Russia in the global array of scientific publications
- Autores: Mokhnacheva Y.V.1
-
Afiliações:
- Library for Natural Sciences RAS
- Edição: Volume 95, Nº 1 (2025)
- Páginas: 48-62
- Seção: ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0869-5873/article/view/290809
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869587325010052
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ANCSLQ
- ID: 290809
Citar
Resumo
Selecting the most relevant platform for monitoring the Russian publication array against the global background, including the analysis of publication flows in various scientific categories, is a pressing task. The objects of the study were the Russian and global publication arrays in the OpenAlex and The Lens databases in comparison with the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) for the period 2014–2023, with a special emphasis on the period 2019–2023. It was found that OpenAlex has a number of advantages over The Lens, since Russian publications are significantly underrepresented in The Lens. A comparative analysis of the dynamics of the shares of Russian publications by subject categories in OpenAlex and The Lens against the background of WoS CC showed that during 2019–2023, the gap between the shares of Russian publications in the global array in these resources relative to WoS CC for most intersecting subject categories narrowed. The data on the share distribution of Russian publications in 2021–2023 in OpenAlex correlate with the indicators in WoS CC, which gives hope for high relevance of search results using OpenAlex.
Texto integral

Sobre autores
Yu. Mokhnacheva
Library for Natural Sciences RAS
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: mohnacheva@benran.ru
кандидат педагогических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник БЕН РАН
Rússia, MoscowBibliografia
- Pranckutė R. Web of science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world // Publications. 2021, vol. 9, no. 1, art. 12. doi: 10.3390/publications9010012
- Waltman L., van Eck N., Visser M. Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic // Quantitative Science Studies. Advance Publication. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112
- Vera-Baceta M.-A., Thelwall M., Kousha K. Web of Science and Scopus language coverage // Scientometrics. 2019, vol. 121, pp. 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z
- Mongeon P., Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis // Scientometrics. 2016, vol. 106, pp. 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
- Мохначева Ю.В., Цветкова В.А. Возможные пути получения научной информации в новых условиях // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2023. Т. 5. № 3. С. 117–158. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.3.9 Mokhnacheva Yu.V., Tsvetkova V.A. Possible Ways to Search for Scientific Information in New Realities // Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2023, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 117–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.3.9 (In Russ.)
- Гуреев В.Н., Мазов Н.А. Возрастание роли открытых библиографических данных в условиях ограничения доступа к коммерческим информационным системам // Управление наукой: теория и практика. 2023. Т. 5. № 2. С. 49–76. doi: 10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.4 Gureev V.N., Mazov N.A. Increased Role of Open Bibliographic Data in the Context of Restricted Access to Proprietary Information Systems // Science Management: Theory and Practice. 2023, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 49–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.2.4 (In Russ.)
- В странах БРИКС намерены создать единую наукометрическую базу данных. https://nauka.tass.ru/nauka/21976405 The BRICS countries intend to create a single scientometric database. https://nauka.tass.ru/nauka/21976405
- Delgado‐Quirós L., Aguillo I.F., Martín‐Martín A. et al. Why are these publications missing? Uncovering the reasons behind the exclusion of documents in free‐access scholarly databases // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2024, vol. 75, pp. 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24839
- Мохначева Ю.В. Типы документов, индексируемых в базах данных WoS и Scopus: сходства, различия и их значение при анализе публикационной активности // Научно-техническая информация. Серия 1: Организация и методика информационной работы. 2023. № 1. С. 38–43. doi: 10.36535/0548-0019-2023-01-4 Mokhnacheva Yu.V. Document Types Indexed in WoS and Scopus: Similarities, Differences, and Their Significance in the Analysis of Publication Activity // Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 2023, vol. 50, pp. 40–46. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688223010033 (In Russ.)
- Donner P. Document type assignment accuracy in the journal citation index data of Web of Science // Scientometrics. 2017, vol. 113, pp. 219–236. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2483-y
- Blümel C., Schniedermann A. Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda // Scientometrics. 2020, vol. 124, pp. 711–728. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03431-7
- Gerasimov I., K.B., Mehrabian A., Acker J., Mcguire M.P. Comparison of datasets citation coverage in Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Crossref, and DataCite // Scientometrics. 2024, vol. 129, pp. 3681–3704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05073-5
- Мальцева Д.В., Павлова И.А., Капустина Л.В. Сравнительный анализ возможностей WoS и eLibrary для анализа библиографических сетей // Cоциология: 4М. 2023. № 56. С. 7–68. https://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2023.32.1.1
- Maltseva D., Pavlova I., Kapustina L. Comparative analysis of the capabilities of WoS and eLibrary for analyzing bibliographic networks // Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M). 2023, no. 56, pp. 7–68. https://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2023.32.1.1 (In Russ.)
- Мазов Н.А., Гуреев В.Н. Ведение базы данных публикаций организации с использованием библиографических ресурсов открытого доступа // Научно-техническая информация. Серия 1: Организация и методика информационной работы. 2023. № 9. C. 20–32. doi: 10.36535/0548-0019-2023-09-4 Mazov N.A., Gureyev V.N. Open Access Bibliographic Resources for Maintaining a Bibliographic Database of Research Organization // Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2023, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 211–223. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0147688223030115 (In Russ.)
- Гуреев В.Н., Ильичёва И.Ю., Мазов Н.А. Профили авторов и организаций в информационных системах Dimensions и Lens: исследование возможностей // Научные и технические библиотеки. 2023. № 10. С. 138–170. https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-10-138-170 Gureyev V.N., Ilicheva I.Yu., Mazov N.A. Author and organization profiles in Dimensions and Lens information systems: The study of functionality // Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2023, no. 10, pp. 138–170. https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-10-138-170 (In Russ.)
- Tay A., Martín-Martín A., Hug S.E. Goodbye, Microsoft Academic – hello, open research infrastructure? // Impact of Social Sciences Blog. 27 May 2021. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/111325
- Next Steps for Microsoft Academic – Expanding into New Horizons // Microsoft Academic Blog. May 4, 2021. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/articles/microsoft-academic-to-expand-horizons-with-community-driven-approach
- Chawla D.S. Microsoft Academic Graph is being discontinued. What’s next? // Nature. 2021, 15 June 2021.
- Aria M., Le T., Cuccurullo C. et al. openalexR: An R-Tool for Collecting Bibliometric Data from OpenAlex // The R Journal. 2024, vol. 15, pp. 167–180. https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2023-089
- Priem J., Piwowar Y., Orr R. OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts // STI Conference 2022, Granada. arXiv:2205.01833. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.01833
- Chawla D.S. Massive open index of scholarly papers launches. OpenAlex catalogues hundreds of millions of scientific documents and charts connections between them // Nature. 2022. 24 January. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-00138-y
- OpenAlex. Техническая документация. https://docs.openalex.org/api-entities/works
- Brooks J. Leiden rankings to add open-source version in 2024: Research Professional News. https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-europe-universities-2023-9-leiden-rankings-to-add-open-source-version-in-2024/
- CWTS Leiden Ranking Open Edition.https://open.leidenranking.com/
- Penfold R. Using the Lens database for staff publications // Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2020, vol. 108. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.918
- Jefferson O.A., Koellhofer D., Warren B., Jefferson R. The Lens MetaRecord and LensID: An open identifier system for aggregated metadata and versioning of knowledge artefacts. 2019, November 25. https://doi.org/10.31229/osf.io/t56yh
- The Lens: статья из Википедии. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lens
- OpenAlex: End-to-End Process for Topic Classification. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bDopkhuGieQ4F8gGNj7sEc8WSE8mvLZS/edit#heading=h.5w2tb5fcg77r
Arquivos suplementares
