Imitation as an adaptation tool in pottery making in New Spain

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Ceramics produced in the Viceroyalty of New Spain in the 16th – 18th centuries serve as a valuable source for studying the history of intercultural contacts and colonization of the American continent. This article focuses on tableware ceramics and their significance in the sociocultural adaptation of colonial populations. The production of pottery on the Iberian Peninsula prior to colonization is described, and the function of ceramic vessels during the initial stages of conquest is explored. The article also examines questions of continuity and innovation in pottery production technology, and presents models for the emergence of new ceramic types in New Spain. Additionally, connections are established between the external appearance of tableware and the social identity of its owner. Particular attention is paid to the study of Tonala Polychrome ceramic type, which is an excellent example of local potters adapting to new standards of tableware. The work is based on the study of collections of Tonaltec pottery from the 17th to 18th centuries found in museums across Russia, Spain, and France.

About the authors

Olga V. Kondakova

Peter the Great Museum of anthropology and ethnography (Kunstkamera) Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: sokolovaolga09@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8892-7286
Junior researcher St. Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. Finlay R. The Pilgrim Art: Cultures of Porcelain in world history. Berkeley, University of California Press, 2010, 415 p.
  2. Odell D. Delftware and the Domestication of Chinese Porcelain. EurAsian Matters: China, Europe, and the Transcultural Object, 1600 – 1800. Springer International Publishing AG, 2018, pp. 175-202.
  3. Тесленко И.Б., Майко В.В. Испанская керамика с росписью кобальтом и люстром из раскопок в Судаке. История и археология Крыма, выпуск X, 2019, сс. 279-310. [Teslenko I.B., Majko V.V. Ispanskaja keramika s rospis'ju kobal'tom i ljustrom iz raskopok v Sudake [Spanish ceramics with cobalt painting and chandelier from excavations in Sudak]. Istorija i arheologija Kryma, v. X, 2019, pp. 279-310. (In Russ.).
  4. Pleguezuelo A. Centers of Traditional Spanish Mayólica. Cerámica y Cultura: The Story of Spanish and Mexican Mayólica. Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, 2003, pp. 24-47.
  5. Capelli C., Cabella R. Technological transfer and trade routes of glazed wares in Medieval and post-Medieval times in the western Mediterranean. “Global pottery” from Savona and Albisola. Global pottery 1. Historical Archaeology and Archaeometry for Societies in Contact. Oxford, BAR Publishing, 2015, pp. 27-36.
  6. Stoner W.D., Nichols D.L. Pottery Trade and the Formation of Early and Middle Formative Style Horizons as Seen from Central Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica, 30 (2019), pp. 311-337.
  7. Jadot E., Pereira G., Neff H., Glascock M.D. All that glitters is not Plumbate: Diffusion and Imitation of Plumbate pottery during the Early Postclassic Period (AD 900—1200) at the Malpaís of Zacapu, Michoacán, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity, 30 (2), 2019, pp. 318-332.
  8. Neff H. Pots as Signals: Explaining the Enigma of Long-distance Ceramic Exchange. Craft and Science: International Perspectives on Archaeological Ceramics, vol.1. Doha, Qatar, Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation, 2014, pp. 1-11.
  9. Goméz Serafín S., Fernández Dávila E. Catálogo de los objetos cerámicos de la Orden Dominicana del ex convento de Santo Domingo de Oaxaca. México, D.F., Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, 2007, 228 p.
  10. Fox A.A., Ulrich K.M. A Guide to Ceramics from Spanish Colonial Sites in Texas. San Antonio, CAR-UTSA, 2008, 157 p.
  11. Rodríguez Mariscal N.E. Actuación arqueológica de urgencia: control y seguimiento arqueológico del dragado del Bajo de las Cabezuelas, Bahía de Cádiz-Cádiz. Anuario arqueológico de Andalucía: III actividades de urgencia. Sevilla, Egondi Artes Gráficas, 1995, pp. 32-37.
  12. Somé Muñoz P.; Huarte Cambra R., Tabalez Rodríguez M.A., Pozo Blázquez F., Oliva Alonso D. Secuencia estratigráfica evolutiva del edificio sito en c/Conde de Ibarra №18, Sevilla. Anuario arqueológico de Andalucía: III actividades de urgencia. Sevilla, Egondi Artes Gráficas, 1995, pp. 480-490.
  13. Tabalez Rodríguez M.A., Pozo Blázquez F., Oliva Alonso D. Estudio arqueológico del Palacio de Conde de Ibarra 18. Sevilla, Anuario arqueológico de Andalucía: III actividades de urgencia. Sevilla, Egondi Artes Gráficas, 1995, pp. 491-506.
  14. López Rosendo E. Cerámica indígena mexicana de los primeros contactos coloniales en El Puerto de Santa María (Cádiz, España). Revista de Historia de El Puerto, 2013 (1er semestre), N 50, pp. 35-78.
  15. Deagan K. Artifacts of the Spanish Colonies of Florida and the Caribbean, 1500—1800. Vol. 1: Ceramics, Glassware, and Beads. Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press, 1987, 222 p.
  16. Кондакова О.В. О чувственном восприятии керамики букаро в контексте истории европейского коллекционирования. Кунсткамера, 2023, 2 (20), сс. 26-42. [Kondakova O.V. O chuvstvennom vospriyatii keramiki bukaro v kontekste istorii evropejskogo kollekcionirovaniya [On the sensory perception of Bucaro ceramics in the context of the history of European collecting]. Kunstkamera, 2023, 2 (20), pp. 26-42. (In Russ.).
  17. Garcia Saiz M.C., Barrio Moya J.L. Presencia de cerámica colonial mexicana en España. Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, 1987, N 58, pp. 103-110.
  18. Garcia Saiz M.C. Mexican Ceramics in Spain. Cerámica y Cultura: The Story of Spanish and Mexican Mayólica. Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, 2003, pp. 186-203.
  19. Tous M., Fauria C. La cerámica de Tonalá en el Museu Etnològic de Barcelona: una aproximación multidisciplinar. Patrimonio cultural e identidad. Barcelona, Ministerio de Cultura, 2007, pp. 217-223.
  20. Tricornot M. Céramiques des Amériques à Sèvres: les collecteurs et leurs intermédiaires. Sèvres: Revue de la société des amis du Musée National de Céramique. Paris, 2013, N 22, pp. 26-67.
  21. Kondakova O.V. Búcaros de Guadalajara en San Petersburgo. Tornaviaje: Tránsito artístico entre los virreinatos americanos y la metropolis. Santiago de Compostela y Sevilla, Enredars, Andavira, 2020, pp. 175-185.
  22. Estrada I.H., La tradición alfarera de Tonalá, Jalisco. Tesis para optar por el grado de maestro en arqueología. México, D.F., 2009, 316 p.
  23. Iñañez J.G., Speakman R.J., Buxeda y Garrigós J., Glascock M.D. Chemical characterization of majolica from 14th – 18th century production centers on the Iberian Peninsula: a preliminary neutron activation study. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2008, N 35, pp. 425-440.
  24. Reina M.V., Torres P.L. La cerámica medieval sevillana (siglos XII al XIV). La producción trianera. Oxford, BAR International Series 1403, 2005, 331 p.
  25. Sánchez J.M. La cerámica exportada a América en el Siglo XVI a través de la documentación del Archivo General de Indias. Laboratorio de Arte, 1996, N 9, pp. 125-142.
  26. Sánchez J.M. La cerámica exportada a América en el Siglo XVI a través de la documentación del Archivo General de Indias (II). Laboratorio de Arte, 1998, N 11, pp. 121-133.
  27. Lister F.C., Lister R.H. Sixteenth century maiolica pottery in the Valley of Mexico. Tucson, The University of Arizona Press, 1982, 110 p.
  28. Lister F.C., Lister R.H. Andalusian Ceramics in Spain and New Spain. A Cultural Register from the Third Century B.C. to 1700. Tucson, The University of Arizona Press, 1987, 362 p.
  29. Gavin R.F., Introduction. Cerámica y Cultura: The Story of Spanish and Mexican Mayólica. Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press, 2003, pp. 1-23.
  30. Calle B.S. Vientos de Acapulco: Relaciones entre América y Oriente. Valladolid, Sever-Cuesta, 1991, 144 p.
  31. Ruiz O.S.I. De Asia a la Nueva España vía Europa: lacas asiáticas y achinadas en el Siglo XVIII. Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, 2017, vol. XXXIX, N 111, pp. 131-188.
  32. Slack E.R. Orientalizing New Spain: Perspectives on Asian Influence in Colonial Mexico. México y la Cuenca del Pacífico, 2012, N 43, pp. 97-127.
