Exploring the Impact of Process-genre Approach on Learners’ Academic Writing and Higher Order Thinking Skills

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Background. The study of using process-genre approach that was used to increase the writing competence had been conducted by many researchers. However, the contirbution of this learning approach for HOTs aspects has not been done by many researchers, especially on learning writing Indonesian

Purpose. Many studies only focused on one research approach, consequently, the finding was not quite comprehensive. Besides, to examine the effect of process-genre approach on academic writing competence and HOTs, this research also aimed to explore attitude and students’ expectation on their learning experience by using this approach.

Method. The research used a sequential, mixed-method explanatory approach. Two grades were randomly chosen to enroll in the experimental class and a monitoring class of up to 52 students. The individual is a member of the Indonesian language education department who is currently taking the writing 1 course at the Bengkulu University, Indonesia. There are two instruments used in this analysis, the writing test HOTs test for Quantitative statistics and semi-structured qualitative data interviews. The data from the writing test and the HOTs were quantitatively analysed for the paired sample t-test, the stand-alone sample t-test and the MANOVA, while the interview data were analysed using thematic analysis techniques.

Results and Implications. The results have found that process-genre approach had a substantial positive effect on scholarly writing and student HOTs. Besides, thematic research also reveals that there are favorable views and expectations of students regarding the influence of the process-genre approach towards academic writing and student HOTs. This finding is iexpected to enrich knowledge about how students could enhance their writing ability and HOTs by using process-genre approach.

作者简介

Dian Wardhana

University of Bengkulu

Email: dec.wardhana@unib.ac.id
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8424-0153

