Subject-oriented comparison of different categories of users of the digital environment

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of indicators of subject-oriented comparison of communicants communicating in a digital environment. The propensity for social comparison is considered, on the one hand, as a general characteristic, on the other hand, it is shown that the focus on comparison may be different for those who communicate a lot and a little on social networks. To assess the overall orientation to social comparison, a Russian-language Questionnaire of Orientation to Social Comparison was used, a Scale of Comparison of physical appearance was used to assess orientation to comparison by appearance, an author’s questionnaire was used to differentiate respondents by different categories. The study involved 156 respondents of different ages. The main hypothesis was that there are differences in the severity of the propensity to compare between those who communicate a lot and a little online. It was found that the more time users spend on social networks and the younger they are, the more they have a general focus on inter- and intra-subject types of comparison and comparison of their appearance. It was revealed that the indicators of orientation to compare oneself with familiar people and to compare oneself in the present with oneself as the respondent could have been, but did not, statistically significantly differ in two categories of social network users: non-communicative respondents are more prone to such types of subject-oriented comparison than communicative respondents, and there are no differences between these groups in their orientation to compare themselves with other people in appearance.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

N. G. Artemtseva

Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: artemcevang@ipran.ru

PhD (Psychology), Senior Research Associate, Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology

Russian Federation, 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13

E. S. Samoylenko

Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: elena.samoylenko@ipran.ru

ScD. (Psychology), Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology

Russian Federation, 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13

References

  1. Artemtseva N.G., Samoylenko E.S. The physical appearance comparison scale (PACS-R): approbation on the russian sample. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2023. V. 45. № 4. P. 110–119. (In Russian)
  2. Brushlinskij A.V. Psihologiya sub”ekta. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2003. (In Russian)
  3. Lomov B.F. Sistemnost’ v psihologii. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy. Moskva-Voronezh: MPSI-NPO “MODEK”, 1996. (In Russian)
  4. Samoylenko E.S. K probleme sistematizacii vidov sravneniya v psihologii. Poznanie i perezhivanie. 2023. V. 4. № 2. P. 6–19.(In Russian)
  5. Samoylenko E.S. The process of comparison in systems of cognition, communication and personality: Dis. … Dr. psikhol. sciences. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS, 2012. (In Russian)
  6. Allan S., Gilbert P. A social comparison scale: Psychometric properties and relationship to psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences. 1995. V. 19 (3). P. 293–299. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00086-L
  7. Andreassen C., Billieux J., Griffiths M., Kuss D., Demetrovics Z., Mazzoni E. et al. The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2016. № 30. P. 252–262. doi: 10.1037/adb0000160
  8. Andreassen C.S., Torsheim T., Brunborg G.S., Pallesen S. Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psychological Reports. 2012. V. 110 (2). P. 501–517. doi: 10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517
  9. Burke M., Cheng J., de Gant B. Social Comparison and Facebook: Feedback, Positivity, and Opportunities for Comparison. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020.
  10. Buunk A.P., Gibbons F.X. Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2007. V. 102 (1). P. 3–21.
  11. Chae J. Virtual makeover: Selfie-taking and social media use increase selfie-editing frequency through social comparison. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. V. 66. P. 370–376.
  12. Cheng J., Burke M., de Gant B. Country differences in social comparison on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2021. V. 4. № CSCW3. P. 1–26.
  13. Chua Trudy Hui Hui, Chang Leanne. Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. № 55. P. 190–197.
  14. Crusius J., Corcoran K., Mussweiler Th. Social Comparison: A Review of Theory, Research, and Applications. Theories in Social Psychology. D. Chadee (Ed.). Wiley-Blackwel, 2022. P. 165–187.
  15. Ellison N.B., Steinfield C., Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007. V. 12 (4). P. 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  16. Feinstein B.A. et al. Negative social comparison on Facebook and depressive symptoms: Rumination as a mechanism. Psychology of popular media culture. 2013. V. 2. № 3. P. 161.
  17. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations. 1954. № 7. P. 117–140.
  18. Gibbons F.X., Buunk A.P. Individual differences in social comparison: development and validation of a measure of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999. № 76 (1). P. 129–142.
  19. Gomez M. et al. Do you dare to compare? The key characteristics of social media users who frequently make online upward social comparisons. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2022. V. 38. № 10. P. 938–948.
  20. Griffiths M.D., Kuss D.J., Demetrovics Z. Social networking addiction: An overview of preliminary findings. Behavioral Addictions. 2014. № 1. P. 119–141.
  21. Haferkamp N., Krämer N.C. Social comparison 2.0: Examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2011. V. 14. № 5. P. 309–314.
  22. Kim H., Schlicht R., Schardt M., Florack A. The contributions of social comparison to social network site addiction. PLos One. 2021. V. 16 (10). Art. e0257795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257795
  23. Lee S.Y. How do people compare themselves with others on social network sites? The case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014. № 32. P. 253–260.
  24. Lewin K.M., Ellithorpe M.E., Meshi D. Social comparison and problematic social media use: Relationships between five different social media platforms and three different social comparison constructs. Personality and Individual Differences. 2022. № 199. P. 111865.
  25. Lup K., Trub L., Rosenthal L. Instagram# instasad?: exploring associations among instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2015. V. 18. № 5. P. 247–252.
  26. Ozimek P., Bierhoff H.W. Facebook use depending on age: the influence of social comparisons. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016. № 61. P. 271–279.
  27. Verduyn P., Gugushvili N., Massar K., Täht K., Kross E. Social comparison on social networking sites. Current opinion in psychology. 2020. № 36. P. 32–37.
  28. Vogel E.A., Rose J.P., Roberts L.R. et al. Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 2014. № 3. P. 206–222.
  29. Vogel E.A., Rose J.P., Okdie B.M. et al. Who compares and despairs? The effect of social comparison orientation on social media use and its outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015. № 86. P. 249–256.
  30. Yang C.-C. Interact and browse on social media, but don’t compare: Instagram use, loneliness, and social comparison orientation. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking. 2016. № 19 (12). P. 703–708. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0201
  31. Yang C., Robinson A. Not necessarily detrimental: Two social comparison orientations and their associations with social media use and college social adjustment. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018. № 84. P. 49–57. DOI: 10.1016/j. chb.2018.02.020

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies