Dichotomy and Two-Component Polytomy in Contemporary Sociology

Capa

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Abstract. The article reveals the need to rethink the heuristic potential of dichotomy as a cognition method in the research of contemporary social reality, which characterizes by its structure complication and dynamics acceleration. Based on the analysis of recent works by foreign and Russian authors, it gives the description of the understanding of dichotomy and the dichotomous method in social and humanitarian knowledge, its comparison with other terms used to characterize opposites and their relationship, and the separation of dichotomies into scientific and everyday ones. This paper analyzes the practice of applying the dichotomous method in sociological research in recent years: it identifies the main sociological dichotomies and reveals their movement in contemporary sociological knowledge, which consists of the use of established dichotomies in the research of the balance between extremes, the convergence of opposites, overcoming contradictions and, conversely, their exacerbation, polarization of social relations that are observed in the contemporary world, as well as the formation of new binary pairs following the example of the dichotomy «sustainability – vulnerability». It determines the changes in the practice of dichotomous method using in the field of social and sociological cognition: on the one side, there is a transition from its use as the main research method to use in combination with other methods and methodological techniques, which allows solving a wider range of research tasks, on the other side, along with dichotomies, researchers construct two-term polytomies, which their authors call dichotomies. The author reveals significant heuristic possibilities of the dichotomous method for conceptualization, analysis and explanation of the increasingly complex and dynamic contemporary social reality: this method allows you to identify the differences between the research objects, to carry out their comparative analysis and interpretation, to reveal their dualism and opposite sides, while emphasizing the independence and interconnectedness of these extremes, to order and generalize the data obtained on the basis of this method, to develop alternative models of explanation.

Sobre autores

Yuliya Pasovets

Kursk State University

Kursk, Russia, 305000 Kursk, Radishchev street, 33

Bibliografia

  1. Вяльшина А.А. Изменение приоритетов развития сельских территорий в условиях усиления глобальной нестабильности // Региональные агросистемы: экономика и социология. 2022. № 3. С. 91–99.
  2. Дихотомии в учебниках гуманитарного цикла / В.П. Клочков, И.С. Казаков, И.В. Кротова и др. Курган: Курганский государственный университет, 2021.
  3. Дихотомические классификации в естественнонаучном знании / Т.В. Малькова, А.В. Овсянникова, И.В. Кротова, Н.О. Васильева. Курган: Курганский государственный университет, 2019.
  4. Костяев А.И., Никонова Г.Н. Дихотомия «город-деревня»: от ретроспективы к современности // Никоновские чтения. 2021. № 26. С. 3–9.
  5. Кравченко С.А. Усложняющаяся динамика российской социологии: эффекты «стрелы времени» // Гуманитарий Юга России. 2019. Т. 8. № 1. С. 33–55. doi: 10.23683/2227-8656.2019.1.2.
  6. Мотрошилова Н.В. «Социальная эпистемология»: новые проблемы, дискуссии и дихотомии // Ценности и смыслы. 2011. № 5 (15). С. 5–31.
  7. Парамонова В.А. «Центр – периферия» как символическая дихотомия городского пространства // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 7: Философия. Социология и социальные технологии. 2009. № 1 (9). С. 126–130.
  8. Писарь Н.В. К вопросу об определении понятия «дихотомия» в лингвистике // Вестник Балтийского федерального университета им. И. Канта. Серия: Филология, педагогика, психология. 2016. № 3. С. 12–18.
  9. Разумова Т.О., Алешина А.Б., Серпухова М.А. Баланс семья-работа в условиях изменений качества трудовой жизни // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. 2020. Т. 16. № 3. С. 24–37. doi: 10.19181/lsprr.2020.16.3.2.
  10. Терин Д.Ф. Категория цивилизации и основная дихотомия социальной теории // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2004. № 1 (69). С. 56–63.
  11. Юрченко В.М., Юрченко И.В., Готин М.Б. Дихотомия «конфликт – интеграция» в современном политическом процессе // Вестник Российской нации. 2020. № 1 (71). С. 57–68.
  12. Яницкий О.Н. Возможно ли сегодня социальное прогнозирование динамики мобильного мира? // Вестник Института социологии. 2019. Т. 10. № 1. С. 11–28. doi: 10.19181/vis.2019.28.1.554.
  13. Antunes de Oliveira F. Development for Whom? Beyond the Developed/Underdeveloped Dichotomy // Journal of International Relations and Development. 2020. Vol. 23. Is. 4. P. 924–946. doi: 10.1057/s41268-019-00173-9.
  14. Bowden A. From Discrete Dichotomies to Plural Paradoxes: Re-Viewing Stratigraphical Time, Temporality and Change // KronoScope. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 182–208. doi: 10.1163/15685241-12341383.
  15. Cheng L. To Leave or Not to Leave? «Intention» Is the Question. Investigating Farmers' Decision Behaviours of Participating in Contemporary China's Rural Resettlement Programme // Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2022. Vol. 97. Art. no. 106888. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106888.
  16. Core Sociological Dichotomies / ed. by C. Jenks. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1998. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222041.
  17. Giordano C. What Is a Mediterranean Agro-town? On The Sense and Nonsense of Anthropological Dichotomies // Logos (Lithuania). 2017. Vol. 92. P. 68–83. doi: 10.24101/logos.2017.49.
  18. Guha P., Neti A., Lobo R. Merging the Public and Private Spheres of Women's Work: Narratives from Women Street Food Vendors during COVID-19 Crisis // Gender, Work and Organization. 2022. Vol. 29. No. 6. P. 1935–1951. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12772.
  19. Ikram M., Zhang Q., Sroufe R., Ferasso M. The Social Dimensions of Corporate Sustainability: An Integrative Framework including Covid-19 Insights // Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020. Vol. 12. Is. 20. P. 1–29. Art. no. 8747. doi: 10.3390/su12208747.
  20. Jain M., Korzhenevych A. The Concept of Planetary Urbanization Applied to India's Rural to Urban Transformation // Habitat International. 2022. Vol. 129. Art. no. 102671. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102671.
  21. Kalinowski S., Łuczak A., Koziolek A. The Social Dimension of Security: The Dichotomy of Respondents’ Perceptions during the COVID-19 Pandemic // Sustainability (Switzerland). 2022. Vol. 14. Is. 3. Art. no. 1363. doi: 10.3390/su14031363.
  22. Kopnina H. Nobody Likes Dichotomies (But Sometimes You Need Them) // Anthropological Forum. 2016. Vol. 26. Is. 4. P. 415‒429. doi: 10.1080/00664677.2016.1243515.
  23. Kuhlman C.J., Marathe A., Vullikanti A., Halim N., Mozumder P. Natural Disaster Evacuation Modeling: The Dichotomy of Fear of Crime and Social Influence // Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 1. Art. no. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00839-8.
  24. Rinofner-Kreidl S. Disenchanting the Fact/Value Dichotomy: A Critique of Felix Kaufmann’s Views on Value and Social Reality // Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality. 2016. Vol. 6. P. 317–348. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2_14.
  25. Patel A., Borja-Vega C., Mimmi L.M., Soukup T., Kolomaznik J., Bhan T., Mundt M.D., Lee H. Predicting Housing Deprivation from Space in The Slums of Dhaka // Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 2022. Vol. 49. Is. 8. P. 2112–2128. doi: 10.1177/23998083221123589.
  26. Polleri M. Towards an Anthropology of Misinformation // Anthropology Today. 2022. Vol. 38. No. 5. P. 17–20. doi: 10.1111/1467-8322.12754.
  27. Putnam H. The Collapse of The Fact / Value Dichotomy and Other Essays / Harvard College. 1 paperback ed., 3 print. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.
  28. Turner B.L. Vulnerability and Resilience: Coalescing or Paralleling Approaches for Sustainability Science? // Global Environmental Change. 2010. Vol. 20. Is. 4. P. 570–576. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003.

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2023

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies