ADAPTIVE COMPARISON OF THE CONCEPT OF GOVERNANCE IN RUSSIAN AND PERSIAN LANGUAGES

Introduction. By the method of comparative research, the concepts of governance in the Russian and Persian languages are considered and compared. At the same time, an emphasis is placed on the common Indo-European root of these two languages.The purpose of this study is a better understanding of governance in the Russian language and the identification of the presence of governance in the Persian language, which, in addition to its definition in Persian, tries to consider its aspects based on the Russian language, such as strong and weak, direct and indirect, and functions that perform dependent words.The materials of this article are grammar guides in both languages and specialized books on the topic of governance, especially in Russian.Consideration of governance in Russian. Governance in the Russian language undoubtedly exists, only there are some moments in its full-fledged existence as its delimitation with adjoining, which in this work explains their difference. Consideration of the presence or absence of governance in Persian. The presence of governance in the Persian language is controversial, but this work proves that it exists, but in comparison with the Russian language, it is expressed differently. Comparison of governance in Russian and Persian. Governance in the Russian language is more elaborate, therefore it is used as a template and on its basis the governance in the Persian language is considered.Conclusion. In conclusion, the main results of research are drawn about the comparison of governance in both given languages, in connection with which facts are revealed such as the usage of the postposition – را in many cases is similar to the governance masculine gender accusative case, as well as the presence of strong and weak, direct and indirect governance. The results of this study can be effective in teaching Russian or Persian.

consideration, governance, language, Russian, Persian, grammar, presence, absence