参考

  1. Abdurahman, A., Setyaningsih, C. A., & Jalmo, T. (2019). Implementing multiple representation based worksheet to develop critical thinking skill. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 138-155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10271a
  2. Agesta, S., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2017). Effect of process-genre approach on the Indonesial efl writing achievement across personality.International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 5(3), 39-48.
  3. Agibuay, R. M. (2017). Descriptive writing using the process-genre approach. Asia Pasific Journal of Contemporary Education and Communication Technology, 3(1), 272-282.
  4. Alabere, R. A., & Shapii, A. (2019). The effects of process-genre approach on academic writing. Journal of English Educators Society, 4(2), 89-98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v4i2.2598
  5. Alrawili, K. S., Osman, K., & Almuntasheri, S. (2020). Effect of scaffolding strategies on higher-order thinking skills in science classroom. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(5), 718-729. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.718
  6. Alwaleedi, M. A. (2018). Collaborative writing in arabic as a second language (asl) classrooms: A mixed-method study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Queensland. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1521422
  7. Assagaff, H. T. (2016). A process genre approach to teaching report writing to Arab EFL computer science students.International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(6), 8-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n6p8
  8. Babalola, & Litinin, H. A. (2012). Effects of process-genre based approach on the written english performance of computer science students in a Nigerian polytechnic. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(6), 1-7.https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/1630.
  9. Badger, R.,& White, G. (2000). A process genre ppproach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153-160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153
  10. Bakla, A. (2020). A mixed-methods study of feedback modes in efl writing. Language Learning and Technology, 24(1), 107-128.https://doi.org/10.125/44712.
  11. Bin-Hady, W. R. A., Nasser, A. N. A., & Al-Kadi, A. (2020). A pre-experimental study on a process-genre approach for teaching essay writing. Journal of Language and Education, 6(4), 44-54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10347
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  13. Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD Member Book.
  14. Carlson, J. A. (2010). Avoiding traps in member checking. The Qualitative Reportualitative Report, 15(5), 1102-1113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1332
  15. Chinedu, C. C., & Kamin, Y. (2015). Strategies for improving higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning of design and technology education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 7(2), 35-43.https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/1081.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications.
  17. Creswell, J. W., Clark, P., Gutmann, V. L., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209-240). Sage.
  18. Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
  19. Du, B. (2015). Raising process-genre awareness: A proposal of esp writing lesson plan. Creative Education, 6(6), 631-639. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.66062
  20. Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using google docs on efl learners' academic writing skills: A mixed methods study.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 787-815. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056
  21. Gailea, N., Syafrizal, S., & Prabowo, E. (2021). Collaboration of online learning and high order thinking to develop writing and speaking skill. Psychology and Education, 58(2), 8680-8688. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i2.3518
  22. Ganapathy, M., Kaur, M., Singh, M., Kaur, S., & Kit, L. W. A. I. (2017). Promoting higher order thinking skills via teaching practices. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(1), 75-85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-06
  23. Gao, J. (2007). Teaching writing in Chinese universities: Find an eclectic approach. The Asian EFL Journal, 50(2).
  24. Greene, J. C., Krayder, H., & Mayer, E. (2005).Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in social inquiry. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 275-282). Sage Publishing.
  25. Guthrie, K. H. (2019). Nothing is ever easy: Parent perceptions of intensity in their gifted adolescent children. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 2080-2101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3598
  26. Helaluddin, H., Ahmad, M. A., & Anshari, A. (2020). Need analysis of academic writing teaching model based on process-genre approach: What do they really need? Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4728-4735. DOI:https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081043
  27. Heong, Y. M., Yunos, J. M., Othman, W., Hassan, R., Kiong, T. T., & Mohamad, M. M. (2012). The needs analysis of learning higher order thinking skills for generating ideas. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 197-203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.265
  28. Hoa, T. M. (2022). Impacts of process-genre approaches on EFL sophomores' writing performance, writing self-efficacy, writing autonomy. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 181-195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12165
  29. Huang, Y., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Does a process-genre approach help improve students' argumentative writing in English as a foreign language? Findings from an intervention study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 339-364. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1649223
  30. Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). Hots-aep: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 935-942. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935
  31. Indrawati, S., & Subadiyono. (2018). Process genre based approach model in learning academic writing skills.International Seminar and Annual Meeting BKS-PTN Wilayah Barat (pp. 658-662). Universitas Sriwijaya.
  32. Janenoppakarn, C., & Thongrin, S. (2020). Enhancing medical and health science students' writing development through a modified process-genre approach. The Asian EFL Journal, 24(2), 99-135.
  33. Jarunthawatchai, W. (2010). A Proces-genre approach to teaching second language writing: Theoretical perspective and implementation in a thai university setting. University of Southampton. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2016.7757408
  34. Kamalodeen, V. J., & Jameson-Charles, M. (2016). A mixed methods research approach to exploring teacher participation in an online social networking website.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, January-De, 1-14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915624578
  35. Kazazoglu, S. (2020). Is printed-text the best choice? A mixed-method case study on reading comprehension. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 458-473. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.712879
  36. King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 257-270). Sage.
  37. Kondal, B. (2020). Impact of the process genre approach on the management students' business writing skills. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 3(2), 297-307. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v3i2.9727
  38. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
  39. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorial data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  40. Lee, K., Ang, C., & Dipolog-ubanan, G. (2019). My first year in the university: Students' expectations, perceptions, and experiences. Journal of Social Science Research, 14, 3134-3145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24297/jssr.v14i0.8006
  41. Leighton, J. P. (2011). A cognitive model for the assessments of higher order thinking skills. Information Age Publisher.
  42. Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3). 193-227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00025-0
  43. Luo, M., & Dappen, L. (2005). Mix-methods design for objective-based evaluation of a magnet school assistance project. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(1), 109-118. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2003.12.001
  44. Lustyantie, N., Arung, F., & Fitriany, D. A. (2019). Re-designing the higher order thinking skills (hots) approach for academic writing students. Research, Society and Development, 8(10), 1-19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v8i10.1420
  45. Mahsun, M. (2014). Teks dalam pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia kurikulum 2013 [Text in learning Indonesian curriculum 2013]. Raja Grafindo.
  46. Maolida, E. H., & Salsabila, V. A. (2019).Integrating process-genre approach with project IBUNKA to improve students' English writing. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 91-100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2057
  47. Marshall, J. C., & Horton, R. M. (2011). The relationship of teacher-facilitated, inquiry-based instruction to student higher-order thinking. School Science and Mathematics, 111(3), 93-101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00066.x
  48. Martinez, M., & McGrath, D. (2014). Technology alone won't transform teacher to facilitator. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(1), 41-45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721714547861
  49. Morse, J. M., Barret, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1-9.https://doi.org/10.1177%2F160940690200100202.
  50. Murray, N., & Hughes, G. (2008). Writing up your universsity assigment and research project. McGraw Hills.
  51. Nordin, S. M., & Mohammad, N. (2006). The best two approaches: Process/genre based approach to teaching writing. The English Teacher, 35(1), 75-85.
  52. Nourdad, N., Masoudi, S., & Rahimali, P. (2018). The effect of higher order thinking skill instruction on efl reading ability.International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 231-237. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.231
  53. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  54. Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic english. Pearson.
  55. Panou, D. (2013). L2 writing assessment in the Greek school of foreign language. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(4), 649-654. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.4.649-654
  56. Pham, V. P. H. (2021). The effects of lecturer's model e-comments on graduate students' peer e-comments and writing revision.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 324-357. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1609521
  57. Pham, V. P. H., & Usaha, S. (2016). Blog based peer response for L2 writing revision.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 724-748. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1026355
  58. Ramadhan, S., Mardapi, D., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Utomo, H. B. (2019). The development of an instrument to measure the higher order thinking skill in physics. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 743-751. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.743
  59. Ramon-Casas, M., Nuno, N., Pons, F., & Cunillera, T. (2018). The different impact of structured peer-assessment task in relation to university undergraduates' initial writing skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 653-663. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1525337
  60. Razak, R. A., & Lee, C. M. (2012). Promoting higher order thinking in Chinese language literary text via online social network. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(16), 199-210.https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/3716/3765.
  61. Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academy Press.
  62. Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mix-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135-173. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000505
  63. Rusinovci, X. (2022) An amalgamation of the process and genre approaches to teaching writing.International Journal of Social Sciences: Current and Future Research Trends, 13(1), 73-81.
  64. Salem, A. A. M. S. (2018). Engaging esp university students in flipped classrooms for developing functional writing skills, hots, and eliminating writer's block. English Language Teaching, 11(12), 177-198. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n12p177
  65. Sarala, T., Fauziah, B. I., & Rahim, B. S. A. (2015). Role of model essays in developing students writing skills in malaysian schools: A review of literature. Mediterranian Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 56-61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2s1p56
  66. Schraw, G. M. T., McCrudden, S., Lehman, L., & Hoffman, B. (2011). An overview of thinking skills in assessment of higher order thinking skills. Information Age Publisher.
  67. Sianturi, L. P. D., Silalahi, D. E., & Purba, C. N. (2020). Improving students' writing ability based on higher order thinking skills (hots) questions at 8th grade in smp swasta kartika 1-4 pematangsiantar. Journal of English Teaching as a Foreign Language, 6(2), 1-17.
  68. Singh, C. K.S., Gopal, R., Ong, E. T., Singh, T. S. M., Mostafa, N. A., & Singh, R. K. A. (2020). ESL teachers' strategies to foster higher-order thinking skills to teach writing. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 195-226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.2.7
  69. Singh, C. K. S., Singh, R. K. A., Singh, T. S. M., Mostafa, N. A., & Mohtar, T. M. T. (2018). Developing a higher order thinking skills module for weak ESL learners. English Language Teaching, 11(7), 86-100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n7p86
  70. Singh, R. K. A., Singh, C. K. S., Mostafa, N. A., & Singh, T. S. M. (2018). A review of research on the use of higher order thinking skills to teach writing.International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(1), 86-93. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n1p86
  71. Tajudin, N. M., & Chinnappan, M. (2016). The link between higher order thinking skills, representation, and concepts in enhancing timss tasks.International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 199-214. DOI:https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9214a
  72. Tesfie, A. (2017). Teachers' cognition on process genre approach and practice of teaching writing skills in efl context. English for Spesific Purposes World, 54(19), 1-17.
  73. Tiruneh, D. T., Cock, M. De, & Elen, J. (2017). Designing learning environments for critical thinking: Examining effective instructional approaches.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 1065-1089. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9829-z
  74. Toprak, Z., Yucel, V. (2020). A peculiar practice of academic writing: Epidemic writing in the Turkish graduate education. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1-15.https://doi.org/10.10.8012331186x.2020.1774098.
  75. Wang, L. (2022). Effects of regulation on interaction pattern in web-based collaborative writing activity.Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(1-2), 1-35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1667831
  76. Winarti, W., Cahyono, B. Y., Mukminatien, N., & Khoiri, N. E. (2021). Collaborative writing using process writing approach: The effect of group size and personality types.International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 391-410. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14423a
  77. Xu, W., & Li, X. (2018). Teaching academic writing through a process-genre approach: A pedagogical exploration of an EAP program in China. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 22(2), 1-21.http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume22/ej86/ej86a1.
  78. Yan, G. (2005). A process genre model for taeching writing. English Teaching Forum, 43(3), 18-26.
  79. Yanghee, K., & Jiyoung, K. (2005). Teaching Korean university writing class: Balancing the process and genre approach. Asian EFL Journal, 7(2), 1-15.
  80. Zainurrahman, Z. (2011). Menulis: Dari teori hingga praktik [Writing: From theory to practice]. Alfabeta.
  81. Zhao, S. (2017). On the application of the process-genre approach to teaching english writing. 2017 3rd Annual International Conference on Modern Education and Social Science (pp. 495-499). DEStech Publication.
  82. Yuniar, R. F., Widiati, U., & Astuti, U. P. (2019). The effect of using Wattpad on process-genre approach towards writing achievement in tertiary level. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(7), 897-905. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i7.12631
  83. Zohar, A., & Schwartzer, N. (2005). Assessing teachers' pedagogical knowledge in the context of teaching higher-order thinking.International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1595-1620. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500186592

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载


Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可