Student autonomy in the classroom: balancing permission and authority in Algerian and Russian classrooms
- Authors: Laiche S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
- Issue: Vol 22, No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 83-94
- Section: Higher school education
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1991-8569/article/view/353595
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2025.3.6
- ID: 353595
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Student autonomy is essential in modern education, promoting engagement, motivation, and critical life skills. This study examines the communication styles of Algerian and Russian students, focusing on their indirectness when requesting permission from teachers. Using a comparative case study design and qualitative methods, 143 students (72 Russian and 71 Algerian) completed discourse completion tests in their native languages, reflecting real-life classroom interactions. Findings reveal that both groups tend to use indirect strategies due to cultural values emphasizing hierarchy, respect, and formality. However, while indirectness is common, Algerian students occasionally employ more direct forms like declaratives, reflecting a shift toward autonomy and independence. Differences in rhetorical strategies highlight how societal and educational norms shape student-teacher communication. The study underscores the importance of cultural awareness in diverse educational settings, suggesting that understanding these communication patterns can enhance teacher-student relationships and create more inclusive, respectful classroom environments that support effective learning and student agency.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Souhila Laiche
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: laiche.souhilaa@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8895-1940
Post-graduate student at the Department of Foreign Languages
Russian Federation, 6, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow, 117198References
- Little D. Learner autonomy 2: Challenges to research and practice. Authentik, 2007.
- Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media, 1985.
- Vygotsky L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, 1978.
- Mouloud T. Traditional teaching methods and student autonomy in Algeria: A case study. Journal of Education and Practice. 2010. No. 1(1). Рр. 12–24.
- Hamdani A. Fostering autonomous learners in the Algerian EFL classroom: Challenges and perspectives. Arab World English Journal. 2015. No. 6(3). Рр. 18–35.
- Harris R. The Role of Politeness and Authority in Teacher-Student Interactions in Arab World Classrooms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2014. No. 45(6). Рр. 1019–1037.
- Brown P., Levinson S.C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
- Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage, 1980.
- Bourdieu P. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Sage, 1977.
- Kasyanova E.V. The impact of cultural factors on Russian education: Implications for teacher-student interactions and classroom practices. Russian Education and Society. 2009. No. 51(5). Рр. 25–42.
- Ponomareva I. Autonomy in Russian language education: A shift towards student-centered learning. Russian Linguistics Journal. 2013. No. 29(3). Рр. 13–27.
Supplementary files

