DEVIANT BEHAVIOR OF STUDENTS IN THE SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In the article a phenomenon of lying in the context of deviant behavior in social and psycho-logical adaptation in higher education is considered. A complex approach to the analysis of the causes of deviations in the behavior of students is used. The motives of lying in accordance with the accentuation of character students are investigated. Explore areas such as the impact of neurosis on I-conceptual structures of personality: lie as a self-deception both in the form of an inadequate indicator of self-bias, distort the perception of their own social significance and lies as a means to manipulate the behavior of participants in social interaction. The results of the statistical analysis of indicators such as motivational orientation lies, according to the accentuation of character are listed. The dynamics of changes in the motives of lying according to age students is showed. The causation of complex influence neurotic character changes and accentuation of personality of students and their deviant behavior in the process of social and psychological adaptation in high school is displayed. The specific character of modern conditions of education in the context of the impact on the psycho-emotional sphere of students is analyzed. The causality of the effects of information load of a destructive nature to the general state of mental stability of students and their emo-tional burnout are detected. The burnout syndrome in the context of detection of symptoms is described. The highlights the impact of the effect of burnout students on the general mood of the social group is underlined too. The mechanism of inclusion of mental defense mechanisms with the aim of social and psychological adaptation of the person to restore the psychological comfort in the university is showed. The results of the author's use of techniques to determine the motive of lying in the social in-teraction of students is presented. These studies show the relationship of lying students to lie: the opinions of the possibility of forgiveness of yourself and others against the lies are pre-sented. It is proposed to define a lie as a deviant strategy of social and psychological adapta-tion of students in high school.

About the authors

Elena Yu. Dvoinikova

Samara State Technical University

Email: dey10@rambler.ru

References

  1. Апинян Г.В. Девиантное поведение как социокультурный феномен: Дисс. … канд. филос. наук / Г.В. Апинян. - СПб., 2009. - 230 с.
  2. Двойникова Е.Ю. Ложь как психологический феномен в психосоциальной адаптации в вузе // Психологическая безопасность, устойчивость, психотравма: Сборник научных статей по материалам I Международного форума / Под общ. ред. И.А. Баевой, Ш. Ионеску, Л.А. Регуш / Пер. Н.Л. Регуш, С.А. Чернышевой. - СПб.: Книжный дом, 2006. - 304 с. - С. 217-218.
  3. Двойникова Е.Ю. Девиация поведения в процессе социально-психологической адаптации в условиях этнической депривации // Вестник Самарского государственного технического университета. Сер. Психолого-педагогические науки. - 2014. - № 1 (21). - С. 67-74.
  4. Двойникова Е.Ю. Развитие лидерского потенциала в профессиональной деятельности у студентов на основе коррекции типа социально-психологической адаптации // Вестник Самарского государственного технического университета. Сер. Психолого-педагогические науки. - 2015. - № 1 (25). - С. 63-70.
  5. Знаков В.В. Западные и русские традиции в понимании лжи: размышления российского психолога над исследованиями Пола Экмана / В.В. Знаков. Послесловие к книге Экман П. Психология лжи. - СПб.: Питер, 2009. - 272 с.
  6. Майсак Н.В. Матрица социальных девиаций: классификация типов и видов девиантного поведения // Современные проблемы науки и образования. - 2010. - № 4. - С. 78-86
  7. Медведева Е.С. Сущность и существование девиантного поведения. - Красноярск: ГОУ ВШ, 2007.
  8. Орлова Т.Г. Социально-педагогический процесс в системе регулирования девиантного поведения // Мир науки, культуры, образования. - 2010. - № 1 (20). - С. 250-253.
  9. Тарасов А.Н. Психология лжи. - М.: Книжный мир, 2005. - 327 с.
  10. Экман П. Психология лжи. - СПб.: Питер, 2009. - 272 с.
  11. Curra J. The relativity of deviance. - SAGE Publications. Inc., 2000.
  12. Ekman P. Deception, lying and demeanor // States of mind: American and Post-Soviet Per-spectives on Contemporary Issues in Psychology. N.Y., Oxford. - 1997. - P. 93-105.
  13. Sumner C. The sociology of deviance: an obituary. - Itasca (IV). F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc., 1995.
  14. Vrij A., Graham S. Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies / Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour Science and Law. - 1997. - N 5. - P. 144-148.

Copyright (c) 2015 Dvoinikova E.Y.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies