Email this article Pragmatic aspects of audio description
- Authors: Bondarenko V.D1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State University for the Humanities
- Issue: No 9 (2025)
- Pages: 71-75
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2618-7175/article/view/373272
- ID: 373272
Cite item
Abstract
the article examines pragmatic aspects of audio description, as well as the expectations of its end users – people with visual impairments (blind and partially sighted). Based on the analysis of international research (including data from the ADLAB PRO project) and theoretical work, key aspects affecting the perception and efficiency of AD are identified: the degree and nature of visual impairments, requirements for the language of description (simplicity of syntax, choice of vocabulary, narrative viability), as well as the potential for using a language, that is easy to understand. Special attention is paid to the need to take into account the heterogeneity of the target audience and to develop strategies for creating an AD that ensures equal access to cultural events and improves the quality of life of users. The article highlights the relevance of AD research in the field of Russian science and practice in the context of implementing the principles of universal design and providing an accessible environment.
Keywords
References
- Раздуев А.В., Олимурадов О.В. Особенности использования терминологических единиц в аудиодескрипциях статичных объектов [Электронный ресурс] // Актуальные проблемы филологии и педагогической лингвистики. 2025. № 1. С. 151 – 164. Режим доступа: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-ispolzovaniya-terminologicheskih-edinits-v-audiodeskriptsiyah-statichnyh-obektov (дата обращения: 29.04.2025)
- Борщевский И.С. Аудиодескрипция (тифлокомментирование) как вид перевода // Филология и лингвистика. 2018. № 3 (9). С. 48 – 52. Режим доступа: https://moluch.ru/th/6/archive/107/3755/ (дата обращения: 30.04.2025)
- ADLAB PRO. Audio description professional: Profile definition [Электронный ресурс]. 2017. P. 3 – 7. Режим доступа: https://www.adlabproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/IO2-REPORT-Final.pdf (дата обращения: 30.04.2025)
- Bernab? R., Orero P. Easy to read as multimode accessibility service // Hermeneus. 2019. № 21. P. 53 – 74.
- Cutts M. The Oxford Guide to Plain English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 56 – 57.
- Fresno N., Castella J., Soler Vilageliu O. ‘What should I say?’ Tentative criteria to prioritize information in the audio description of film characters // Researching audio description. New approaches / ed. by A. Matamala, P. Orero. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. P. 143 – 167.
- Glenn E.C., Emmert P., Emmert V. A scale for measuring listenability: The factors that determine listening ease and difficulty // International Journal of Listening. 1995. Vol. 9. № 1. P. 44 – 61.
- Maa?, C. Easy language – Plain language – Easy language plus. Balancing comprehensibility and acceptability. Berlin: Frank & Timme, 2020. P. 45 – 50.
- Perego E. Accessible communication: A cross-country journey. Berlin: Frank & Timme, 2020. P. 82 – 74.
- Taylor C., Perego E. The Routledge Handbook of Audio Description. A users. Linguistic needs and inclusivity. New York: Routledge, 2022. P. 38 – 55.
- Remael A., Reviers N., Vercauteren G. Pictures Painted in Words: ADLAB audio description guidelines. Trieste: EUT, 2015. P. 15 – 23.
- Snyder J. ‘The visual made verbal // The Didactics of Audiovisual Translation / ed. by J. D?az-Cintas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2008. P. 191 – 198.
Supplementary files