  33. Fournier P., Bishop R.L. Colonial pottery in Mexico. Global pottery 1. Historical Archaeology and Archaeometry for Societies in Contact. Oxford, BAR Publishing, 2015, pp. 223-239.
  34. Rice P.M. Political-Ecology Perspectives on New World Loza (Majolica). International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 2013, vol. 17, N 4, pp. 651-83.
  35. Charlton T.H., Fournier P., Charlton C.L. La cerámica del periodo colonial temprano en la Cuenca de México. Permanencia y cambio en la cultura material. La producción alfarera en el México Antiguo, México, INAH, 2007, Vol. V, pp. 429-496.
  36. Fournier P., Castillo K., Bishop R.L., Blackman J.M. La loza blanca novohispana: Tecnohistoria de la mayólica en México. Arqueología colonial latinoamericana: modelos de estudio. Oxford, BAR Internacional series, 2009, pp. 99-114.
  37. McQuade M.C. Talavera Poblana: Four Centuries of a Mexican Ceramic Tradition. New-York, Americas Society, 1999, 112 p.
  38. Priyadarshini M. Chinese Porcelain in Colonial Mexico. The Material Worlds of an Early Modern Trade. Le Havre, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018, 198 p.
  39. Rodríguez-Alegría E., Neff H., Glascock, M.D. Indigenous ware or Spanish import? The case of Indígena ware and approaches to power in colonial Mexico. Latin American Antiquity, 2003,14 (1), pp. 67-81.
  40. Iñañez J.G., Bellucci J.J., Rodríguez-Alegría E., Ash R., McDonough W., Speakman R.J. Romita pottery revisited: a reassessment of the provenance of ceramics from colonial Mexico by LA-MC-ICP-MS. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37 (2010), pp. 2698-2704.
  41. Fournier P., Blackman M.J., Bishop R.L. Los alfareros purépecha de la Cuenca de Pátzcuaro: producción, intercambio y consumo de cerámica vidriada durante la época virreinal. Arqueología y complejidad social. México, 2007, pp. 195-219.
  42. Liebmann M.J. Parsing Hybridity: Archaeologies of Amalgamation in Seventeenth-Century New Mexico. The Archaeology of Hybrid Material Culture, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 39. Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 2013, pp. 25-49.
  43. Trigg H.B. Spanish-Pueblo interactions in New-Mexico’s Seventeenth-Century Spanish households: negotiations of knowledge and power in practice. International journal of historical archaeology, 2020, pp. 618-641.
  44. Sánchez G.H. Indigenous pottery technology of Central Mexico during early colonial times. Material encounters and indigenous transformations in the early colonial Americas, Leiden, Boston, Brill, 2019, vol. 9, pp. 284-307.
  45. Цетлин Ю.Б. Древняя керамика. Теория и методы историко-культурного подхода. М., ИА РАН, 2012, 430 с. [Cetlin Ju.B. Drevnjaja keramika. Teorija i metody istoriko-kul'turnogo podhoda [Ancient ceramics. Theory and methods of the historical-cultural approach]. Moscow, IA RAN, 2012, 430 p. (In Russ.).
  46. Keelin E.M. Cultural Refraction through Transpacific Material Exchange: Chinese Porcelain and Early Colonial Spanish America. Thesis, Master of Arts. Austin, The University of Texas, 2017, 81 p.
  47. Schöndube O.D. Alfarería prehispánica. Artes de México, Nueva época, Cerámica de Tonalá, invierno 1991, N 14, pp. 27-33.
  48. Martín C.E. Sobre bernegales mexicanos del siglo XVII. Estudios de Platería. San Eloy 2004. Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2004, pp. 147-164.
  49. Phipps E., Hecht J., Martín C.E. The Colonial Andes: Tapestries and Silverwork, 1530-1830. New York, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2004, 396 p.
  50. Hess C. Italian Maiolica: catalogue of the collections. Malibu, Wilsted & Taylor, 1988, 127 p.
  51. Бобринский А.А. Формы-подражания черняховских гончаров стеклянным и металлическим прототипам: проблемы методики изучения и хронологии сосудов. Формы глиняных сосудов как объект изучения. Историко-культурный подход. М., ИА РАН, 2018, сс. 63-123 [Bobrinskij A.A. Formy-podrazhanija chernjahovskih goncharov stekljannym i metallicheskim prototipam: problemy metodiki izuchenija i hronologii sosudov [Forms-imitation of Chernyakhov potters' glass and metal prototypes: problems of methods of studying and chronology of vessels.]. Formy glinjanyh sosudov kak ob#ekt izuchenija. Istoriko-kul'turnyj podhod. Moscow, IA RAN, 2018, pp. 63-123 (In Russ.).
