The influence of facial stigma and physical attractiveness on the impressions formation about person
- Authors: Zorina S.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Samara National Research University
- Issue: Vol 19, No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 93-106
- Section: Social psychology
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1991-8569/article/view/71719
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2022.1.7
- ID: 71719
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
When a person is perceived, the impression of a person is formed as a result of processing a multitude of signs (features of the face). A significant part of these signals has been studied in sufficient detail, but information on how they interact with each other is not enough. The study is aimed at studying the mechanism of impression formation as a result of the perception of two signals having the opposite effect: physical attractiveness and stigma of disembryogenesis (orbital hypertelorism, manifested in increasing the distance between the inner corners of the eyes). Physical attractiveness enhances a positive impression, while facial stigma contributes to a negative opinion of the person. We expected that the impression will depend on the interaction of the signals with each other. In the experiment, participants (200 people) made judgments about three groups of variables: personality traits, the degree of desired interpersonal proximity, the reliability of a person (danger and potential criminality). To identify the interaction of signals, the division of the photoimage into two parts was used. This technique makes it difficult for the holistic perception of the face, weakening the influence of facial signals. Meaning, changes in the eye area have less impact on the overall impression because the upper and lower halves of the face are perceived separately. The hypothesis was confirmed for social judgments about the reliability of a person. For physically attractive individuals, the violation of continuty contributed to an increase in the attributed likelihood of committing murder and fraud, for physically unattractive — a decrease in the perceived danger and the possibility degree of committing fraudulent activities. While perceiving the face of another person, the subject of perception forms a holistic impression in which the initial pieces of information are integrated depending on their weight, for example, a strong signal eliminates a weak one. Obtained results shows that physical attractiveness weakens the influence of dysembryogenesis stigma on the evaluation of potential criminality, forming a positive bias.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Svetlana V. Zorina
Samara National Research University
Author for correspondence.
Email: Aramitch@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2445-2864
SPIN-code: 6637-1501
Cand. Phy. Sci., Associate Professor, Head of Social Phycology Department
Russian Federation, SamaraReferences
- Asch S.E. Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1946. No. 41 (3). Рр. 258–290.
- Brewer M.B. A Dual Process Model of Impression Formation. T.K. Srull, R.S. Wyer (Eds.). Advances in social cognition. New York: Psychology Press, 2014. Vol. I. Рр. 2–36.
- Demidov A.A. Otsenka individual’no-psihologicheskih osobennostej cheloveka po vyrazheniyu ego litsa v razlichnyh situatsiyah vospriyatiya: Аvtoref. dis. kand. ps. nauk [Evaluation of individual psychological characteristics of a person by expressing his face in various styles of perception. Abstract of thesis cand. of ps. sci.]. Moscow, 2009. 26 р.
- Artemceva N.G., Il’yasov I.I. Osobennosti vospriyatiya psihologicheskih harakteristik cheloveka po ego litsu: differentsial’nyj podhod [Features of perception of psychological characteristics of person by his face: differential approach]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 14. Psihologiya. 2009. No. 3. Рр. 54–65.
- Sergienko E.A., Nikitina E.A. Mekhanizmy vospriyatiya pola cheloveka po izobrazheniyam lits novorozhdennyh [Mechanisms of sex perception on newborn faces’ images]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2004. Vol. 25. No. 4. Рр. 5–13.
- Nikitina E.A. Vospriyatie zdorov’ya po izobrazheniyam lits [Health illness perception by faces in art]. Litso cheloveka v nauke, iskusstve i praktike. Moscow: Kogito-Centr Publ., 2014. Рр. 253–268.
- Zorina S.V., Shpuntova V.V., Kamzina O.A. Formirovanie vpechatleniya kak tselostnyj i poelementnyj protsess (na primere otsenki feminnosti) [Formation of impression as a holistic and element-wise process (on the example of assessing femininity)]. Lico cheloveka v nauke, iskusstve i praktike. Moscow: Kogito-Centr Publ., 2014. Рр. 69–92.
- Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A.J., Larson A., Hallam M., Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin. 2000. No. 126 (3). Рр. 390–423.
- Suemi V., Fernhem A. Psihologiya krasoty i privlekatel’nosti [Psychology of beauty and attractiveness]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2009. 240 р.
- Labunskaya V.A. Teoretiko-empiricheskie podhody k issledovaniyu otnosheniya k etnolukizmu [Theoretical and empirical approaches to the study of attitude to the discrimination of the ethno lookism]. Social’naya psihologiya i obshchestvo. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 4. Рр. 19–33.
- Glotova G.A., Nabojchenko E.S. Formiruyushchee prostranstvo lichnosti c atipichnymi osobennostyami vneshnosti [Forming space of personality with atypical features of appearance]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 1. Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul’tury. 2009. No. 1/2 (62). Рр. 202–207.
- Nabojchenko E.S. Vnutrennie i vneshnie determinanty, vliyayushchie na stigmatizatsiyu lichnosti s atipichnymi osobennostyami vneshnosti [Inner and outer determinants affecting stigmatisation of personality with atypical features of appearance]. Zdorov’e i obrazovanie v XXI veke. 2015. Vol. 17. No. 1. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vnutrennie-i-vneshnie-determinanty-vliyayuschie-na-stigmatizatsiyu-lichnosti-s-atipichnymi-osobennostyami-vneshnosti (accessed April 16, 2021).
