The concept of “utility” in early utilitarianism XVII–XVIII centuries

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The relevance of the research topic is determined by the variety of interpretations of the concept of “utility”, according to which the problems of pleasure, good and happiness are solved. The English utilitarians of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were the first to conduct an in-depth analysis of “utility” and try to find common grounds that constitute this concept. The purpose of the article is to clarify the ways of using the concept of “utility” in the works of J. Berkeley, D. Hume and I. Bentham. The systematization of the views of the New Time, carried out by these thinkers, allowed us to approach the identification of the essence of “utility”. Proportionality and symmetry, the conditions of appointment and adaptation to the needs of man contributed to the removal of the beautiful and moral principles from the useful. The fact that the perfection of a thing is defined as an acceptable purpose for which it was created gave reason to conclude that the concept of “ulitity” in early utilitarianism is revealed through the rationality of goals and means, and the “principle of utility” – through the dependence of individual interests from the level of social welfare.

About the authors

Iskender A. Gaparov

Samara National Research University named after Academician S.P. Korolev

Author for correspondence.
Email: sarov-1@mail.ru

Postgraduate student of the Department of Philosophy

Russian Federation, Samara

References

  1. Aristotel’. Nikomakhova etika. In: Sochineniya v 4 t. Moscow: Mysl’; 1984. Vol. 4. P. 53–294. (In Russ.)
  2. Bentam I. Vvedenie v osnovanija nravstvennosti i zakonodatel’stva. Moscow; 1998. (In Russ.)
  3. Berkli Dzh. Alkifron, ili melkiy filosof. Raboty raznykh let: per. s angl. A.A. Vasil’eva. Saint Petersburg; 2000. P. 13–252. (In Russ.)
  4. Besedin A. George Berkeley as a Philosopher of the Enlightenment. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. 2014;(5):24–34. (In Russ.)
  5. Dzhovanni Piko della Mirandola. Rech’ o dostoinstve cheloveka: per. s lat. L.M. Braginoi. Antologiya filosofii srednikh vekov i ehpokhi Vozrozhdeniya. Moscow; 2001. P. 318–332. (In Russ.)
  6. Byhovskij BJe. Dzhodzh Berkli. Moscow: Mysl’; 1970. P. 7–196. (In Russ.)
  7. Vasil’ev VV. Djevid Jum i zagadki ego filosofii. Moscow; 2020. P. 21–122. (In Russ.)
  8. Vasil’ev VV. Unknown Hume. Voprosy filosofii. 2014;(1):127–139. (In Russ.)
  9. Gegel’ GVF. Jenciklopedija filosofskih nauk. Vol. 1. Nauka logiki. Moscow; 1974. (In Russ.)
  10. Gluhman V. David Hume’s idea of humanity. Eticheskaya mysl’. 2012;(12):245–258. (In Russ.)
  11. Dessaujer Fridrih. Spor o tehnike: monografija: per. s nem. A.Ju. Nesterova. Samara; 2017. (In Russ.)
  12. Diter F. Martin Ljuter i Tomas Mjuncer, ili Nachala buhgalterii. Moscow; 1976. (In Russ.)
  13. Kuzanskij N. O predpolozhenijah. Sochinenija: v 2 t. Moscow: Mysl’; 1979. Vol. 2. P. 258–261. (In Russ.)
  14. London Dzh. Martin Iden. Moscow; 2020. (In Russ.)
  15. Malyshkin EV. Characteristica universalis as a mnemonical project. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. 2011;2(3):27–36. (In Russ.)
  16. Mandevil’ B. Basnja o pchelah, ili Poroki chastnyh lic – blaga dlja obshhestva. Moscow: Nauka; 2000. (In Russ.)
  17. Marshje P. Spinoza, konec istorii i hitrost’ razuma. Logos. 2007;2(59):116–140. (In Russ.)
  18. Mill’ D.S. Utilitarizm. Rostov-on-Don; 2013. (In Russ.)
  19. Nesterov AJu. Semioticheskie osnovanija tehniki i tehnicheskogo soznanija: monografija. Samara; 2017. (In Russ.)
  20. Nicshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra. Moscow; 1994. P. 29–389. (In Russ.)
  21. Prokof’ev AV. Utilitarizm. Philosophical Anthropology. 2020;5(2):192–215. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21146/2414-3715-2019-5-2-192-215
  22. Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov. Moscow; 2016. P. 888–976. (In Russ.)
  23. Hatcheson F. Issledovanie o proishozhdenii nashih idej krasoty i dobrodeteli v dvuh traktatah. In: F. Hatcheson, D. Jum, A. Smit. Jestetika. Moscow; 1973. P. 41–262. (In Russ.)
  24. Sheftsberi. Moralisty. Filosofskaja rapsodija. In: Sheftsberi. Jesteticheskie opyty. Per. A.V. Mikhaivov. Moscow; 1975. P. 77–236. (In Russ.)
  25. Jum D. Issledovanie o principah morali. In: Sochinenija v 2 t. Moscow; 1996. Vol. 2. P. 171–379. (In Russ.)
  26. The Works of Jeremy Bentham in 11 Vol. Ed. by J. Bowring. Edinburgh; 1843. Vol. 3. P. 231–295.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Gaparov I.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).