Email this article Narrative structure of the pedagogical situation
- Authors: Dobrova V.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Samara State Technical University
- Issue: Vol 21, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 65-74
- Section: Theory of pedagogy
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/1991-8569/article/view/260675
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2024.2.5
- ID: 260675
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The paper proposes a method of formalizing the narrative structure of a pedagogical situation on the basis of frames. The frame method allows effectively representing any cultural objects and scenarios using a common system of methodological categories. Depending on the previously proposed understanding of a pedagogical situation, all situations were classified into 3 groups. For each group of situations a formalized frame-scenario description as well as interpretation was proposed. The frames of the 3 distinguished groups partially coincide, although they have different structures. Frames allow modeling and systematizing the structure and content of pedagogical situations. In addition to describing classes of situations, they are a convenient tool for formalizing the meta-language for describing pedagogical phenomena.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Victoria V. Dobrova
Samara State Technical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: victoria_dob@mail.ru
Cand. Psych. Sci., Associate Professor, Head of Foreign Languages Department
Russian Federation, 244, Molodogvardeyskaya st., Samara, 443100References
- Bocharov V.A., Markin V.I. Osnovy logiki [Basocs of logics]. Moscow: Forum, Infa-M Publ., 2015. 336 p.
- Savitskiy V.M. Angliyskaya frazeologiya: problemy modelirovaniya [English phraseology: modeling problems]. Samara: Samarskiy universitet Publ., 1993. 172 p.
- Ivin A.A. Logika [Logics]. Moscow: FAIR-PRESS Publ., 2002. 122 p.
- Ishmuratov A.T. Logicheskiy analiz prakticheskih rassuzhdeniy [Logical analysis of practical thinking]. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka Publ., 1987. 140 p.
- Abelson R., Schank R. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: an Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. N.Y.: Hillsdale Publishers, 1977. 248 p.
- Fillmore Ch. Frame Semantics. Linguistics in the Morning Calm. The Linguistic Society of Korea. Seoul: Hanshin, 1982. Pр. 111–137.
- Andor J. On the Psychological Relevance of Frames. Quaderni di semantica. 1985. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pр. 212–221.
- Petrenko V.F. Vvedeniye v eksperimental’nuyu psikhosemantiku: issledovaniye form reprezentatsii v obydennom soznanii [Introduction to experimental psychosemantics: the study of forms of representation in everyday consciousness]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1983. 176 р.
- Bruner Dzh. Psikhologiya poznaniya [Psychology of cognition]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1977. 412 р.
- Katz J., Fodor J. The Structure of a Semantic Theory. The Structure of Language. New Jersey: Indianapolis, 1967. Pр. 268–288.
- Michon J. Multidimensional and hierarchical analysis of progress in learning. Cognition in learning and memory. N.Y.: Academic Press, 1972.
- Nyberg L. Levels of processing: a view from functional brain imaging. Levels of processing 30 years on. Hove, N.Y.: Psychology press, 2002.
- Larichev O.I. Ob”yektivnyye modeli i sub”yektivnyye resheniya [Objective models and subjective decisions]. Moscow, 1987. 142 р.
- Logvinov I.I. Imitacionnoye modelirovaniye v psihologo-pedagogicheskih issledovaniyah [Imitation modeling in psychological and peadodical research]. Voprosy psihologii. 1980. No. 6. Pр. 60–73.
- Sofronova N.V., Gorokhova R.I. Modelirovaniye pedagogicheskikh sistem: Monografiya [Modelling of pedagogical systems]. Cheboksary: Chuvashskiy gos. ped. un-t, 2011. 174 p.
- Titov A.V. Formalizovannoye opisaniye kompleksnoy modeli otsenki zadach upravleniya kachestvom: na primere kvalimetrii vysshey shkoly: dis. kand. tekhn. nauk [Formalized description of complex model of quality management evaluation tasks: using the example of higher school qualimetry. Thesis… cand. of tech. sci.]. Moscow, 1998. 184 p.
- Kukharenko E.V., Shaporeva A.V., Grigorenko O.V. Metodologiya formalizatsii biznes-protsessov otsenki kachestva organizatsii obucheniya s primeneniyem distantsionnykh obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologiy [Methodology of formalizing business processes of evaluation of organizational quality of distant education]. Aktual’nyye voprosy obrazovaniya. 2019. Vol. 3. Pр. 21–25.
- Sorokovykh G.V., Staritsyna S.G., Abdulmyanova I.R. Modeling the environment for the virtual teacher – student – parent interaction. Nizhny Novgorod Linguistics University Bulletin. 2022. No. 59. Pр. 128–141. doi: 10.47388/2072-3490/lunn2022-59-3-128-141.
- Novruzova G.S. Sistemnyy podkhod, modelirovaniye i imitatsionnoye modelirovaniye kak osnova obrazovatel’nykh tekhnologiy [System approach, modeling and imitation modeling as basis for educational technologies]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’. 2020. Vol. 12. No. 3. Pр. 120–131. doi: 10.17748/2075-9908-2020-12-3-120-131.
- Ossokina D.O., Smith O. On the experience of English e-learning terminology frame modeling. Humanity Space. 2021. Vol. 10. No. 7. Pр. 939–949. doi: 10.24412/2226-0773-10-7-939-949.
- Minskiy M. Freymy dlya predstavleniya znaniy [Frames for knowledge representation]. Moscow: Energiya Publ., 1979. 152 p.
- Baranov A.N., Parshin P.B. Procedurnyi yazyk v lingvisticheskoy semantike [Procedure language in linguistic semantics]. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya lit-ry i yazyka. 1990. No. 1. Pр. 16–29.
- Maslova V.A. Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. Minsk: TetraSistems Publ., 2005. 256 p.
- Dobrova V.V. Rol’ kontsepta «pedagogicheskaya situatsiya» v terminologicheskom stroye nauk ob obrazovanii: mezhdistsiplinarnyy analiz [Place of “pedagogical situation” concept in the educational terminology: cross-disciplinary analysis]. Vestnik Armavirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2023. No. 1. Pр. 39–50.
- Dobrova V.V. On one type of pedagogical situations: classification and practical aspects. Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Series: Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences. 2023. Vol. 20. No. 1. Pр. 77–86. doi: 10.17673/vsgtu-pps.2023.1.6.