- Pogontseva D.V. Vidy diskriminatsii po vneshnemu obliku [Types of discrimination in appearance]. Psihologiya i psihotekhnika. 2013. No. 9. Рр. 858–861. https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=-25838 (accessed April 16, 2021).
- Zorina S.V., Shalaeva N.Yu. Fizicheskie harakteristiki litsa cheloveka kak faktor sotsial’noj perceptsii [Physical characteristics of the human face as a factor of social perception]. Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnaya seriya. 2011. No. 5 (106). Рр. 184–187.
- Zorina S.V., Kamzina O.A. Formirovanie vpechatleniya o cheloveke kak rezul’tat tselostnoj i poelementnoj obrabotki litsevyh signalov [Impression formation about a person as a result of holistic and element-wise processing of facial signals]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. No. 3 (71). Рр. 117–124.
- Barabanshchikov V.A. Vospriyatie lichnostnyh osobennostej cheloveka po vyrazheniyu ego litsa [The reflection of the personality in the mirror of the face]. Sotsial’nyj i emotsional’nyj intellekt: Ot protsessov k izmereniyam / Pod red. D.V. Lyusina, D.V. Ushakova. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN Publ., 2009. Рр. 40–59.
- Lupenko E.A. Specifika mezhlichnostnogo vospriyatiya v usloviyah pred’yavleniya tselogo i «razdelennogo litsa» na primere portretnyh izobrazhenij [The specificity of interpersonal perception in terms of presentation of the image of a whole face and a «split face» on the example of perception of pictorial portraits]. Experimental Psychology. 2015. Vol. 8. No. 4. Рр. 120–133.
- Vrozhdennye anomalii kostej cherepa i litsa, vrozhdennye kostno-myshechnye deformatsii golovy i litsa. Klinicheskie rekomendatsii [Congenital anomalies of the bones of the skull and face, congenital musculoskeletal deformities of the head and face. Clinical guidelines]. Moscow, 2021. https:// svbgp.ru/data/documents/vrozhd-def-kotey-cherepa.pdf (accessed September 9, 2021).
- Osin E.N., Rasskazova E.I., Neyaskina Yu., Dorfman L.Ya., Aleksandrova L.A. Operatsionalizatsiya pyatifaktornoj modeli lichnostnyh chert na rossijskoj vyborke [Operationalization of five factor model of personality lines in the Russian selection]. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika. 2015. No. 3. Рр. 80–104.
- Shmelev A.G. Psihodiagnostika lichnostnyh chert [Psychodiagnostics of personality traits]. St. Petersburg: Rech’ Publ., 2002. 480 р.
- Labunskaya V.A., Kapitanova E.V. Samootsenka i ocenka vneshnego oblika chlenov studencheskoj gruppy kak prediktory otnoshenij mezhlichnostnoj znachimosti [Self-Assessment and Appearance Evaluation in Student Group as Predictors in Relationships of Interpersonal Significance]. Sotsial’naya psihologiya i obshchestvo. 2016. Vol. 7. No. 1. Рр. 72–87.
- Shalaeva N.Yu., Gudzovskaya A.A. Tipy sotsial’nyh ustanovok v otnoshenii privlekatel’nosti/neprivlekatel’nosti drugogo cheloveka [Types of social attitudes towards other person attractiveness/unattractiveness]. Vestnik Samarskogo munitsipal’nogo instituta upravleniya. 2013. No. 3. Рр. 133–141.
- Bakshutova E.V. Gruppovoe soznanie rossijskoj intelligentsii [The group consciousness of the Russian intelligentsia]. Samara, 2005. 502 р.
- Hosoda M., Stone-Romero E.F., Coats G. The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel psychology. 2003. No. 56 (2). Рр. 431–462.
- Perry S.J. A study of physical appearance and level of attraction to the opposite sex. Modern Psychological Studies. 1998. No. 6 (2). Рр. 12–17.
- Mulford M., Orbell J., Shatto C., Stockard J. Physical attractiveness, opportunity, and success in everyday exchange. American journal of sociology. 1998. No. 103 (6). Рр. 1565–1592.
- Zebrowitz L.A., Montepare J.M. Appearance does matter. Science. 2005. No. 308 (5728). Рр. 1565–1566.
- Oosterhof N.N., Todorov A. The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008. Рр. 105 (32). Рр. 11087–11092.
- Sutherland C.A., Oldmeadow J.A., Santos I.M., Towler J., Burt D.M., Young A.W. Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model. Cognition. 2013. No. 127 (1). Рр. 105–118.
- Fiske S.T. Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980. No. 38. Рр. 889–906.
- Skowronski J.J., Carlston D.E. Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin. 1989. No. 105. Рр. 131–142.
- Peeters G., Czapinski J. Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. W. Stroebe, M. Hewstone (Eds.). European review of social psychology. 1990. No. 1. Pp. 33–60. Chichester, England: Wiley
- Rozin P., Royzman E.B. Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion. Personality and Social Psychology. 2001. No. 5 (4). Рр. 296–320.
Supplementary files
