Dynamics of Interpersonal Evaluations under Different Involvement in Communicative Situation

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The objective of the research was to test the hypothesis about the relationship between the features of communicative situations and the perception of a stranger. Three types of situations were used, differing in the degree of the observer's involvement in communication: 1. looking at a photo image of the sitter, 2. watching a video with the sitter in communication, 3. communicating with the sitter “face to face”. It has been shown that the dynamics of interpersonal evaluations are multidirectional and depend rather on the diagnostic metrics used. Thus, the values of adequacy of evaluation of individual psychological features of the sitter are higher in the situation of photo perception as compared to the situations of video perception and face-to-face communication, at the same time the values of complexity of interpersonal evaluation (number of choices of neutral evaluation “0”) are lower in the situation of face-to-face communication and the situation of video perception as compared to the situation of photo perception. The study revealed the dynamics of interpersonal evaluations in different communicative situations, i.e. it was shown how situations influence the way the perception of a communication partner is formed.

About the authors

A. A. Demidov

Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis

Russian Federation, Moscow

Kristina Igorevna Ananyeva

Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Барабанщиков В.А., Носуленко В.Н. Системность. Восприятие. Общение. М.: ИП РАН, 2004.
  2. Гибсон Дж. Экологический подход к зрительному восприятию / Пер. с английского А.Д. Логвиненко. М.: Изд. КоЛибри, 1988. 464 с.
  3. Гришина Н.В. Проблема концептуализации контекста в современной психологии // Социальная психология и общество. 2018. Т. 9. № 3. С. 10–20.
  4. Демидов А.А. Экологический подход к изучению межличностного восприятия: методология и результаты исследований // Познание и переживание. 2022. Т. 3. № 1. С. 6 –27.
  5. Жизненное пространство в психологии: Теория и феноменология: сборник статей / под ред. Н.В. Гришиной, С.Н. Костроминой. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб.ун-та, 2020. 532 с.
  6. Левин К. Динамическая психология. Избранные труды. Перевод с нем. и англ. Е. Патяева, Д. Леонтьева. М.: Смысл, 2001. 572 с.
  7. Росс Л., Нисбетт Р. Человек и ситуация. Перспективы социальной психологии / Пер. с англ. В.В. Румынского; под ред. Е.Н. Емельянова, В.С. Магуна. М.: Аспект Пресс, 1999. 429 с.
  8. Cooper W.H., Withey M.J. The strong situation hypothesis // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2009. V. 13. № 1. P. 62–72.
  9. Funder D.C. Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. Academic Press, 1999.
  10. Funder D.C. Taking situations seriously: The situation construal model and the Riverside Situational Q-sort // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2016. V. 25. № 3. P 203–208.
  11. Kenny D.A. PERSON: A General Model of Interpersonal Perception // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2004. V. 8. № 3. P. 265–280.
  12. Magnusson D. Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
  13. McArthur L.Z., Baron R.M. Toward an ecological theory of social perception // Psychological Review. 1983. V. 90. P. 215–238.
  14. Rauthmann J.F., Sherman R.A. Toward a Research Agenda for the Study of Situation Perceptions: A Variance Componential Framework // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2019. V. 23. № 3. P. 238–266.
  15. Rauthmann J.F., Sherman R.A. The Situation of Situation Research: Knowns and Unknowns // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2020. V. 29. № 5. P. 473–480.
  16. Shoda Y., Mischel W. Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality. 2000. V. 14. № 5. P. 407–428.

Copyright (c) 2023 Демидов А.A., Ананьева К.I.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies