On the question of the linguistic and cultural features of the Eastern Argumentative Model in Political Ecology
- Authors: Barebina N.S.1, Fan Z.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 10 (2023)
- Pages: 15-27
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2454-0749/article/view/370223
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0749.2023.10.43598
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AXXUES
- ID: 370223
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The article discusses the issues of argumentation of the environmental agenda, which occupies a significant place in the modern linguistic society and is implemented in various discursive practices. The authors proceed from the fact that the environmental problem is a universal topic that is approved by all people. Therefore, the discussion of environmental problems has a great unifying force. The reaction of the audience to the discussion of environmental plans is always predictable, this topic is approved by all segments of the population. It can be said that the media and politicians always make the most of environmental issues. The combination of political speech and ecology, covered in the media, is a synergistic effect when the sum of the components is greater than a simple addition: 1+1+1→5. The synergy of politics and ecology is the object of this work, and the subject of the study are argumentative structures that provide this synergy. The article contains a review of works showing the specifics of logic and the philosophical tradition of China, which were the basis for specific models of reasoning that make up the Eastern model of argumentation. The purpose of the work is to analyze the argumentation in the speeches of Chinese politicians on the environmental topic and to monitor the implementation of the Eastern or Western model of argumentation. The main conclusions of the article are conclusions about the universality of the Western style of argumentation, which is implemented in arguments about environmental problems. The authors also point out the undesirability of leveling argumentation styles. The novelty of the work lies in the fact that these conclusions, being projected on the field of political ecology, allow us to conclude that the linguistic and cultural characteristics of each country affect the implementation of environmental policy. The authors' contribution to the research of the topic consists in a comparative analysis of the Eastern and Western styles of argumentation and in observing the implementation of one of them in ecological topos in Chinese.
About the authors
Natal'ya Sergeevna Barebina
Email: svirel23@rambler.ru
Zhiyong Fan
Email: fangzhiyong1979@mail.ru
References
Волков В.А. Политическая экология как проект: между идеологией и политической религией // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2022. № 481. С. 77–83. Minch M. Political Ecology // Encyclopedia of Global Justice / D.K. Chatterjee (eds). Springer, Dordrecht. 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_119 Roberts J. “Political ecology” / The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology / F. Stein (ed.). 2023. URL: http://doi.org/10.29164/20polieco Чернявская В. Е., Молодыченко Е.Н. Речевое воздействие в политическом, рекламном и интернет-дискурсе: учебник. М.: Ленанд, 2023. Довгиленко Г.А. Тема экологии в политической борьбе парламентских партий Швеции // Проблемы национальной стратегии. 2022. № 4 (73). С. 131–150. Ивченко Т.В., Куприянова Ю. А. Новые концепты строительства китайской экоцивилизации // Иностранные языки в высшей школе. 2018. № 4 (47). С. 101–111. Баребина Н.С. Лингвистическая аргументология : учеб. пособие / Под науч. ред. Г. М. Костюшкиной. Иркутск : «Оттиск», 2021. – 124 с. Борзова Е. П., Исаев Б.А. Восток и Запад: сравнительный анализ культур // Труды Санкт-Петербургского государственного института культуры / Вып. 4: Восток и Запад: сборник статей; научн. ред. Б. И. Рашрагович, Б. А. Исаев. – СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУКИ, 2010. С 282–310. Крушинский А. А. Логика «И цзина». Дедукция в древнем Китае. М.: Издат. фирма «Вост. лит.» РАН, 1999. – 173 с. Мадалимов Т. А. Основные черты логики древнего Востока // “Science and Education” Scientific Journal. 2020. Volume 1. Issue 4. P. 236–241. Крушинский А. А. Логика Древнего Китая // Философский журнал. 2016. Т. 9. № 4. С. 111–127. Willman M. D. Logic and Language in Early Chinese Philosophy // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy / E. N. Zalta, U. Nodelman (eds.). Stanford University. 2022. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2022/entries/chinese-logic-language/ Garrett M. M. Classical Chinese Conceptions of Argumentation and Persuasion // Argumentation and Advocacy. 1993. 29(3). Pp. 105–15. Крючкова С.Е., Крючкова Е. В. Искусство аргументации в Древнем Китае // Философская мысль. 2023. № 4. С. 1–18. doi: 10.25136/2409-8728.2023.4.40030 Ding H. Confucius’s Virtue-Centered Rhetoric: A Case Study of Mixed Research Methods in Comparative Rhetoric // Rhetoric Review. 2007. Vol. 26, No. 2. Pp. 142–159. Johnstone H. W. Some Reflections on Argumentation // Logique et Analyse. 1963. Vol. 6 (21). P. 30–39. Барабошкин К. Е. Ван Чун (I в. н.э.). Взвешивание суждений. Глава «О превосходстве и необычности». Перевод и комментарий // Вестн. Моск. Ун-та. Сер. 13. Востоковедение. 2015. № 3. С. 79–91. Eemeren F. H. van, Haaften T. van. The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View // Argumentation. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09618-5 Ли Е. В. К вопросу об универсальных ценностных основаниях argumentum ad hominem в политическом дискурсе (на примере корейского и русского языков) // Вестник Иркутского государственного лингвистического университета. Сер. Филология. 2010. №3. С. 117–125. Бургете А. М. Р., Герасимова И.А. Понятийный европоцентризм: за и против // Философские науки. 2019. Т. 6. № 6. С. 11–33.
Supplementary files

