and Validation of the Digital Learning Environment Engagement Scale (DLEES) // Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2021. № 14 (4). P. 161 – 177. doi: 10.11621/pir.2021.0409
- Bylieva D., Lobanov O., Rubtsova N. Psychological risks of digitalization of education. In E3S Web of Conferences 2020 (Vol. 110, p.02048). EDP Sciences. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/201911002048.
- Cacioppo J.T., Hawkley L.C. Perceived social isolation and cognition // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2009. № 13 (10). P. 447 – 454. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.005
- Кисельникова Н.В., Тимохина Т.В., Хуанг Х. Влияние цифровой образовательной среды на проявления академической прокрастинации у студентов вуза // Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: «Образование, здравоохранение, физическая культура». 2019. № 19 (4). С. 6 – 12. doi: 10.14529/ozfk190401
- Маслова О.А., Цукерман Г.А., Шишкова Л.Ю. Готовность педагогов к использованию цифровых технологий в начальной школе. Психологическая наука и образование. 2020. № 25 (2). С. 5 – 17. doi: 10.17759/pse.2020250201
- Prinsloo P., Slade S. Learning analytics and student success: Discourse, dilemmas and directions // British Journal of Educational Technology. 2014. № 45 (4). P. 592 – 602. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12108
- Romero C., L?pez-Pernas S., Guenaga M., Silla C.N., Venturelli M. Learning analytics in online learning environments: A systematic review of recent research trends (2016-2019) // Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020. № 68 (5). P. 1215 – 1242. doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09880-0
- Selwyn N. Digital teaching and learning in higher education. Society for Research into Higher Education & McGraw-Hill Open University Press, 2011. 358 p.
- Siemens G., Ga?evi? D. Learning analytics: Ecology, complexity, and boundaries. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, 2012. P. 113 – 116. doi: 10.1145/2330576.2330616
- Sweller J. Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.) // The psychology of learning and motivation. 2011. Vol. 55. P. 1 – 37. Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00001-8
- Twenge J.M. iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy – and completely unlike millennials. Atria Books. 2000. 426p.
- Van Deursen A.J., Bolle C.L., Hegner Y., Kommers P.A. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional experiences, social norms, self-regulation, and self-efficacy // Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. № 69. P. 428 – 440. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.005
- Хуанг Х., Кисельникова Н.В., Тимохина Т.В. (Цифровая усталость как фактор риска психологического благополучия студентов в условиях дистанционного обучения // Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного университета. Серия: «Психология». 2021. № 14 (3). С. 40 – 48. doi: 10.14529/psy210305
Supplementary files
