Development of a questionnaire for assessing the functions informal subgroups perform in relation to the work group

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The paper presents the results of assessing validity and reliability of a questionnaire designed to measure three key functions of informal subgroups in relation to a small work group, namely: (1) implementing group tasks; (2) within group positioning and influence; and (3) organizing group activity. The questionnaire contains three subscales to assess the corresponding functions of informal subgroups. Three experienced psychologists assessed content validity of the questionnaire. In addition, 290 employees from 49 working groups (departments, sectors, production units, etc.) of various organizations took part in the pilot testing and validation study of the developed questionnaire and of the associated tool for identifying informal subgroups — within the software package “Group Profile — Universal. Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) and Cronbach’s alpha α were calculated, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The questionnaire evaluation procedure was carried out separately for the data obtained: (a) among those sample participants who were included in informal subgroups and (b) for the entire sample. The study shows that in both cases the questionnaire has adequate content validity and confirms a three-factor structure of the questionnaire with every subscale being internally consistent. The questionnaire can be used to solve research and applied problem alike. Its application will allow researchers to expand their understanding of the role of informal subgroups in the life and functioning of work groups. Practitioners (psychologists and human resource professionals) will be able to assess the prevalence of the functions of each subgroup or of a set of subgroups and, based on outcomes of such assessment, purposefully build their work with subgroups in order to improve joint activities and increase performance effectiveness of work groups.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. V. Sidorenkov

Southern Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: avsidorenkov@sfedu.ru

ScD (Psychology), Professor, Professor Professor of the Department of Management Psychology and Legal Psychology

Russian Federation, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Sadovaya str., 105/42

D. S. Ignatov

Southern Federal University

Email: dignatov@sfedu.ru

Teaching Support Specialist

Russian Federation, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Sadovaya str., 105/42

Y. V. Obukhova

Southern Federal University

Email: uvobukhova@yandex.ru

PhD (Psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Developmental Psychology

Russian Federation, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Sadovaya str., 105/42

A. A. Eribekyan

Southern Federal University

Email: anbzezyan@sfedu.ru

PhD (Psychology), Assistant Professor of the Department of Social Psychology

Russian Federation, 344006, Rostov-on-Don, Sadovaya str., 105/42

References

  1. Blauberg I.V., Judin B.G. Ponjatie celostnosti i ego rol’ v nauchnom poznanii. Moscow: Nauka, 1972. 50 p.
  2. Bogdanova D.Ja. Social’no-psihologicheskaja harakteristika sportivnogo kollektiva. Leningrad: GIFK, 1977. 43 p.
  3. Gorbatenko A.S., Gorbatenko T.M. Metodika opredelenija struktury maloj gruppy s pomoshh’ju formalizovannogo analiza mezhlichnostnyh vyborov. Voprosy psihologii. 1984. № 4. P. 112–118.
  4. Gorbatenko T.M. Mezhlichnostnye otnoshenija i professional’nye namerenija starsheklassnikov. Voprosy psihologii. 1988. № 2. P. 138–142.
  5. Kapcov A.V., Kolesnikova E.A. Dinamika struktury uchebnoj studencheskoj gruppy v obrazovatel’noj srede vuza. Vestnik Samarskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. Serija “Psihologija”. 2022. № 1 (31). P. 79–46.
  6. Poddubnyj N.V. Jadro sistemy: ontologicheskij status i gnoseologicheskoe znachenie ponjatija. Sistemnyj podhod v sovremennoj nauke. Eds. I.K. Liseev, V.N. Sadovskij. Moscow: Progress-Tradicija, 2004. P. 386–406.
  7. Setrov M.I. Osnovnye principy i aspekty organizacii system. Principy organizacii sistem i ih metodologicheskoe znachenie. Ed. M.I. Setrova. Kiev, Odessa: Vyssha shkola, 1988. P. 6–25.
  8. Setrov M.I. Cel’, funkcija i organizovannost’ biologicheskih i social’no-jekonomicheskih system. Principy organizacii sistem i ih metodologicheskoe znachenie. Ed. M.I. Setrova. Kiev, Odessa: Vyssha shkola, 1988. P. 78–90.
  9. Sidorenkov A.V. Malaja gruppa i neformal’nye podgruppy: mikrogruppovaja teorija: Monografija. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo JuFu, 2010. 272 p.
  10. Sidorenkov A.V. Neformal’nye podgruppy v maloj gruppe: Monografija. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo APSN SKNC, 2003. 436 p.
  11. Sidorenkov A.V., Sidorenkova I.I., Ul’janova N.Ju. Social’no-psihologicheskie harakteristiki i jeffektivnost’ malyh grupp v organizacii: Monografija. Rostov-na-Donu: Mini Tajp, 2014. 248 p.
  12. Sidorenkov A.V., Shipit’ko O.Ju. Vnutrigruppovye protivorechija, konflikty i jeffektivnost’ grupp v organizacii: monografija. Rostov-na-Donu: Mini Tajp, 2017. 216 p.
  13. Smirnov G.A. Osnovy formal’noj teorii celostnosti (chast’ 1). Sistemnye issledovanija. Metodologicheskie problemy. Ezhegodnik 1979. Moscow: Nauka, 1980. P. 91–127.
  14. Umanskij L.I. Metody jeksperimental’nogo issledovanija social’no-psihologicheskih fenomenov. Metodologija i metody social’noj psihologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1977. P. 54–71.
  15. Judin B.G. Sistemnye predstavlenija v funkcional’nom podhode. Sistemnye issledovanija. Metodologicheskie problemy. Ezhegodnik 1973. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. P. 108–126.
  16. Cronin M.A., Bezrukova K., Weingart L.R., Tinsley C.H. Subgroups within a team: The role of cognitive and affective integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2011. V. 32. Р. 831–849.
  17. Grusky O., Bonacich P., Webster C. The coalition structure of the four-person family. Current Research in Social Psychology. 1995. V. 1. № 3. Р. 6–29,
  18. Guimera R., Uzzi B., Spiro J., Amaral L.A.N. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science. 2005. V. 308. Р. 697–702.
  19. Kahn C. Group disjunction. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. 1991. V. 9. № 2. Р. 151–161.
  20. Kozlowski S.W.J., Bell B.S. Team learning, development, and adaptation. Group learning. Eds. V.I. Sessa, M. London. Mahwah, NY: LEA, 2008. Р. 15–44.
  21. Levine J.M., Prislin R. Social influence in groups. Group processes. Ed. J.M. Levine. N.Y.: Psychology Press, 2013. Р. 135–163.
  22. Luan M., Ren H., Hao X. Perceived subgroups, TMS, and team performance: The moderating role of guanxi perception. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019. V. 10. Art. 2655.
  23. Merton R.K. Social theory and social structure. N.Y.: Free Press, 1968.
  24. Moscovici S. Towards a theory of conversion behavior. Advances in experimental social psychology. Ed. L. Berkowitz. N.Y.: Academic Press, 1980. V. 13. Р. 209–239.
  25. Murnighan J.K., Brass D.J. Intraorganizational coalitions. The handbook of negotiation research. Eds. M. Bazerman, R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard. Connecticut: JAI Press, 1991. Р. 283–306.
  26. Nakao K., Kimball R.A. Longitudinal approach to subgroup formation: Re-analysis of Newcomb’s fraternity data. Social Networks. 1993. V. 15. Р. 109–131.
  27. Parsons T., Smelser N. Economy and society. N.Y.: Free Press, 1956.
  28. Paul R., Drake J.R., Liang H. Global virtual team performance: The effect of coordination effectiveness, trust, and team cohesion. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 2016. V. 59. № 3. Р. 186–202.
  29. Pérez J.A., Mugny G. Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: When being an outgroup is an advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1987. V. 17. № 2. Р. 157–169.
  30. Roodt H., Krug H., Otto K. Subgroup formation in diverse virtual teams: The moderating role of identity leadership. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. V. 12. Art. 722650.
  31. Saizew K., Evans M.B., Allan V., Martin L.J. A season-long examination of team structure and its implications for subgroups in individual sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2021. V. 43. № 3. Р. 248–258.
  32. Sidorenkov A.V., Pavlenko R.V. Group profile computer technique: A tool for complex study of small groups. SAGE Open. 2015. V. 5. № 1. Р. 1–13.
  33. Tiede K.E., Schultheis S.K., Meyer B. Subgroup splits in diverse work teams: subgroup perceptions but not demographic faultlines affect team identification and emotional exhaustion. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. V. 12. Art. 595720.
  34. Tohidi H., Namdari A., Keyser T.K., Drzymalski J. Information sharing systems and teamwork between sub-teams: A mathematical modeling perspective. Journal of Industrial Engineering International. 2017. V. 13. № 4. Р. 513–520.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig.1

Download (86KB)
3. Fig.2

Download (134KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Сидоренков А.V., Игнатов Д.S., Обухова Ю.V., Ерибекян А.A.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies