Is "Technosocialism" Socialism?

Cover Page

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The main counter-arguments against the "Technosocialism" by B. King and R. Patty can be reduced to three positions. Firstly, the most advanced technologies so far cannot not only provide a high standard of living for entire mankind, but even in the countries of the "golden billion" there will not be enough funds to introduce a basic unconditional income. Second, the potential to ensure prosperity for all will not translate into reality if existing institutions in society block the redistribution of wealth and life opportunities from the elite to the poor. Most importantly, thirdly, ensuring the satisfaction of human needs without participation in joint work is simply dangerous, since it is fraught with degradation of the individual and society. The model of "technosocialism" is therefore not only impossible at the present stage of development, but also dangerous if it were possible. The concept of "technosocialism" turns out to be a combination of a semi-fantastic utopia and dystopia, reflecting the contradictions of the Western technocrats' public consciousness, who are passionate about the introduction of digital technologies into business, but see its ambiguity. This concept with all its shortcomings and advantages fully fits the “bourgeois socialism” described in the “Manifesto” by K. Marx and F. Engels. The most important positive role that Technosocialism can play is the role of a challenge to professional social scientists who are close to the socialist idea.

About the authors

Yuri Valer'evich Latov

Institute of Sociology FCTAS RAS

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Аристотель. Сочинения: В 4 т. Т. 4. М.: Мысль, 1983.
  2. Давыдов Д.А. Техно(крато)социализм: критический взгляд на идеи Б. Кинга и Р. Пэтти // Социологические исследования. 2023б. № 9. С.
  3. Давыдов Д.А. Марксизм в плену у интерсекциональности // Социологические исследования. 2023а. № 2. С. 125–136.
  4. Капелюшников Р.И. Универсальный базовый доход: есть ли у него будущее? // Вопросы экономики. 2020. № 8. С. 95–127.
  5. Ключарев Г.А. Навстречу будущему: размышления о техносоциализме и непрерывном образовании // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 9. С.
  6. Латов Ю.В., Тихонова Н.Е. Новое общество – новый ресурс – новый класс? (к 60-летию теории человеческого капитала) // Terra Economicus. 2021. Т. 19. № 2. С. 6–27.
  7. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Манифест Коммунистической партии // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. 2-е изд. Т. 4. М.: Госполитиздат, 1955. С. 419–459.
  8. Нуреев Р.М. Экономика развития: модели становления рыночной экономики. 2-е изд. М.: Инфра-М, 2022.
  9. Уэбстер Ф. Теории информационного общества. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2004.

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies