Investigation of the effect of scandium concentration in the oxide composition Y2O3–Sc2O3–Al2O3–Er2O3 on the thermophysical properties of optical ceramics

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The influence of the concentration and position of scandium cations on the thermophysical characteristics of optical ceramics based on a solid solution of Y2O3–Er2O3–Sc2O3–Al2O3 oxides with a garnet structure has been studied. It is established that an increase in the total concentration of scandium leads to a decrease in the thermal conductivity coefficient in ceramics. The dependences of the thermal conductivity coefficient on the concentration and position of scandium cations in the garnet lattice are obtained. As a result the decrease in thermal conductivity of ceramics based on yttrium-erbium-scandium-aluminum garnet is due to structural disordering associated with partial substitution of cations in six- and eight-coordinate positions in the garnet lattice.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

I. Chikulina

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Stavropol, 355009

D. Vakalov

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Stavropol, 355009

S. Kichuk

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Stavropol, 355009

V. Tarala

North-Caucasus Federal University

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Stavropol, 355009

F. Malyavin

International Research Technological University “MISIS”

Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119991

L. Kozhitov

International Research Technological University “MISIS”

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ichikulina@ncfu.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119991

参考

  1. Ikesue A., Aung Y.L. // Nat. Photonics. 2008. V. 2. № 12. P. 721. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2008.243
  2. Bisson J.-F., Feng Y., Shirakawa A. et al. // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2003. V. 42. P. L1025. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.42.L1025
  3. Sanghera J., Bayya S., Villalobos G. et al. // Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2011. V. 33. № 3. P. 511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2010.10.038
  4. Lukyashin K.E., Ishchenko A.V. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 8. P. 1203. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621080131
  5. Ivanov M.G., Kopylov Y.L., Kravchenko V.B. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2014. V. 50. № 9. P. 951. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168514090040
  6. Golovkina L.S., Nokhrin A.V., Boldin M.S. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2018. V. 54. № 12. P. 1291. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002016851812004X
  7. Sanghera J., Kim W., Villalobos G. et al. // Materials (Basel). 2012. V. 5. № 12. P. 258. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ma5020258
  8. Nakamura S. High-Power and High Efficiency Yb:YAG Ceramic Laser at Room Temperature // Front. Guid. Wave Opt. Optoelectron. InTech, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5772/39540
  9. Alekseeva L.S., Nokhrin A.V., Karazanov K.O. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2022. V. 58. № 2. P. 199. https://doi.org/ 10.1134/S0020168522020017
  10. Brauch U., Röcker C., Graf T. et al. // Appl. Phys. B. 2022. V. 128. № 3. P. 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-021-07736-0
  11. Carreaud J., Boulesteix R., Maître A. et al. // Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2013. V. 35. № 4. P. 704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2012.07.021
  12. Ferrier A., Ilas S., Goldner P. et al. // J. Lumin. 2018. V. 194. № February. P. 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2017.09.056
  13. Tarala V.A., Shama M.S., Chikulina I.S. et al. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019. V. 102. P. 4862. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.16294
  14. Revenko D.M., Chapura O.M., Bondarenko E.A. et al. // J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021. V. 1989. № 1. P. 12017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1989/1/012017
  15. Zhmykhov V.Y., Dobretsova E.A., Pyrkov Y.N. et al. The influence of Sc 3+ ions on fluorescence lifetime of Yb 3+ in Yb- doped yttrium scandium aluminum garnet (Yb:YSAG) ceramics // Int. Conf. Laser Opt. IEEE, 2022. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLO54117.2022. 9839777
  16. Okada H., Tanaka M., Kiriyama H. et al. // Opt. Lett. 2010. V. 35. № 18. P. 3048. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.003048
  17. Saikawa J., Sato Y., Taira T. et al. // Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2007. V. 29. № 10. P. 1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2006.01.031
  18. Nikova M.S., Tarala V.A., Malyavin F.F. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2021. V. 47. № 2. P. 1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.003
  19. Nikova M.S., Tarala V.A., Malyavin F.F. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022. V. 42. Is. 5. P. 1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.01.008
  20. Nikova M.S., Tarala V.A., Vakalov D.S. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019. V. 39. № 15. P. 4946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.07.041
  21. Suárez M., Fernández A., Menéndez J.L. et al. // J. Nanomater. 2009. V. 2009. P. 1. https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2009/138490
  22. Gandhi A.S., Levi C.G. // J. Mater. Res. 2005. V. 20. № 4. P. 1017. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2005.0133
  23. Baumer V.N., Vovk E.A., Vovk O.M. et al. // Funct. Mater. 2008. V. 15. № 5. P. 540.
  24. Wang L., Kou H., Zeng Y. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2012. V. 38. № 5. P. 4401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.055
  25. Tel’nova G.B., Kolomiets T.Y., Konovalov A.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015. V. 60. № 2. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023615020187
  26. Palmero P., Stella C., Simone A. et al. // Glass. Phys. Chem. 2005. V. 31. № 4. P. 530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10720-005-0094-9
  27. Bulyga D.V., Sadovnichy R.V., Dukelsky K.V. et al. // Glass. Phys. Chem. 2022. V. 48. № 2. P. 151. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1087659622020031
  28. Лукин Е.С., Андрианов Н.Т., Мамаева Н.Б. и др. // Огнеупоры и техническая керамика. 1993. № 5. С. 11.
  29. Beil K., Fredrich-Thornton S.T., Tellkamp F. et al. // Opt. Express. 2010. V. 18. № 20. P. 20712. https://doi.org/ 10.1364/OE.18.020712
  30. Akl A.A., Mahmoud S.A., AL-Shomar S.M. et al. // Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018. V. 74. P. 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.10.007
  31. Nikova M.S., Tarala V.A., Kravtsov A.A. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint. 2022.08.235
  32. Zhou Y., Gan G., Ge Z. et al. // J. Asian Ceram. Soc. 2021. V. 9. № 2. P. 629. https://doi.org/10.1080/21870764.2021.1907025
  33. Ping X., Meng B., Li C. et al. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.18457
  34. Wright A.J., Wang Q., Ko S.-T. et al. // Scripta Mater. 2020. V. 181. P. 76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.02.011
  35. Fan T.Y., Ripin D.J., Aggarwal R.L. et al. // IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2007. V. 13. № 3. P. 448. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2007.896602
  36. Pujol M.C., Maitre A., Carreaud J. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014. V. 118. № 25. P. 13781. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5027493
  37. Maksimov R., Shitov V., Osipov V. et al. // Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2023. V. 137. № October 2022. P. 113542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.113542
  38. Hostaša J., Nečina V., Uhlí řová T. et al. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019. V. 39. № 1. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.04.018

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. Diffraction patterns of ceramic powders of samples ES1–ES6, calcined at a temperature of 1100C.

下载 (491KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. SEM image of sample ES6 calcined at 1100°C.

下载 (551KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Microphotographs of the surface of YErSAG optical ceramics.

下载 (1MB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. Optical transmission spectra of YErSAG ceramics and the appearance of the resulting samples (in the insets).

下载 (1MB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 5. Temperature dependences of the thermophysical characteristics of YErSAG optical ceramics: specific heat (a), thermal diffusivity (b) and thermal conductivity (c).

下载 (925KB)
索引源数据
7. Fig. 6. Dependence of the thermal conductivity of YErSAG optical ceramics on the Sc3+ concentration: in the dodecahedral position (a), in the octahedral position (b) and total (c).

下载 (654KB)
索引源数据
8. Fig. 7. Dependence of the thermal conductivity of YErSAG optical ceramics on the value of the dimensional disorder coefficient.

下载 (497KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

##common.cookie##