How is a Generically Personal Statement Born?
- Authors: Nikitina E.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Research Center “Informatics and Management” of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 1 (2024)
- Pages: 33-48
- Section: Issues of Modern Russian Language
- URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/0131-6117/article/view/255737
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0131611724010037
- ID: 255737
Abstract
The paper analyzes generalizing statements written by children (7–11 years old) and explores features that distinguish typifying statements from generically personal ones. The former are characterized by generalization of time and subject of the sentence, the latter are specified not only by time and subject generalization, but also by the inclusive speaker. The paper proves the idea that generically personal statements (e. g. proverbs) acquire an ethical value because the speaker is potentially included in both participants of a personal conflict. Generically personal statements can be formulated not only in relation to a human being per se, but also to a class of living nature. This becomes possible if there is some correlation with human beings (“our smaller brethren”, “living creatures”, etc.). Based on the material of children`s essays, the paper examines deviations in the “process of generalization”, and traces generalization skills development as they are held in age dynamics. The ways of generalization of a living being/person are: unsubstituted nominal positions, generalizing and demonstrative pronouns, full-nominal vocabulary (generic nouns, adjectives used without nouns), relative clauses, idiomatic designations. Generalization vocabulary skills of older children correlate with their mastery of syntactic techniques. The paper also discusses the role of pronouns and adjectives used without a noun, as manifestations of the covert category of person and a category of animacy.
Full Text
About the authors
Elena N. Nikitina
Federal Research Center “Informatics and Management” of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: yelenon@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow
References
- Arutyunova N. D. Tipy yazykovykh znachenii: Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of linguistic meanings: Assessment. Event. Fact]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 341 p.
- Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Yazykovaya kontseptualizatsiya mira (na materiale russkoi grammatiki) [Linguistic conceptualization of the world (based on the material of Russian grammar)]. Moscow, Yazyki Russkoi Kul’tury Publ., 1997. 576 p.
- Vinogradov V. V. Russkii yazyk (Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove) [Russian language (Grammatical teaching of the word)]. Moscow — Leningrad, State Educational and Pedagogical Publishing House of the Ministry of Education of the RSFSR, 1947. 784 p.
- Zeigarnik B. V. Patopsikhologiya [Pathopsychology]. 2nd ed., revis. and expand. Moscow, Moscow Univ. Publ., 1986. 287 p.
- Zolotova G. A., Onipenko N. K., Sidorova M. Yu. Kommunikativnaya grammatika russkogo yazyka [Communicative grammar of the Russian language]. Moscow, 2004. 541 p.
- Il’enko S. G. [Three aspects of compositional and stylistic analysis of a literary text as an integral education]. Khudozhestvennyi tekst: aspekty sverkhfrazovoi organizatsii [Artistic text: aspects of a super-educational organization]. St. Petersburg, Herzen Univ. Publ., 1997, pp. 5–19. (In Russ.)
- Onipenko N. K., Nikitina E. N. [Grammar of catch phrases]. Russkaya slovesnost’, 2006, no. 4, pp. 56–63. (In Russ.)