Investigation of the effect of scandium concentration in the oxide composition Y2O3–Sc2O3–Al2O3–Er2O3 on the thermophysical properties of optical ceramics

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The influence of the concentration and position of scandium cations on the thermophysical characteristics of optical ceramics based on a solid solution of Y2O3–Er2O3–Sc2O3–Al2O3 oxides with a garnet structure has been studied. It is established that an increase in the total concentration of scandium leads to a decrease in the thermal conductivity coefficient in ceramics. The dependences of the thermal conductivity coefficient on the concentration and position of scandium cations in the garnet lattice are obtained. As a result the decrease in thermal conductivity of ceramics based on yttrium-erbium-scandium-aluminum garnet is due to structural disordering associated with partial substitution of cations in six- and eight-coordinate positions in the garnet lattice.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. S. Chikulina

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
Russian Federation, Stavropol, 355009

D. S. Vakalov

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
Russian Federation, Stavropol, 355009

S. N. Kichuk

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
Russian Federation, Stavropol, 355009

V. A. Tarala

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
Russian Federation, Stavropol, 355009

F. F. Malyavin

International Research Technological University “MISIS”

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

L. V. Kozhitov

International Research Technological University “MISIS”

Author for correspondence.
Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991

References

  1. Ikesue A., Aung Y.L. // Nat. Photonics. 2008. V. 2. № 12. P. 721. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2008.243
  2. Bisson J.-F., Feng Y., Shirakawa A. et al. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2003. V. 42. P. L1025. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.42.L1025
  3. Sanghera J., Bayya S., Villalobos G. et al. // Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2011. V. 33. № 3. P. 511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2010.10.038
  4. Lukyashin K.E., Ishchenko A.V. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 8. P. 1203. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621080131
  5. Ivanov M.G., Kopylov Y.L., Kravchenko V.B. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2014. V. 50. № 9. P. 951. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168514090040
  6. Golovkina L.S., Nokhrin A.V., Boldin M.S. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2018. V. 54. № 12. P. 1291. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002016851812004X
  7. Sanghera J., Kim W., Villalobos G. et al. // Materials (Basel). 2012. V. 5. № 12. P. 258. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ma5020258
  8. Nakamura S. High-Power and High Efficiency Yb:YAG Ceramic Laser at Room Temperature // Front. Guid. Wave Opt. Optoelectron. InTech, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5772/39540
  9. Alekseeva L.S., Nokhrin A.V., Karazanov K.O. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2022. V. 58. № 2. P. 199. https://doi.org/ 10.1134/S0020168522020017
  10. Brauch U., Röcker C., Graf T. et al. // Appl. Phys. B. 2022. V. 128. № 3. P. 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-021-07736-0
  11. Carreaud J., Boulesteix R., Maître A. et al. // Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2013. V. 35. № 4. P. 704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2012.07.021
  12. Ferrier A., Ilas S., Goldner P. et al. // J. Lumin. 2018. V. 194. № February. P. 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2017.09.056
  13. Tarala V.A., Shama M.S., Chikulina I.S. et al. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019. V. 102. P. 4862. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.16294
  14. Revenko D.M., Chapura O.M., Bondarenko E.A. et al. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021. V. 1989. № 1. P. 12017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1989/1/012017
  15. Zhmykhov V.Y., Dobretsova E.A., Pyrkov Y.N. et al. The influence of Sc 3+ ions on fluorescence lifetime of Yb 3+ in Yb- doped yttrium scandium aluminum garnet (Yb:YSAG) ceramics // Int. Conf. Laser Opt. IEEE, 2022. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLO54117.2022. 9839777
  16. Okada H., Tanaka M., Kiriyama H. et al. // Opt. Lett. 2010. V. 35. № 18. P. 3048. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.003048
  17. Saikawa J., Sato Y., Taira T. et al. // Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2007. V. 29. № 10. P. 1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2006.01.031
  18. Nikova M.S., Tarala V.A., Malyavin F.F. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2021. V. 47. № 2. P. 1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.003
  19. Nikova M.S., Tarala V.A., Malyavin F.F. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022. V. 42. Is. 5. P. 1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.01.008
  20. Nikova M.S., Tarala V.A., Vakalov D.S. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019. V. 39. № 15. P. 4946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.07.041
  21. Suárez M., Fernández A., Menéndez J.L. et al. // J. Nanomater. 2009. V. 2009. P. 1. https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2009/138490
  22. Gandhi A.S., Levi C.G. // J. Mater. Res. 2005. V. 20. № 4. P. 1017. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2005.0133
  23. Baumer V.N., Vovk E.A., Vovk O.M. et al. // Funct. Mater. 2008. V. 15. № 5. P. 540.
  24. Wang L., Kou H., Zeng Y. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2012. V. 38. № 5. P. 4401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.055
  25. Tel’nova G.B., Kolomiets T.Y., Konovalov A.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015. V. 60. № 2. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023615020187
  26. Palmero P., Stella C., Simone A. et al. // Glass. Phys. Chem. 2005. V. 31. № 4. P. 530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10720-005-0094-9
  27. Bulyga D.V., Sadovnichy R.V., Dukelsky K.V. et al. // Glass. Phys. Chem. 2022. V. 48. № 2. P. 151. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659622020031
  28. Лукин Е.С., Андрианов Н.Т., Мамаева Н.Б. и др. // Огнеупоры и техническая керамика. 1993. № 5. С. 11.
  29. Beil K., Fredrich-Thornton S.T., Tellkamp F. et al. // Opt. Express. 2010. V. 18. № 20. P. 20712. https://doi.org/ 10.1364/OE.18.020712
  30. Akl A.A., Mahmoud S.A., AL-Shomar S.M. et al. // Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018. V. 74. P. 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.10.007
  31. Nikova M.S., Tarala V.A., Kravtsov A.A. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint. 2022.08.235
  32. Zhou Y., Gan G., Ge Z. et al. // J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2021. V. 9. № 2. P. 629. https://doi.org/10.1080/21870764.2021.1907025
  33. Ping X., Meng B., Li C. et al. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.18457
  34. Wright A.J., Wang Q., Ko S.-T. et al. // Scripta Mater. 2020. V. 181. P. 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.02.011
  35. Fan T.Y., Ripin D.J., Aggarwal R.L. et al. // IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2007. V. 13. № 3. P. 448. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2007.896602
  36. Pujol M.C., Maitre A., Carreaud J. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014. V. 118. № 25. P. 13781. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5027493
  37. Maksimov R., Shitov V., Osipov V. et al. // Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2023. V. 137. № October 2022. P. 113542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.113542
  38. Hostaša J., Nečina V., Uhlí řová T. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019. V. 39. № 1. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.04.018

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Diffraction patterns of ceramic powders of samples ES1–ES6, calcined at a temperature of 1100C.

Download (491KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. SEM image of sample ES6 calcined at 1100°C.

Download (551KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Microphotographs of the surface of YErSAG optical ceramics.

Download (1MB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. Optical transmission spectra of YErSAG ceramics and the appearance of the resulting samples (in the insets).

Download (1MB)
Indexing metadata
6. Fig. 5. Temperature dependences of the thermophysical characteristics of YErSAG optical ceramics: specific heat (a), thermal diffusivity (b) and thermal conductivity (c).

Download (925KB)
Indexing metadata
7. Fig. 6. Dependence of the thermal conductivity of YErSAG optical ceramics on the Sc3+ concentration: in the dodecahedral position (a), in the octahedral position (b) and total (c).

Download (654KB)
Indexing metadata
8. Fig. 7. Dependence of the thermal conductivity of YErSAG optical ceramics on the value of the dimensional disorder coefficient.

Download (497KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies