Scientific Traditions as a Mechanism of Continuity of Psychological Cognition. Part 2. Problems, Approaches and Prospects for Research
- Authors: Oleinik Y.N.1, Zhuravlev A.L.2
-
Affiliations:
- Autonomous Nonprofit Organization of Higher Education “Moscow University for the Humanities”
- Federal State-Financed Establishment of Science, Institute of Psychology RAS
- Issue: Vol 45, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 5-15
- Section: Theoretical and metodological problems in psychology
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0205-9592/article/view/266118
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205959224040013
- ID: 266118
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The authors’ main attention is focused on current problems of studying continuity and scientific traditions in psychology. Special attention is paid to the characteristics of promising directions for studying the traditions of domestic psychological science: taking into account when studying the traditions of scientific developments on the generation of knowledge, primarily tacit; analysis of the role of individual personal variables, including ideological guidelines, cognitive attitudes, life values, features of the professional development of the researcher himself in the process of selection of knowledge acquiring the status of tradition; study of traditions as the foundations and distinctive features of scientific schools in psychology. A model for studying scientific traditions in psychology is proposed, based on ideas about three aspects of the existence of science (knowledge, social institution, cognitive activity) and different views on the understanding of the term “tradition” (according to E. Shatsky) — functional, objective and subjective. It is concluded that the preservation and development of scientific traditions is the responsibility of not only the scientific community as a whole, but also personally of each researcher involved in scientific creativity in the field of psychology.
Full Text
About the authors
Yu. N. Oleinik
Autonomous Nonprofit Organization of Higher Education “Moscow University for the Humanities”
Author for correspondence.
Email: yurii03@mail.ru
PhD (Psychology), Head of the Department of General, Social Psychology and the History of Psychology
Russian Federation, 111395, Moscow, Yunosti str., 5A. L. Zhuravlev
Federal State-Financed Establishment of Science, Institute of Psychology RAS
Email: alzhuravlev2018@yandex.ru
Member of RAS, Scientific Adviser of Institute of Psychology RAS
Russian Federation, 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, bldg. 1References
- Vernadskij V.I. Trudy po vseobshchej istorii nauki. 2-e izd. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 336 p. (In Russian)
- Vernadskij V.I. Trudy po istorii nauki v Rossii. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 464 p. (In Russian)
- Gusel’ceva M.S. Nacional’nye intellektual’nye tradicii v evolyucii psihologicheskogo znaniya. Voprosy psihologii. 2013. № 5. P. 3–13. (In Russian)
- Zhdan A.N., Marcinkovskaya T.D. Moskovskaya psihologicheskaya shkola: tradicii i sovremennost’. Voprosy psihologii. 2000. № 3. P. 117–127. (In Russian)
- Zhdan A.N. Psihologiya v Moskovskom universitete: tradicii i sovremennost’. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psihologiya. 2005. № 1. P. 3–16. (In Russian)
- Zhdan A.N. Nacional’noe nachalo v razvitii nauki: issledovatel’skie tradicii otechestvennoj psihologii v sopostavlenii s vsemirnoj nauchnoj mysl’yu. Istoriya otechestvennoj i mirovoj psihologicheskoj mysli: cenit’ proshloe, lyubit’ nastoyashchee, verit’ v budushchee. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Kol’cova, Yu.N. Olejnik. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2010. P. 32–36. (In Russian)
- Zhdan A.N. Stanovlenie tradicij otechestvennoj psihologii: Peterburgskie (Leningradskie) i Moskovskie nauchnye shkoly. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 12: Psihologiya. Sociologiya. Pedagogika. 2015. № 1. P. 74–80. (In Russian)
- Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Vmesto vvedeniya. Sovremennye ponyatiya v psihologicheskoj nauke: popytka analiza. Razrabotka ponyatij sovremennoj psihologii. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 5–59. (In Russian)
- Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A., Vilenskaya G.A. Vvodnaya glava. sovremennye podhody v otechestvennoj psihologii: edinstvo v raznoobrazii. Nauchnye podhody v sovremennoj otechestvennoj psihologii. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2023. P. 7–96. (In Russian)
- Nosulenko V.N., Terekhin V.A. Peredacha znanij: obzor osnovnyh modelej i tekhnologij. Eksperimental’naya psihologiya. 2017. V. 10. № 4. P. 96–115. (In Russian)
- Olejnik Yu.N. Istoriya psihologii kak istoriya nauchnyh problem: problemologicheskij podhod. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Chelovek i mir. 2018. V. 2. № 1. P. 20–40. (In Russian)
- Olejnik Yu.N. Problemologicheskij podhod kak variant teoretiko-metodologicheskih osnovanij istoriko-psihologicheskih issledovanij. Dokladi ot godishna universitetska nauchna konferenciya, Bolgariya, Veliko T”rnovo, 30 iyunya — 1 iyulya 2022 goda. Bolgariya, Veliko T”rnovo: Izdatelski kompleks na NVU “Vasil Levski”, 2022. P. 2211–2219. (In Russian)
- Olejnik Yu.N. K voprosu o edinice analiza znaniya i processa poznaniya v istoriko-psihologicheskih issledovaniyah. Istoriya, sovremennost’ i perspektivy razvitiya psihologii v sisteme Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Eds. D.V. Ushakov, A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Mahnach, N.E. Harlamenkova, A.V. Yurevich, I.I. Vetrova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2022. P. 152–153. (In Russian)
- Olejnik Yu.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Istoriya otechestvennoj psihologii: kommunikativno-organizacionnye i soderzhatel’no-tematicheskie aspekty razvitiya f(vmesto vvedeniya). Istoriya otechestvennoj i mirovoj psihologicheskoj mysli: znat’ proshloe, analizirovat’ nastoyashchee, prognozirovat’ budushchee. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, Yu.V. Kovaleva, Yu.N. Olejnik. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2023. P. 11–31. (In Russian)
- Olejnik Yu.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mekhanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznaniya. Chast’ 1. Sostoyanie i trudnosti izucheniya. Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 25. № 3. P. 5–14. (In Russian)
- Olejnik Yu.N., Tihonova E.V. Sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya metodologii otechestvennoj istorii psihologii (po materialam seminara “Arzamasskie chteniya — 5”). Psihologicheskii zhurnal. 2023. V. 44. № 6. P. 5–15. (In Russian)
- Osnovy gosudarstvennoj politiki Rossijskoj Federacii v oblasti istoricheskogo prosveshcheniya. Utverzhdeny Ukazom Prezidenta Rossijskoj Federacii 8 maya 2004 g. № 314. Russian President oficial website. URL: http:// static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/AFZhXphYZLa DAxIkLpI77nzFzg7hKPI2.pdf (date of access: 14.05.2024). (In Russian)
- Ragozin N.P. Tradiciya kak ob”ektivnaya forma social’no-istoricheskoj preemstvennosti. Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo. 2016. № 17 (238). Vyp. 37. P. 48–55. (In Russian)
- Tihonova E.V. Tradicii kantianstva v russkoj filosofskoj i psihologicheskoj mysli vtoroj poloviny XIX — nachala XX v. Istoriya otechestvennoj i mirovoj psihologicheskoj mysli: sud’by uchenyh, dinamika idej, soderzhanie koncepcij. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Kol’cova, Yu.N. Olejnik. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016. P. 358–368. (In Russian)
- Yaroshevskij M.G. Istoriya psihologii. 3-e izd., dorab. Moscow: Mysl’. 1985. 575 p. (In Russian)
- Shackij E. Utopiya i tradiciya: Per. s pol’sk. Ed. V.A. Chalikova. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 454 p. (In Russian)
- Yurevich A.V. Psihologiya i metodologiya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2005. 312 p. (In Russian)
- Nonaka I. and Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Supplementary files