  52. Маршак Б.И. Влияние торевтики на согдийскую керамику VII – VIII вв. Труды Государственного Эрмитажа, Т. V. Л., 1961, сс. 177-201. [Marshak B.I. Vlijanie torevtiki na sogdijskuju keramiku VII – VIII vv. [The influence of toreutics on Sogdian ceramics of the 7th – 8th centuries.]. Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Jermitazha, T. V. Leningrad, 1961, pp. 177-201. (In Russ.).
  53. Neva R.G. Platería y plateros en Sanlúcar de Barrameda de los s. XVI-XIX. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Sevilla. Departamento de historia del arte, 2016, 672 p.
  54. Gutiérrez Alonso L.C. Precisiones a la cerámica de los bodegones de Luis Egidio Meléndez. Boletín del Museo del Prado, 1983, Issue 4, pp. 162-166.
  55. Wilson T. Spanish pottery in the British Museum. Spanish Medieval Ceramics in Spain and the British Isles. Oxford, BAR International Series 610, 1995, pp. 339-351.
  56. Lustreware from Spain: A Collection of Hispano-Moresque Ceramics. London, SAM FOGG, 2021, 62 p.
  57. Caiger-Smith A. Lustre Pottery. Technique, tradition and innovation in Islam and the Western World. London-Boston, Faber and Faber, 1985, 246 p.
  58. Blackman M.J., Fournier P., Bishop R.L. Complejidad e interaccion social en el Mexico colonial: identidad, produccion, intercambio y consumo de lozas de tradicion iberica, con base en analisis de activacion neutronica. Cuicuilco, enero-abril, 2006, vol. 13, N 36, pp. 203-222.
  59. Castillo K., Fournier P. A Study of the Chinese Influence on Mexican Ceramics. Archaeology of Manila Galleon Seaports and Early Maritime Globalization. Singapore, Springer, 2019, pp. 253-268.
  60. Charlton T.H., Fournier P. Pots and Plots: The Multiple Roles of Early Colonial Red Wares in the Basin of Mexico (Identity, Resistance, Negotiation, Accommodation, Aesthetic Creativity, or Just Plain Economics?). Rethinking the Archaeology of Spanish Colonialism in the Americas. Santa Fe, SAR Press, 2011, pp. 127-148.
  61. Кубе А.Н. Испано-мавританская керамика. Каталоги собраний Эрмитажа, II. Москва, Ленинград, Издательство Академии наук СССР, 1940, 72 с. [Kube, A.N. Ispano-mavritanskaja keramika. Katalogi sobranij Jermitazha, II [Hispano-Moorish ceramics. Catalogs of Hermitage collections, II]. Moscow, Leningrad, Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1940, 72 p. (In Russ.).
  62. Amigues F. La cerámica gótico-mudéjar valenciana y las fuentes de inspiración de sus temas decorativos. Spanish Medieval Ceramics in Spain and the British Isles. Oxford, BAR International Series 610, 1995, pp. 141-158.
  63. Vives N.S. La cerámica en verde y negro: Los orígenes de una tradición historiográfica. Índice histórico español, 2021, pp. 211-235.
  64. Kingsley S.A. The Deep-Sea Tortugas Shipwreck, Florida (1622): the Ceramic Tablewares. Odyssey Marine Exploration Papers, 2014, 36, pp. 1-97.
  65. Lavado Paradinas P.J. Peces y aves: dos temas iconográficos de procedencia musulmana en la cerámica medieval española. Al-Andalus Magreb, 1996, 4, pp. 299-323.
  66. Martín M.C.R. Cerámica verde-manganeso localizada en Cataluña (Siglos XIV-XV): Elementos decorativos. VIIe Congrés International sur la Céramique Médiévale en Méditerranées. Athénes, 2003, pp. 739-750.
  67. Magali M.C. Imagining Identity in New Spain: race, lineage, and the colonial body in portraiture and casta paintings. Austin, University of Texas Press, 2003, 188 p.
  68. Earle R. The body of the conquistador: food, race and the colonial experience in Spanish America. New-York, Cambridge University Press, 2012, 265 p.

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies