Experimental Study of Lexical Choice Situation (on the Material of the Constructions otkryvat’ butylku ‘open a bottle’ and otkuporivat’ butylku ‘uncork a bottle’)

封面

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Lexical competition between lexical units and extralinguistic factors influencing lexical choice have remained one of the fundamental problems within the scope of the onomasiological approach to lexical semantics as of yet. In previous studies of one of the authors, such competition was explored with an example of the constructions otkryvat’ butylku ‘open a bottle’ and otkuporivat’ butylku ‘uncork a bottle’. The experimental study reported in this article provides some evidence in favor of the results obtained in the previous research based on a corpus analysis. In this study, the participants filled the most appropriate, in their opinion, words in the gaps in the sentences taken from the Russian National Corpus, which previously contained the verb otkuporivat’ ‘uncork’. The results of the study confirmed earlier observations that the verb otkuporivat’ correlates with the “literary” context of use and the verb otkryvat’ with the “everyday” context. In addition, the results of the experiments pave the way for the correlation between the construction otkryvat’ butylku and the action of a “fast” cognitive system that activates surface connections between lexical units, and the correlation between the construction otkuporivat’ butylku and the action of a “slow” system that creates a mental representation of the situation designated in the sentence.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Vladimir Glebkin

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; School №1514

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: gleb1514@gmail.com
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow; Moscow

Elizaveta Evchuk

Email: liza.evchuk@gmail.com

an independent researcher

俄罗斯联邦

参考

  1. Глебкин В. В. Открывание бутылок как предмет лингвокультурного анализа // Русский язык в научном освещении. № 1 (41), 2021. С. 64–86. Glebkin V. V. [Opening bottles as a subject of linguistic and sociocultural analysis]. Russkii yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2021, no. 1 (41), pp. 64–86. (In Russ.)
  2. Barsalou L., Santos A., Simmons K., Wilson Ch. Language and simulation in conceptual processing // Symbols and embodiment: debates on meaning and cognition / ed. by M. de Vega, M. Arthur, A. Glenberg and A. Graesser. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 245–283.
  3. Geeraerts D. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. 341 p.
  4. Geeraerts D. Ten lectures on cognitive sociolinguistics. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2018. 330 p.
  5. Geeraerts D., Grondelaers S., Bakema P. The structure of lexical variation: meaning, naming, and context. Berlin; New York: M. de Gruyter, 1994. 221 p.
  6. Glebkin V. An onomasiological competition: a view from sociocultural perspective // Review of cognitive linguistics. 2023. V. 21, Iss. 2, pp. 331–350.
  7. Grzega J. Bezeichnungswandel: Wie, Warum, Wozu? Ein Beitrag zur englischen und allgemeinen Onomasiologie. Heidelberg: Winter, 2004. 337 p.
  8. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013. 499 p.
  9. Sauer H. Moral thinking, fast and slow. New York: Routledge, 2018. 118 p.
  10. Štekauer P. An Onomasiological Theory of Word-Formation in English. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins, 1998. 192 p.

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

##common.cookie##